Fundamentally wrong

Page

Next Last

leavesandwaves

@leavesandwaves

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

The exchange program is fundamentally wrong. To save one person why to sacrifice three? That too a small girl. I dont mind Anandi and Mangala being sacrificed.. And a minor cannot decide things.

Quote

Frequent Posters

leavesandwaves

@leavesandwaves

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

And the funny thing is they did not take Mangala's consent. They simply took her for granted as if she is a slave.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

Mangala didn't want to go but nobody asked her to come with them too.

Anandi from beginning she was willing to do what ever it takes to secure Ganga's re;ease from captivity.

Nimboli is being blamed for the kidnap and all the problems by the kids so that influenced her decision.

------------------------

Mangala never volunteered. But what stopped her from saying no?

Didn't she go to Jagya fo help when she needed? Didn't they all go out of their way to ensure that Akheraj got a life term in prison?

Wasn't she taking their protection and living with them?

If it had not been for Anandi and Jagya's protection Akheraj would have captured her and the girl long time back.

Inspite of all this she can only think of herself.

Edited by aparnauma - 9 years ago

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
The exchange program is fundamentally wrong. To save one person why to sacrifice three? That too a small girl. I dont mind Anandi and Mangala being sacrificed.. And a minor cannot decide things.

Exchange programme is fundamentally wrong.But I guess this is the only option left to lure Akheraj out of his hole.

They tried exerting pressure on Akheraj through Kundan and that failed.

If he had only gone with Anandi Akheraj wouldn't believe them so he may try to harm Ganga even more because he suspects foul play.

Mangala anyways never wanted to go but she could have put her foot down and said no when it came to the kid.

Why did she not say no?

Quote

Missesha

@Missesha

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

I do not get this logic that Mangala didn't want to go and she had the option to put her foot down for herself and Nimboli?

How.? On what basis?

Wasn't Akhiraj clear that he wants all three against one? In such a circumstance they had two options. Either trick Akhiraj and get him caught or surrender to his demands. They tried the first option using Kundan, which backfired and so they are trying the second option with a hope that they will all come out of it alive.

In the whole process, how is anyone wrong? Neither Mangala's suggestion is wrong nor J blurting out and nor Anandi's desire to do something for Ganga. Infact they are all working as a team and figuring out. They don't have sure shot options of dealing with Akhiraj or keeping Ganga safe. So they are taking it one at a time.

Their approach looks fairly realistic to me. The plot is developed well and the pace and intensity are gripping so far.

They couldn't have left Mangala or Nimboli behind. That wouldn't solve any purpose. It was either, forget Ganga or let's fight as a team approach. They have taken the second one.

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

Putting one life at risk to save another one is never right but it happens all the time not just in reel world but real world too,

Mangala as per her thoughts she didn't want to go but going only because Nimboli insisted on going.

Anandi holds herself and her daughter responsible for it so she is going and not just because she blames herself but she is the type who would go all out to save someone she cares for.

Nandini is going out of her own sense of what is right and what is wrong and apparently Anandi is in agreement with the girl's thoughts.

Last time round she didn't know that she will lose her daughter when she was trying to save an innocent girl this time she knows what she is getting into and she is trusting Jagya to do everything he can to bring them all safe and going.

Mangala did not put her foot down for her own reasons.

So no one has taken anyone for granted.

Like I have said before if he had gone with Anandi alone Akheraj would have suspected foul play and there wll be a risk of things backfiring.

So they are taking calculated risk.They are hoping to save themselves as well as Ganga.

Quote

leavesandwaves

@leavesandwaves

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

This is a very high risk. Anandi is criticised till now for taking Nandini to the marriage venue. And this is 100 times more dangerous as a desperate man is waiting with a gun and his real target is Nimboli.

And one cant legally take a minor for this purpose of exchange even if the intention is only to lure.

It is like tying a lamb to a tree to lure a tiger.

Edited by leavesandwaves - 9 years ago

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Missesha
I do not get this logic that Mangala didn't want to go and she had the option to put her foot down for herself and Nimboli?
How.? On what basis?

Wasn't Akhiraj clear that he wants all three against one? In such a circumstance they had two options. Either trick Akhiraj and get him caught or surrender to his demands. They tried the first option using Kundan, which backfired and so they are trying the second option with a hope that they will all come out of it alive.

In the whole process, how is anyone wrong? Neither Mangala's suggestion is wrong nor J blurting out and nor Anandi's desire to do something for Ganga. Infact they are all working as a team and figuring out. They don't have sure shot options of dealing with Akhiraj or keeping Ganga safe. So they are taking it one at a time.

Their approach looks fairly realistic to me. The plot is developed well and the pace and intensity are gripping so far.

They couldn't have left Mangala or Nimboli behind. That wouldn't solve any purpose. It was either, forget Ganga or let's fight as a team approach. They have taken the second one.

perfectly said & completely agree wid u.

Mn's idea was not foolish one nor J's blurting out it 2 Ak bcoz none knew that Bd will stop Ak from doing it & he knew all abt cops & their way & J & oders don't know if Bd knew all abt cops.

tho A's desire was not worng but her thinking that Ak only wants her & will release ganga in exchange of her was foolish wen Ak himself said he wanted all 4.A's desire 2 go in exchange of ganga is shown 2 show A as sacrificing queen.

and Mn's expressions were clear that she din't've any prob in going & her thinking in the car abt her blurting out 2 N was also clear abt it. she has only this grudge that they shudn't'd brought N wid them putting her in danger.

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
This is a very high risk. Anandi is criticised till now for taking Nandini to the marriage venue. And this is 100 times more dangerous as a desperate man is waiting with a gun and his real target is Nimboli.

And one cant legally take a minor for this purpose of exchange even if the intention is only to lure.

It is like tying a lamb to a tree to lure a tiger.

Yes Anandi is criticised or will be criticised for this till the show gets over or rather till this BV forum exists😛

That time she did not put her daughter at risk intentionally and she did believe that she and her daughter will not come to any harm with police around.

But she did not bargain for her daughter to be abducted and taken as a hostage and worse made into a balika vadhu.

Now she knows what she is up against so she would stay away from Akheraj but she is also the kind of person if she believed that someone came to harm because of her she would go all out and that's what she is doing.

Her daughter who is as impulsive as her parents are followed her example.

Both mother and daughter are doing this for Jagya and his wife and they are going along with Jagya trusting him to bring them back safely along with Ganga.

Dangerous situation - caluculated risks because either ways they stand to lose.

Quote

Missesha

@Missesha

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
This is a very high risk. Anandi is criticised till now for taking Nandini to the marriage venue. And this is 100 times more dangerous as a desperate man is waiting with a gun and his real target is Nimboli.

And one cant legally take a minor for this purpose of exchange even if the intention is only to lure.

It is like tying a lamb to a tree to lure a tiger.

Anandi and jagya's stands are not comparable. Anandi had put herself and her child in a dangerous position while Jagya is forcibly put in that position. There is a huge difference.

Jagya ended up creating enmity with Akheraj Singh while doing his job as MLA, and for which Akhiraj planned and plotted a revenge strategy. Having left with no option, Jagya decided to take the three women with him to save one. He tried everything else before risking their lives and now also he has planned out something where he hopes to bring everyone safe. (his letter to Anant is indicative of some planning).

Anandi also ended up creating enmity with Akhiraj while doing her duty and she is not criticised for doing her duty, but for not taking basic safety precautions that any sensible mother would do for her sick six months old baby.

No mother in her right mindset would take her child to an unknown place, especially if she didn't know how long it would take there and what kind of circumstances they may end up facing.

Had Akhiraj kidnapped Anandi's daughter at a later date as a planned revenge, then Anandi wouldn't have been blamed. But here she was snatched because the kid was present right at the moment of fire. Anandi made Akhiraj's revenge easy..

Even Amol was kidnapped as a revenge on Anandi but for that Anandi was not blamed. While Amol's kidnap was unavoidable, Nandini's wasn't.

-------

For now, I like this plot. I don't really see anyone wrong here. Jagya has taken a risk and it may not be right, but he didn't really have an option. I don't think it's easy for anyone to give up or to say 'kill my wife' without even making efforts to save her.

In Anandi's case even if Pooja's marriage had happened, there was always an option to nullify it later. For that, a poor little infant need not be sacrificed.

Edited by Missesha - 9 years ago

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 8

Wrong

Fundamentally wrong

Related Topics

Explore Topics