Fundamentally wrong - Page 4

Originally posted by: SPuja

Present situation - J, Anandi and Mangala all r wrong in taking Nimboli with them. But at least Mangala and J tried another option before. It's not social work - it's trying to save Ganga and perhaps he has planned to save everyone but it's still risky. What anandi did was criminal negligence without even thinking about the child - there was simply no need to watch that bullets tamasha - any stray bullet could have injured the child.

Originally posted by: Missesha

How was Amol's kidnap different to Ganga's? Both happened because the kidnapper / Abductor wanted to take revenge with their respective family members who caused them some kind of losses. i.e. Jagya and Anandi.

But Jagya and Anandi were doing their duty. And they didn't foolishly expose their family members at the crime scene.

Anandi taking Nandini to was rather foolish, because there was no need.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

One's child is one's property and no mother does anything intentionally to harm her own baby. If something happens to the baby, it is due to unavoidable circumstances. Nobody has any business to poke their noses between such a personal matter.

Originally posted by: SPuja

No, there are mothers who kill their own child. A child can't be called property - a child is a living being - the mother is caretaker till the child becomes independent. The bond is strong and generally a mother will not let any harm come to her child - but if the child is harmed due to negligence of mother - it can't be defended saying so what - it was her child.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

You are clevery escaping certain things. Anandi did not kill her child.

You are equating criminal negligence with criminal activity.

Originally posted by: SPuja

I didn't equate criminal negligence with anything else. All I said that the child can't be said as mother's property, a mother generally cares for her child but there are mothers who even kill their child. You are deliberately going round and round just to defend an indefensible action of Anandi.