Fundamentally wrong - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

73

Views

4.4k

Users

14

Likes

192

Frequent Posters

leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: Missesha

@ Leaves, No I am not giving a clean chit to Jagya. He is risking too much and he may not be right, but I can' blame him simply because his decision to risk so much, is a thoughtful decision taken as a last resort.



I am blaming Anandi, because hers was a decision taken in a spur of a moment and it wasn't taken as a last resort. She always had the option of securing Nandini, before setting out for her mission.

Anandi is being criticised, simply for being unthoughtful.



A bad decision taken after much thought cant be justified.
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#22
Why police had to ask Anandi to go from there as she has an infant in her arms? Why not anandi thought this herself? And even after that - she didn't take the child to safety but watching the tamasha there. And we are told that she's selfless😕
Missesha thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

If Nandini was not kidnapped, anandi would not have been blamed endlessly for taking the girl to her workplace. That means anth bhala tho sab bhala.

Yes ofcourse she would still be wrong for taking her child to a dangerous place, but she wouldn't be blamed for a kidnap that would have never happened.
Or alternatively, had the kidnapped happened at a later date, as part of Akhiraj's planned revenge on Anandi for stopping balvivah (even if N was not present at the crime scene), then also Anandi WOULD NOT have been blamed.
leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: SPuja

Why police had to ask Anandi to go from there as she has an infant in her arms? Why not anandi thought this herself? And even after that - she didn't take the child to safety but watching the tamasha there. And we are told that she's selfless😕



You are still stuckup with anandi. Why dont you analyse the present situation just as you do for anandi?

Nimboli is a minor and Jagya is an MLA and a lawmaker. He is not some wannabe social worker. He is accountable.
Edited by leavesandwaves - 9 years ago
leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: Missesha

Yes ofcourse she would still be wrong for taking her child to a dangerous place, but she wouldn't be blamed for a kidnap that would have never happened.

Or alternatively, had the kidnapped happened at a later date, as part of Akhiraj's planned revenge on Anandi for stopping balvivah (even if N was not present at the crime scene), then also Anandi WOULD NOT have been blamed.



By this you agree that it was an accident. Then why blame anandi relentlessly? She lost only her own child not someone else's.
Edited by leavesandwaves - 9 years ago
Missesha thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves



A bad decision taken after much thought cant be justified.

Fair enough. I have no issues if you think jagya should be blamed because Anandi was.
In my perspective, I don't see jagya left with a better alternative than this so I sympathise with him. I did see Anandi was left with a better alternative than what she opted for.

I have already argued all those points and tried to share my perspective. More than that each to their own.

I can't blame J now, just as I never blamed Anandi for Amol's kidnap.
Missesha thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves



By this you agree that it was an accident. Then why blame anandi relentlessly? She lost only her own child not someone else's.


No I don't agree that, it was an unforeseen accident.. Please re-read my posts and you might figure out at what point I am blaming Anandi.

-------

And so what if she lost only her child. Is her child a lifeless property that Anandi can play with as she wishes, back then and even now?
Edited by Missesha - 9 years ago
leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: Missesha

Fair enough. I have no issues if you think jagya should be blamed because Anandi was.

In my perspective, I don't see jagya left with a better alternative than this so I sympathise with him. I did see Anandi was left with a better alternative than what she opted for.

I have already argued all those points and tried to share my perspective. More than that each to their own.

I can't blame J now, just as I never blamed Anandi for Amol's kidnap.



Amol's kidnap was different. Here Jagya's is a bad decision as a lawmaker just like Shiv's decision to go for the terrorist when police are there. How can you club the two together?
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves



You are still stuckup with anandi. Why dont you analyse the present situation just as you do for anandi?

Nimboli is a minor and Jagya is an MLA and a lawmaker. He is not some wannabe social worker. He is accountable.


Present situation - J, Anandi and Mangala all r wrong in taking Nimboli with them. But at least Mangala and J tried another option before. It's not social work - it's trying to save Ganga and perhaps he has planned to save everyone but it's still risky. What anandi did was criminal negligence without even thinking about the child - there was simply no need to watch that bullets tamasha - any stray bullet could have injured the child.
leavesandwaves thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: Missesha

No I don't agree, it was an accident. Please re-read my posts and you might figure out at what point I am blaming Anandi.

-------

And so what if she lost only her child. Is her child a lifeless property that Anandi can play with as she wishes, back then and even now?



One's child is one's property and no mother does anything intentionally to harm her own baby. If something happens to the baby, it is due to unavoidable circumstances. Nobody has any business to poke their noses between such a personal matter.
Edited by leavesandwaves - 9 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".