Fundamentally wrong - Page 2

Originally posted by: tiny15

perfectly said & completely agree wid u.

Mn's idea was not foolish one nor J's blurting out it 2 Ak bcoz none knew that Bd will stop Ak from doing it & he knew all abt cops & their way & J & oders don't know if Bd knew all abt cops.

tho A's desire was not worng but her thinking that Ak only wants her & will release ganga in exchange of her was foolish wen Ak himself said he wanted all 4.A's desire 2 go in exchange of ganga is shown 2 show A as sacrificing queen.

and Mn's expressions were clear that she din't've any prob in going & her thinking in the car abt her blurting out 2 N was also clear abt it. she has only this grudge that they shudn't'd brought N wid them putting her in danger.

Anandi thought she did not have a choice back then too. Further she relied on police support.

Anandi was unwise back then if she thought she didn't have a choice. She wasn't inexperienced after all. A bigger price was and is still being paid by Nimboli for Anandi's foolishness. Anandi cannot be excused or sympathised with on the account that she turned out to be foolish.

Anandi thought she didn't have choice back then and took her daughter to that place. Had it been just that - it could still not her fault. But arguing gun and lathi holding men with an infant in her arms was more than foolish - she could have left the girl with the driver. She lost her daughter not when she was trying to stop the marriage but when she was watching the flying bullets tamasha. Her foolishness prooved too costly for the child.

Originally posted by: Missesha

Anandi was unwise back then if she thought she didn't have a choice. She wasn't inexperienced after all. A bigger price was and is still being paid by Nimboli for Anandi's foolishness. Anandi cannot be excused or sympathised with on the account that she turned out to be foolish.

A question was posed that why is Anandi being criticised and jagya not, despite being in the same situation.

Well, neither the situations are exactly same and neither is Jagya acting foolishly.

However, Anandi can't be blamed this time though.

Anandi did not anticipate and she also took some precaution like calling police just like Jagya is depending on Anant. And NImboli is a minor and it is unlawful to take a minor even if precautions are taken and this time the risk is definitely known and it is much more. If Kundan cant be kidnapped because he is a minor, how can Nimboli be placed in a dangerous known situation? That too when the outcome may not be favourable. And Jagya is also a lawmaker.

At that time also anandi was selfless and at this time also anandi is selfless. She always wanted to do something for a third party overlooking her self interest. Even for Kamli or Mangala, she would have done this. Or some unknown entity like Sarita. And she is called foolish.

People's real nature and weaknesses come out when they are in forced situation.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

Anandi did not anticipate and she also took some precaution like calling police just like Jagya is depending on Anant. And NImboli is a minor and it is unlawful to take a minor even if precautions are taken and this time the risk is definitely known and it is much more. If Kundan cant be kidnapped because he is a minor, how can Nimboli be placed in a dangerous known situation? That too when the outcome may not be favourable. And Jagya is also a lawmaker.

Originally posted by: Missesha

Whether Anandi anticipated anything or not, nothing justifies her taking her infant child to her place of work - especially a work place that she too was not aware of. Even if Akheraj wasn't as bad as he is, still Anandi should not have taken Nandini to stop child marriage. It's insensible of a mother.

The excuse that she didn't have time is not an acceptable one, because even if the marriage had happened she could have always annuled it.

Jagya has taken Nimboli, as a last choice and that too when the abductor has specifically asked for her. Taking Nandiini to stop bal vivah, was not Anandi's last choice. She had other choices.

The least she could have done is ask Ira or someone to collect N from mid-way, if she didn't want to go all the way home inorder to save time.

The problem is not what Anandi could have done, the problem is Anand cannot or doesn't want to think. She only prefers to act impulsively under her misguided sense of goodness.

You are giving a very clean chit to Jagya citing so many excuses.

If Nandini was not kidnapped, anandi would not have been blamed endlessly for taking the girl to her workplace. That means anth bhala tho sab bhala.

Anandi called up police before she reached there.

@ Leaves, No I am not giving a clean chit to Jagya. He is risking too much and he may not be right, but I can' blame him simply because his decision to risk so much, is a thoughtful decision taken as a last resort.