Nausena-Pt5-JA not Fiction-AKBAR-a TITLE?.P27+ MAHACHUCHAK BEGUM - P30 - Page 21

Thanks for sharing the interesting information abhay

Thank you very much abhay for sharing this interesting information...

Thank u abhay for this info... Very interesting 😳

Thanks for the wonderful info...

It means AKBAR title is already there in his name or later did people really gave him the title?

awesome abhay... i have too many questions that i myself forget what i want to ask... such an idiot right? xD anyways... whatever you mention its fair enough...

Originally posted by: aish321

Very interesting stuff on history here in this thread, appreciate all your efforts, guess it is so much fun in collecting information abt the past even if its difficult.

👏 you are a ⭐️

Just wanted to know if there will be another thread on Mah chuchak begum which seems to be the next track ?

Thanks Aish.

Already posted a lot on Mahachuchak Begum, last year.!!. A link.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/98657498

BTW, She was the one who sent the Vishkanya from Kabul , and was hand in glove with Abul Maali. We mentioned this 5 months back.😉

1.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/99995240
2.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/100533127

If possible, refer Old threads too. 'Coz Many things have been mentioned before also. 😊

Originally posted by: abhi786

Thanks for the wonderful info...
It means AKBAR title is already there in his name or later did people really gave him the title?

You're Welcome. It means his name was Jalal-ud-din Mohammed Akbar, from the starting.

Originally posted by: tamy267

very interesting Abhay...so he was born in 23rd November!! A Sagittarius by birth!? no wonder, Sagis r awesome...like me😉😆

ek sawal, iska matlab he was never given any title called "Akbar"? or is it his name was already Akbar but his Hindu awam gifted him it as title?😕 kyukii everyone says it was title given by his riyaya😕

Tamy,

The word "Akbar" was already suffixed in his name, by his father, Humayun. I have only given a probable explanation, in my comment, why the CV's have shown this to us, in this manner, despite the fact that, he had this name since birth.

So you see, this was a ' POSITIVE ' " Natkiya Rupanter / Creativity " to show his greatness. Otherwise, the CV's could have skipped this, EasilY.!!!!!. Natkiya Rupanter applies to BOTH the leads.!!.😉

@Underlined...Many things were said about his wife and HIM also. Just rewind your memory, 8 months back. I remember many things.🥱 @Bold...Woh to, I can see..😉.!!.

Originally posted by: najma123

awesome abhay... i have too many questions that i myself forget what i want to ask... such an idiot right? xD anyways... whatever you mention its fair enough...

I wish your questions are not too tough to answer. BTW, your first question on MA led to digging up of entire history of Maham Anga, her sons, daughter, father in law, mother in law, kinsmen, his husband.

Finally, something more on her. Adham married in 1559-60 to the elder daughter of Muhammed Baqi Khan. And his elder brother, Baqi Koka married after him in 1561, to the younger daughter of Muhammed baqi Khan. So, their wives were REAL sisters.

This was all about MA and her family.

Originally posted by: history_geek

Tamy,

The word "Akbar" was already suffixed in his name, by his father, Humayun. I have only given a probable explanation, in my comment, why the CV's have shown this to us, in this manner, despite the fact that, he had this name since birth.

So you see, this was a ' POSITIVE ' " Natkiya Rupanter / Creativity " to show his greatness. Otherwise, the CV's could have skipped this, EasilY.!!!!!. Natkiya Rupanter applies to BOTH the leads.!!.😉

@Underlined...Many things were said about his wife and HIM also. Just rewind your memory, 8 months back. I remember many things.🥱 @Bold...Woh to, I can see..😉.!!.