Why Anusuya Should Not Be Believed ? What She Had Against Sumer ?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

luckySnow

@luckySnow

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#61

Originally posted by: EtherealRati
dekhte hain kya hota hain...ispar main apne comments nahi dena chahoongi abhi. 😆

Agar Maine tum sabko real Roxana ke India ke bare mein khyaal read karwa diye to tum sabko bukhaar AA jayega😆 Rakhi bhool jayoge😆

Quote

surbhi tyagi

@EtherealRati

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 7 years ago

#62

Originally posted by: luckySnow

Agar Maine tum sabko real Roxana ke India ke bare mein khyaal read karwa diye to tum sabko bukhaar AA jayega😆 Rakhi bhool jayoge😆

haan maine padhi hain tumari kuch posts usse related...😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

surbhi tyagi

@EtherealRati

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 7 years ago

#63

I sooo love this oneee...Nupur style ..😊

Quote

ThePirateKing

@ThePirateKing

Voyager

Posted: 7 years ago

#64

The main issue is that Puru the king has not understood the seriousness of the matter and wants to pronounce the judgement on the same day. Sumer is a person who has been accused of being a traitor and being part of a conspiracy to kill the king and in the process has been preemptively killed.

Now that Anusuya has killed Sumer (no problems about this as Prevention is always better than Cure), the burden of proof is on Anusuya She acted instinctively and now she needs to be given time to prove that her instincts were correct and passing a judgement against her just because of lack of proof at the current instant would be incorrect.

Lachi has no reason to distrust her brother, so far atleast, so she is correct in demanding justice for what she thinks is a cold blooded murder.

Ideally Puru has to give Anusuya say 14-15 days to prove her theory (and being the king should put her under observation lest she try and escape, Anusuya won't but kings are supposed to think worst case scenario here) and if she is not able prove, decide the punishment. If she comes with the proof Lachi and Dasyus have to accept it.

I am not sure how the Creatives are trying to portray Puru. As of now Puru has been shown to be extremely impulsive, whereas in comparison Alex is shown to be using his brains (except when he faces Chanakya).

Edited by ThePirateKing - 7 years ago

Quote

ananda29

@ananda29

Navigator

Posted: 7 years ago

#65

Exactly, if the shoe was on the other foot, I mean if Olympia had seen a perceived enemy going towards Alexander, in the same way as Sumer, to assassinate Alexander, and she murdered him, would Alexander entertain any question to punish his mother and why not... she would be guilty just like Anusuya.

Would the fandom expect Olympia to be punished, not at all, there would be silence.

Was justice served for the death of the king Phillip... this would be justified by the fandom, I am sure.

So there is one rule for Alexander and his mother and another for Puru and Anusuya.

Maybe this is one of the comparison the CV is showing.

Great is Alexander and he shall prevail.

Dumb is Puru, the native king, and he and his mother should be punished in their own country.

We shall see... maybe a miracle shall come to light🤔

Quote

GumnaamHaiKoii

@GumnaamHaiKoii

Stunner

+ 29

Posted: 7 years ago

#66

I don't think she is wrong. Its hurting her that her brother is dead. She wants something to fill the hole ,to lessen the pain and sense of betrayal. Kanishk Shiv dutt tried no of times to kill Puru or even her but they got imprisoned the same could have been done with Sumer , Anusuya is a queen and earlier a princess of Reputated kingdoms . She must know how it works. She could have easily tackled Sumer . Not that it was a reflex action she spent good 5-7 mins to see Sumer going towards Puru and laachi . Things would have been different and maybe a lil better with she Anusuya had Buddhi and ViVek.

She is Raj Mata understood but it's Kings decision to declare and punish Rajdhrohi. None can take law in their hands. Esp when someone from royal family is involved..

As for laachi , she is no saint. I would have felt betrayed if I saw my brother dead soon after my marriage murdered in cold blood by my mil. My dead brother declared a Rajdhrohi without a solid proof just on basis that the offender never lies or does anything wrong. Bullshit !

Anusuya's intentions were absolutely right but her action . No they weren't.

Quote

GumnaamHaiKoii

@GumnaamHaiKoii

Stunner

+ 29

Posted: 7 years ago

#67

Alexander's priorities are clear from day one. He is not goody two shoes. His mother comes first and then the rest. The point is made clear .

With Puru and Anusuya they have always emphasized on Matrubhomi. Raj drama etc. They have to live up to that . If not then they will be hypocrites . But never it proves that their love is less or false.

Its all about priorities in life

Even Lord ram had to sent his wife on exile due to Raj dhrama but that does not in any ways diminishes their love.

It would be great if Anusuya becomes proud of her son that he stood up for his responsibility as a king and pronounced verdict depending upon the situation if Anusuya gets proof or not.

But she should be proud and not hurt as her son is only living up to her ideology.

Son mom dynamics must not come in between.

If they do they are being hypocrites

And maybe then Laachi should feel hurt for husband wife relation is equally important and pious

Originally posted by: ananda29
Exactly, if the shoe was on the other foot, I mean if Olympia had seen a perceived enemy going towards Alexander, in the same way as Sumer, to assassinate Alexander, and she murdered him, would Alexander entertain any question to punish his mother and why not... she would be guilty just like Anusuya.
Would the fandom expect Olympia to be punished, not at all, there would be silence.
Was justice served for the death of the king Phillip... this would be justified by the fandom, I am sure.
So there is one rule for Alexander and his mother and another for Puru and Anusuya.
Maybe this is one of the comparison the CV is showing.
Great is Alexander and he shall prevail.
Dumb is Puru, the native king, and he and his mother should be punished in their own country.
We shall see... maybe a miracle shall come to light🤔

Quote

GumnaamHaiKoii

@GumnaamHaiKoii

Stunner

+ 29

Posted: 7 years ago

#68

Originally posted by: EtherealRati
What i am saying is laachi is not seeing it from a neutral point of view which you have actually agreed with through the above post. Why she wants punishment for anusuya without any proper research...why doesnt she gives anusuya benefit of doubt...anusuya isnt some random lady in her life...she knows anusuya well too. Laachi character before has been like that she supports right, no matter what but here her demanding punishment for anusuya directly is what i dont appreciate at all.
Seee if a random lady comes and tells me...toh ofcourse i wont believe...but if a lady who is a true deshbhakt,... jiske baarein mein main sab jaanti hoon...woh aayegi aur mujhse kahegi ki tumhara bhai deshdrohi tha aur isiliye maara hain maine usse...woh attack karne hi waala tha...maine apni aakhon se dekha hain...and i would have been not aware about my brother whereabouts at all ...as laachi toh tab se pourav rashtra mein hi hain...toh main kam se kam us lady ko benefit of doubt doongi...i understand main emotional hongi bahut apne bhai ko lekar...but still i will demand proper investigation on this and will want real truth to come out. Main us lady ke liye punishment nahi maangne lagoongi ek dam se ...especially when it is such a serious matter. And na hi court us lady ko punishment dega without proper investigation.

Her brother is killed in cold blood near her wedding havan kund without his any fault (from her pov) why will she think neutrally ? Why will she believe Anusuya over her brother whom she spent her whole life with? Why was her brother declared drag dhrihi and killed instantly without proving charge while Kanishk and Shiv dutt always got scott free. Shiv dutt was given second chance. Kanishk after all that drama was imprisoned but at least they got to live...

Here her brother is killed and accused of a serious crime which is not even proved.

I know you love Anusuya which is fine because we know who is at fault but laachi doesn't and I guess you are asking too much h from her as she is a human too and no saint.

Quote

sashashyam

@sashashyam

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#69

The rest of this post is very good, but I have a problem with the basic assumption, that it is for Anusuya to prove herself innocent . This is not correct.

According to the fundamental principle of universal jurisprudence, it is NOT for the accused, in this case Anusuya, to prove herself innocent. It is for the State, in this case Maharaja Purushottam, to prove her guilty.

Shyamala Cowsik

Originally posted by: ThePirateKing
The main issue is that Puru the king has not understood the seriousness of the matter and wants to pronounce the judgement on the same day. Sumer is a person who has been accused of being a traitor and being part of a conspiracy to kill the king and in the process has been preemptively killed.

Now that Anusuya has killed Sumer (no problems about this as Prevention is always better than Cure), the burden of proof is on Anusuya She acted instinctively and now she needs to be given time to prove that her instincts were correct and passing a judgement against her just because of lack of proof at the current instant would be incorrect.

Lachi has no reason to distrust her brother, so far atleast, so she is correct in demanding justice for what she thinks is a cold blooded murder.

Ideally Puru has to give Anusuya say 14-15 days to prove her theory (and being the king should put her under observation lest she try and escape, Anusuya won't but kings are supposed to think worst case scenario here) and if she is not able prove, decide the punishment. If she comes with the proof Lachi and Dasyus have to accept it.

I am not sure how the Creatives are trying to portray Puru. As of now Puru has been shown to be extremely impulsive, whereas in comparison Alex is shown to be using his brains (except when he faces Chanakya).

Edited by sashashyam - 7 years ago

Quote

sashashyam

@sashashyam

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#70

Besides all this, having a kneejerk animosity towards what is dubbed the "fandom for Alexander" makes for entirely predictable reactions and posts. Which is a pity

Morever, when I and many others who admire Alexander dubbed him a monster for using the iron bull on Chanakya, I did not see any recognition of the fact that there is no such blind "fandom".

Which was also a pity.

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: Radiant_Eyes_
Alexander's priorities are clear from day one. He is not goody two shoes. His mother comes first and then the rest. The point is made clear .

With Puru and Anusuya they have always emphasized on Matrubhomi. Raj drama etc. They have to live up to that . If not then they will be hypocrites . But never it proves that their love is less or false.

Its all about priorities in life

Even Lord ram had to sent his wife on exile due to Raj dhrama but that does not in any ways diminishes their love.

It would be great if Anusuya becomes proud of her son that he stood up for his responsibility as a king and pronounced verdict depending upon the situation if Anusuya gets proof or not.

But she should be proud and not hurt as her son is only living up to her ideology.

Son mom dynamics must not come in between.

If they do they are being hypocrites

And maybe then Laachi should feel hurt for husband wife relation is equally important and pious

Edited by sashashyam - 7 years ago

Quote

1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10

Why Anusuya Should Not Be Believed ? What She Had Against Sumer ? - Page 7

Related Topics

Explore Topics