Why Anusuya Should Not Be Believed ? What She Had Against Sumer ? - Page 8

Ok I think it is called mourning his death maybe over the top and yes I think. She got to high and mighty right know. That because I think. Her Mother is Queen of Duso. So like Mother and like Daughter maybe

i would just like to say one thing ...its nothing like that only for alexander his mom comes first...mom is such a relation joh har bacche ke liye hi sabse pehle aati hain...and puru is also a human being...i would have hated agar wahi ghisa pita dikhate...that raja dictates punishment for his mother due to lack of proofs and later somebody else comes and finds proofs...and she is declared innocent...like seriously...rishta toh kuchal jaata usmein and puru is one person who value his relations. And moreover sony alexander did killed his mother in the illusion too ...which proves that had olympia been an obstacle in his mission to rule the world...toh woh usse bhi maar dega...i mean that was what the illusion was for...to see if alexander can kill anyone and everyone who comes in between his success. Real alexander must have valued his mother more than success...in this show, its not like that...that people have got a right to compare puru and alex love for their mothers and keep alex love above puru's.

Originally posted by: Radiant_Eyes_

Her brother is killed in cold blood near her wedding havan kund without his any fault (from her pov) why will she think neutrally ? Why will she believe Anusuya over her brother whom she spent her whole life with? Why was her brother declared drag dhrihi and killed instantly without proving charge while Kanishk and Shiv dutt always got scott free. Shiv dutt was given second chance. Kanishk after all that drama was imprisoned but at least they got to live...

Here her brother is killed and accused of a serious crime which is not even proved.

I know you love Anusuya which is fine because we know who is at fault but laachi doesn't and I guess you are asking too much h from her as she is a human too and no saint.

for your information...she has herself been stating to puru about how neutral she is and just want the truth out..else she will be with him against dasyus...and if she cant be neutral...she should not expect puru to be neutral either kyonki like she is connected to her brother...puru is also connected to her mother...why should puru trust that sumer over his mother then ???...simple logic...sumer has done nothing good to win puru's trust...balki anusuya has actually done good things ...and if she expects him to be neutral because he is a maharaj then she also needs to be neutral because she is a maharani. And regarding kanishk and shivdutt and sumer comparision...i believe puru has already quite nicely illustrated...proving that laachi herself attacks to kill when her near one life is in danger. Just by saying that you love anusuya... will not change the fact that i had raised a point in my post.

Originally posted by: ananda29

Exactly, if the shoe was on the other foot, I mean if Olympia had seen a perceived enemy going towards Alexander, in the same way as Sumer, to assassinate Alexander, and she murdered him, would Alexander entertain any question to punish his mother and why not... she would be guilty just like Anusuya.

Would the fandom expect Olympia to be punished, not at all, there would be silence.

Was justice served for the death of the king Phillip... this would be justified by the fandom, I am sure.

So there is one rule for Alexander and his mother and another for Puru and Anusuya.

Maybe this is one of the comparison the CV is showing.

Great is Alexander and he shall prevail.

Dumb is Puru, the native king, and he and his mother should be punished in their own country.

We shall see... maybe a miracle shall come to light🤔

thankfully cvs have not shown something like that and anusuya puru relation has crossed this strongly...regarding had olympia been there...i can also bet that roxanne ke baarein mein koi soachta bhi nahi...i have seen people defending alexander watching her naked without her permission and asking her to dance with dancers for barsine...so obviously supporting his mom over his wife is no big deal as well...the simple justification is that he hasn't claimed to be mahaan ...so he can do everything...but then...i dont agree that people are supporting laachi in this post because they have problems with puru or anusuya or are just alexander fans...laachi has also been a nicely written character...and is more connected to viewers as compared to roxanne...so its normal for people to side her too...when i open a post...i dont wait to hear all like opinions...i like when discussions take place ...but obviously in a respectful manner...not like that someone comes into the discussion and start saying you are saying this because you love anusuya...when i am giving points...i expect to be replied with points as well...i wont say there is a fandom over here because we are hardly 14-15 people here ...so its merely about that with some people we agree and on with some we don't. The good thing is that no one in the forum keeps grudges on things and nobody is boycotted to share their opinions.

Originally posted by: Radiant_Eyes_

I don't think she is wrong. Its hurting her that her brother is dead. She wants something to fill the hole ,to lessen the pain and sense of betrayal. Kanishk Shiv dutt tried no of times to kill Puru or even her but they got imprisoned the same could have been done with Sumer , Anusuya is a queen and earlier a princess of Reputated kingdoms . She must know how it works. She could have easily tackled Sumer . Not that it was a reflex action she spent good 5-7 mins to see Sumer going towards Puru and laachi . Things would have been different and maybe a lil better with she Anusuya had Buddhi and ViVek.

She is Raj Mata understood but it's Kings decision to declare and punish Rajdhrohi. None can take law in their hands. Esp when someone from royal family is involved..

As for laachi , she is no saint. I would have felt betrayed if I saw my brother dead soon after my marriage murdered in cold blood by my mil. My dead brother declared a Rajdhrohi without a solid proof just on basis that the offender never lies or does anything wrong. Bullshit !

Anusuya's intentions were absolutely right but her action . No they weren't.

i don;t feel anusuya needs any buddhi aur vivek...i am happy with whatever she is. Puru has himself proved in the show that how her action was very much correct. So i dont need to add more.

Originally posted by: Radiant_Eyes_

Alexander's priorities are clear from day one. He is not goody two shoes. His mother comes first and then the rest. The point is made clear .

With Puru and Anusuya they have always emphasized on Matrubhomi. Raj drama etc. They have to live up to that . If not then they will be hypocrites . But never it proves that their love is less or false.

Its all about priorities in life

Even Lord ram had to sent his wife on exile due to Raj dhrama but that does not in any ways diminishes their love.

It would be great if Anusuya becomes proud of her son that he stood up for his responsibility as a king and pronounced verdict depending upon the situation if Anusuya gets proof or not.

But she should be proud and not hurt as her son is only living up to her ideology.

Son mom dynamics must not come in between.

If they do they are being hypocrites

And maybe then Laachi should feel hurt for husband wife relation is equally important and pious

so basically if you are goody two shows...you should forget about all your relations and punish your mother or else you are hypocrite. Sorry, i dont support that. I dint saw the point made clear in olympia case either...as i mentioned above how alexander did choosed success over olympia in his illusion.

Both Porus and Alex love their mothers...no need of competitions...😊

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Besides all this, having a kneejerk animosity towards what is dubbed the "fandom for Alexander" makes for entirely predictable reactions and posts. Which is a pity

Morever, when I and many others who admire Alexander dubbed him a monster for using the iron bull on Chanakya, I did not see any recognition of the fact that there is no such blind "fandom".

Which was also a pity.

Shyamala Aunty

red- trust me alex was supported on bull thing as well di...i can show posts...only you were the one who clearly came out and said you find him a monster for that...slowly slowly people did agreed with you later on ...that i won't deny, especially because the scene went in detail ...and it was a truly disgusting scene. But di this can't be denied that alexander is supported on many of his wrong acts too on this forum just because people admire him...and all the hasi mazak i.e. trolling is always reserved for puru.

Originally posted by: luckySnow

Both Porus and Alex love their mothers...no need of competitions...😊

i completely agree. 😊

Originally posted by: Sandy6018

Ok I think it is called mourning his death maybe over the top and yes I think. She got to high and mighty right know. That because I think. Her Mother is Queen of Duso. So like Mother and like Daughter maybe

relax dear...nothing like that...things are alright now.