Kool's Commentary : Oct 6 PR - Page 7

@kools: I understood some of what you wrote, some part I didn't understand, like why is Savita being compared to Dharmu. Anyway thanks for answering.

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

That was a long long tiem ago when savita would use that sort of language .

Archana has changed a lot since then ..

Look how much trouble happened between manav and Ajit , they are best buddies now ...

People change and so do circumstances .

Savita wants Archana to be away from her son but I don't think she will ever use that kind of language for her now ...

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Really ? Only that day she called her PANOTI ..........and scene was same , Archu listening chupchaap to all bakwas .............what has changed ?

I think Archu thought like ME for a change, 😃 putting herself in Savita's shoes (or chappals rather) and thought- right now she is a scared, angry mother, her anger is understandable. Her anger won't be controlled, shouting will lead to more shouting- she needs to be explained things softly and consoled. Let me not shout at her now. She will herself realise later that she was wrong.

😆

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

@kools: I understood some of what you wrote, some part I didn't understand, like why is Savita being compared to Dharmu. Anyway thanks for answering.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Savita is NOT being compared to Dharmu . ARCHU's reaction to CHARACTER ALLEGATIONS IS BEING COMPARED .She takes it from some she DOESNT TAKE IT FROM SOME . She is SELECTIVELY CONVENIENT ABOUT HER RAGE BOUTS . Thats where comparison comes in and where PR is viewed as totality .Now see if u can understand or drop it

Sorry for making you angry.

With whatever is happening in savita's home , she should be left alone ..

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

@kools: I understood some of what you wrote, some part I didn't understand, like why is Savita being compared to Dharmu. Anyway thanks for answering.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

I think Archu thought like ME for a change, 😃 putting herself in Savita's shoes (or chappals rather) and thought- right now she is a scared, angry mother, her anger is understandable. Her anger won't be controlled, shouting will lead to more shouting- she needs to be explained things softly and consoled. Let me not shout at her now. She will herself realise later that she was wrong.

😆

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

This wud hold valid if there hAD been instances where she had given Savita good earlier .As a matter of fact , she doesnt . SHE ALWAYS BEHAVES THIS WAY ONLY .So ur argument doesnt hold water😃 btw ur defending her at wRONG time in my opinion purely😆 When she sUCKS ur defending . Her intention is rite her methods sUCK

Kools, the above thing was meant as a JOKE. See the smiley in the end.

And I have been crying hoarse since yesterday that I have not defended Archana that her methods of slapping etc. have been right. I only felt that her anger was understandable. And I said it bcos I'm no hypocrite- everyone loses temper and everyone makes mistakes when angry. Here anger stemmed from a genuine cause too, I felt- a person whom she loves is in jail, and under risk of torture and even death. Who will not get angry, is what I felt. With everyone saying I agree I agree yesterday to your comments, I thought at least I should put forward my two penny thoughts that everyone loses temper and does wrong things in life at times, purely on impulse. At that time, no one sits and analyses about right and wrong.

If you feel I'm 'defending' at wrong time and all, your opinion purely, I suppose I can't change it. But what to do- its my nature. I always think like this only.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Sorry for making you angry.