Kool's Commentary : Oct 6 PR - Page 14

Something more…

On my page 14 explanation point no. 2, I am wrong to assume the ability to determine a limit of 'taste'; In an open forum any person can have their likes or dislikes and to what ever extent they may feel exerted.

About SOTD post on page 5 here, (although I was caught completely unaware about this somewhat inappropriate posting, I don't hold anything against Tanya. One, the post was at it is an open post and in another open thread and hence visible to all. Two, Tanya is a guileless friend who did not do anything out of a sense of mischief and I respect her motives.) The starting para.. "as the episode progress…" is colourless in taste in view of some past discussion and I apologize. On this point, I agree with Kool's explanation to Nikita about the necessity to reference the previous incidences in a discussion or commentary.

This morning-afternoon-evening kind of involvement here can not be sustained- simply can not be afforded- by me. And the break is unavoidable so Kools greater authority in matters of serial is undisputed. But PR people are defo practicing some Jaadu-tona😆; what with I, a member of a lesser enlightened chauvinist sex being made to defend the actions of a lady in distress and Kool a redoubtable feminist (?) defending a chauvinist brute!😆 (Ha…ha…to think of that, in their most convoluted PR world, they are 'Sadofying' the marriage of most compatible couple while making a great success of two most incompatible- as shown initially- the third daughter!)

As it is, Kool, just as the coming episodes will be showing successive rounds of apologies on part of Archana and great distress in two other sisters' marital lives, you will be increasingly vindicated of your stand and I will stand convicted of a stupid burst of a foolish take of chivalry. But when thus victorious you will stand and perhaps at your caustic best; just spare a thought to the existence of a constituency who does think it wrong to subject a lady to some foul hollering by a capriciously selfish male, however much justified the provocation on the part of the churl, or the violent reaction unjustified by the dangerous fall outs or out boundary of decorum on part of the girl.

Saying this I retreat to a much needed and a very appropriate break, unless excited beyond control by some viewing (though planning a break there too.) with a firm belief that those friendship bonds which are formed innocently, naturally and with out any exertions do not slacken with such kind of trivialities.