Originally posted by: SaffyFlower
Ok,letz start from the start
Ajit entered and accused Archu of implicating Manav falsely -brave
Archu turns around immediately and accuses Dhammu of implicating Manav falsely-no,no she shud not point out a grave injustice? She shud immediately take an auto go to lawyer,go to police or just keep quiet?What is the diff between wat she did and ajit did?they questioned injustice.
If Tarun had found out and come to accuse the Ks -still brave -and he is no bro,BIl or gay partner.
If chawl cat,any other factory worker or even shinde the peon had found out and accused Dhammu it wud be brave,but archu who loves Manav,shud just not feel a thing about an injustice done to him??
WHO DECIDES WHO CAN POINT OUT AN INJUSTICE AND WHO CANNOT?
LAW AND ORDER IS EVERYBODY'S DUTY.That is why this country is going to the dogs.Just stand around and watch injustice,when that injustice one day come and knocks on UR own door,then scream this world is bad.Sorry,I dont subscribe to that cowardice.My sister refused to pay a 100 Rs.hafta to the local constable to get a passport,she dint get it for 2 yrs,lost an oppurtunity to work abroad,but today she has lived many countries abroad - We believe in strict karma. No one said she shud not question injustice . Did ANYONE ? I didnt see it . But some said dont get physical coz her sisters LIFE is involved just like Manavs , she too is human .Is that so wrong ?
Dhammu did a PUBLIC CRIME,its not his family drama going on any more.
After all,Satish now was on the verge of telling Archu himself.Why?Who is Manav to him?Gay partner or wat??Why is he showing concern and gets appreciated for it??
Everybody in the world has a right to call Dhammu and Jay and Satish unjust for trying to implicate Manav @this pt.Let him put up his defence that his family mattered,so he did it - Satish is saying that too.I am not saying ppl dont save their butts @others expense,but is it wrong?Yes it is,that is wat the law says.
If Archu had sided with her sisters like Sulo,it wud be justified,in case she decides to expose the conspiracy to free an innocent man,it is also justified.
And as a damaad,Dhammu insulted his in-laws,put archu's sagaai in jeopardy by accusing her of badnaam rishta in front of them.Was that right?He cud have told Sulo and Damo in private if he had genuine concern.But he used the words to silence Archu's questions,as usual he manipulated the situation,put himself above all.He hit below the belt,she hit him back.Tit for tat.So much for everybody being feminist here.Although I DONT subscribe to physical thappads by anybody,verbal thappad was deserving then I answered in SOTD but will copy paste in this thread
Dhammu asked - well,there is no evidence that manav is innocent,so why he cannot be considered guilty?
Manju taunted savita with the same thing -u r son murdered 2 guys,any proof he dint?Everybody was accusing Manju of being evil.How was Dhammu's statement different than hers?? Then praise Manju na. Theres a difference . Manju pICKED a fight . No one had accused her of anything . She did it for FUN .Dharmesh unwillingly was pulled into one and HAD TO DEFEND HIMSELF .He didnt do it for FUN , he did it to protect himself , he is not mahaan . We dont see him saying to all and sundry on the roads that manav killed two people , he maintains a dignified silence . Manju said it publicly coz she wanted to have fun at Manav , Archu and also Savitas expense . Neither did she say it to save her butt nor to defend herself .It was FUN .
Savita can feel like aggrieved on Manju's statement bcoz he is son but archu being in love cannot defend against the same point?History has proved a mashooka's junoon in love is also powerful as a mother's love to her son,even a friend can have junoon of be-intehaan dosti.
Now if u want to debate why archu loves manav,the love tap shud open and close only when marriage tap opens and closes,I will take it up on a different post.Love is an unsurmountable emotion,which is why love marriages are common -the love happens bfor marriage,marriage happening is not even confirmed when the love happens.Widows love their husbands even after he physically does not exist.Sorry I dont agree with ur mashookas junoon point at all .I agree to disagree here . If she has LOVE for him , first thing break ur engagement and fight wholeheartedly dont tell im not MASHOOKA but SUPERVISOR, that tHIS IS SUPERVISORS LOVE
And even Tarun caring for his friend is love.Archu caring for Manav is love.Love is love,it comes from the heart with no rules,the only string attached is the degree of caring.I dont disagree ,All Im saying , come out of the closet and declare Im mashooka .People will fall silent .They r not keeping silent coz she is pretending to be WIFE OF ANOTHER and acting like Mashooka of aNOTHER . The day she boldly becomes truthful to HERSELF , she earns my respect ..but she will go the POLITICALLY CORRECT WAY for long just like her mASHOOQUE is doing currently in jail by signing false declarations so she can marry a monster
When Savita caught satish and archu in the office together,and accused her as bachalan,Archu gave her a royal sounding.Satish took Archu aside and told her - words become important only when u choose to give importance.He himself ignored Savita's taunts and told Archu its not worth calling names back.But unfortunately they showed Savita turning a new leaf,resurrected her after the Rassi-Ghunghroo event,and savita turns miss goody 2 shoes just like Ajit turned mr.goody 2 shoes.Archu forgives ppl who apparently turn over a new leaf.Thats only one incident . Her BAS ! had hardly any effect on Savita .For a large part she tolerated vile abuse lOVINGLY , thats her character .And ur right , like Savita said , she will in two days forgive Dharmu and go back to maayka just like she forgave Manju after nokrani episode
Fan Fictions
Anupamaa
