Posted:
i dont agree wid wat samrath post:
i wil start from d start, it was archu who strtd yelling and shouting like mad,she dint even tryed to listen to dharmu, it was suloch who made her quite and tld her to wat dharmesh has to say.they r family and in family how much ever possible fights if dere shld b sorted out in a better rather way den wat archu did for a nobody called manav.and abt dharmesh allegations wat he tld her was truth he tld for him manaav is a normal human being who can mke mistakes (right)
he tld her he shld care for jay rther den manav(truth and right)
her rista s badnaam rishta(dis has beentld to her from almost every1 in d family and has been disussed in d forum 100 times)
manav is using u(discussed before) wat else he tld.so he deserves a slap for tat,so savita shld b hanged till death by archu upto now.
now wat archu tld him
u r a selfish businessman ,so y d hell r u wrking in d company get lost
u lost all d respect, u hav steep low in front of me(i will say who is tlking first see yrself and den others) is dis d way any1 tlks to ur bil,however wrong was he.did she saw suloch tlking to savita like dis wen she askd for dowry or abused dem,A FACT dharmesh was a gud husband,bil and sil, he deserves total respect.he is being selfish as a business man, fight wid him in a professional level not in personal level.i guess it was savita who called archu a s**t not dharmesh.dharmesh and family alwys respected her and her honesty if she cld convince dharmu to let manav get d job bck she cld atleast try to convince him and beleive me d whole k family wld hav supported her den.
