Kool's Commentary : Aug 13 PR - Page 9

Most of the women would take Savita's after her sons death . their sympathies would be with deshmukh's family . so Savita's transformation was accepted by the viewers .

Archu was also a like-able character , but the protest is as the manhanta is going over the broad .

Shavani needs a friend , who would help her see the realty & what mess she got herself into . Savita is cunning , she is playing with the vulnerability of her ex-dil and her so called future dil.

I guess she WILL become a MISTRESS after she makes physical love without the marraige label and since currently she has NOT done it exactly , she isn't ? So the making of love with eyes full day long doesn't count , sticking wet to each other in umbrella doesnt count neither does sleeping with head on chest . Pardon me for wrong choice of words . I always believed it was the THOUGHT that counts

Thought counts very much but only if they are impure thoughts. And I don't think when they are looking at each other they are going through impure thoughts in their heads.

............and running after a man who threw u out and is still not commiting in a sINGLE word , was pretty pretty shameful wasnt it .

It didn't look like Manav threw Archana out on the day of divorce or on the day of Manav-Shravani wedding. Both times it was Archana who voluntarily walked out and stayed away.

Arien suffering is due to BAD KARMA . And we see Archana suffering just like Shravni. To date we have NOT seen her totally happy . Her state of denial when she came from Bangalore was hardly happiness .Giving up ur marraige coz ur pati is on a spree of dumping legal wives and becoming a hero by saving unwed gals was foolish karma which gave her the results..........now stand , watch , pine , and sUFFER .

Archana has looked happy and content since the divorce, don't see her suffering at all coz of her decision of divorce.

Becoming the other woman was HER karma, her own doing. So many people tried to make her see sense.

After seeing Shravani being engaged to Manav and being called DIL of Deshmukh house, after witnessing Manav putting sindoor on Shravani, after knowing that Shravani is in love with Manav and after letting Shravani believe that Manav belongs to her, if Archana had listened to so many people and stayed married to Manav then Archana would be doing wrong. It would be treachery.

FOOLISH KARMA cannot be called good karma at all. When u marry u make promise in front of God. She broke her promise to GOd so her act goes under Bad Karma, not good. That promise has some meaning.

Just because ultimately Archana called for divorce does not make her the only one responsible for divorce. In fact she is not at all responsible for this karma, its Manav, Shravani, Girishji and Savita who actually are responsible for the divorce.

Foolishness is not a laudable trait at all and currently what she is doing, sleeping on Manavs chest when he is engaged to another when she had option of calling his sister, when he is NOT commiting in any way, is again bad karma.

Archana had gone through great deal of trauma after finding Manav lying in his own blood on street, taking him to hospital and getting him treated. She had not slept properly for several days while looking after Manav. She was exhaused and dozed of and ended up with her head on Manav's shoulder. Its not like she was intently sleeping in that position. Archana's karma here is that she is looking after an injured and hurt person and this cannot be a bad karma.

the discussion has been goin back and forth and while I have been tempted to join and share my opinions (especially Arien's post) I hesitate becasue no one in this serial is acting rationally and so defending a character's choices are difficult to do based on logic.

In my opinion:

a) I cannot feel anger, hatred or disappointment towards Shravani however bad they show her becasue her actions are in line with a personality - a self absorbed spoilt brattish immature girl. motherhood does not wisen you up overnight. hard knocks in life do. I see beyond shravani's irritating visual traits and in her insecurity, I see her vulnerability. there are many that disagree with me and that is fine.

b) I am disappointed in archana and manav deeply - I think they set bad examples. these are two individuals who from early on in their youth have had to shoulder responsibility and had to be guidance counsellors for their younger siblings. thsi role, this early responsiblity made them mature, thoughtful people who thought before they acted (unliek shravani or varsha or sachin who are very immature and act before they think) YET after all their pondering, all their soul seraching all their maturity they came up with this illogical lame brained lose-lose solution. their attractiona dn lvoe for one another will not allow them to implement the sacrifice they are trying to make. which si human and in my mind understandable. AGAIN INSTEAD OF REALIZING their predicament and the hopelessness of their solution, they persist with the same solution and not only that they express their frustations on bystanders and peopel around them. Unfair I say. Their solution is ruining 4 lives and 3 families. Unfair again I say.

we all have our own point of view. what's important is not which angle we are looking at the problem but the fact that no matter which angle we look from- the solution is wrong. it is a lose-lose solution

If I am to fall in love again with these two characters and defend them again with passion then they must prove worthy of that loyalty. they must act their age. I do not want them toa ct immature or go the other end of the spectrum and act liek senior citizens ready to live their lives as retirees (which is what they are doing now).

they need to decide to reconcile, tell shravani te marriage will not happen and move on. Any other solution is unacceptable.

we can discuss their decisions till the cows come home yet all three of htem will be shortchanged by the current solution.

hope

Originally posted by: Arien_03

I guess she WILL become a MISTRESS after she makes physical love without the marraige label and since currently she has NOT done it exactly , she isn't ? So the making of love with eyes full day long doesn't count , sticking wet to each other in umbrella doesnt count neither does sleeping with head on chest . Pardon me for wrong choice of words . I always believed it was the THOUGHT that counts

Thought counts very much but only if they are impure thoughts. And I don't think when they are looking at each other they are going through impure thoughts in their heads.

............and running after a man who threw u out and is still not commiting in a sINGLE word , was pretty pretty shameful wasnt it .

It didn't look like Manav threw Archana out on the day of divorce or on the day of Manav-Shravani wedding. Both times it was Archana who voluntarily walked out and stayed away.

Arien suffering is due to BAD KARMA . And we see Archana suffering just like Shravni. To date we have NOT seen her totally happy . Her state of denial when she came from Bangalore was hardly happiness .Giving up ur marraige coz ur pati is on a spree of dumping legal wives and becoming a hero by saving unwed gals was foolish karma which gave her the results..........now stand , watch , pine , and sUFFER .

Archana has looked happy and content since the divorce, don't see her suffering at all coz of her decision of divorce.

Becoming the other woman was HER karma, her own doing. So many people tried to make her see sense.

After seeing Shravani being engaged to Manav and being called DIL of Deshmukh house, after witnessing Manav putting sindoor on Shravani, after knowing that Shravani is in love with Manav and after letting Shravani believe that Manav belongs to her, if Archana had listened to so many people and stayed married to Manav then Archana would be doing wrong. It would be treachery.

FOOLISH KARMA cannot be called good karma at all. When u marry u make promise in front of God. She broke her promise to GOd so her act goes under Bad Karma, not good. That promise has some meaning.

Just because ultimately Archana called for divorce does not make her the only one responsible for divorce. In fact she is not at all responsible for this karma, its Manav, Shravani, Girishji and Savita who actually are responsible for the divorce.

Foolishness is not a laudable trait at all and currently what she is doing, sleeping on Manavs chest when he is engaged to another when she had option of calling his sister, when he is NOT commiting in any way, is again bad karma.

Archana had gone through great deal of trauma after finding Manav lying in his own blood on street, taking him to hospital and getting him treated. She had not slept properly for several days while looking after Manav. She was exhaused and dozed of and ended up with her head on Manav's shoulder. Its not like she was intently sleeping in that position. Archana's karma here is that she is looking after an injured and hurt person and this cannot be a bad karma.

Coconut heads😆

mera dimag gol gol ghum raha hai...like this🤔 11th Oct😍

Slaps wont do the trick for ArMan...hasnt Damo already slapped manav...anything happened?

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Also I dont buy the EXHAUSTION excuse at all .In sleep one understands when one touches a human body .Truth is she enjoys being near him even in her sleep ,If he is not there physically , she hugs his ALBUM which has his photos . She is obviously very STARVED for his company .

Originally posted by: gaurimisha

mera dimag gol gol ghum raha hai...like this🤔 11th Oct😍

what's gonna happen on 11th Oct 😕