"LINGAA" movie review
I watched this movie as a sudden, impulsive act on the 2nd day of its release in a theatre abroad.
It was an average movie for me...
less boring in content when compared to the current films like Vijay's "Kaththi" and Shahrukh's "Happy New Year"...
but not as crisp and as delightful as "Padayappa","Baasha or "Thalapathi".
Plus Points:
1. The biggest plus point of watching any new Rajini movie in the theatre - is the Rajini Euphoria -
the ticket/ waiting queue was so looong (even if you had booked online!)...
with the occasional "Dei Machchan...I got the tickets! I got the tickets!" hyper-excitement to people clicking selfies near Rajni's "Lingaa" poster outside the theatre.
The crowd was gigantic. The whistles were loud. It was housefull.
This was a very, very rare sight for a random multiplex theatre abroad showing an occasional Indian film.
The euphoria lasted even after the movie ended.
I was half-asleep as my husband was driving me back home late in the night, when I realized a car driving next to us was speeding away past the red signal in traffic!
Well, the driver came to his senses quite soon and hit the brakes in the next red signal...
narrowly escaping a fine by the police.
This is what happens to the common man post-watching a Rajini movie...
suddenly, everyone gets over-emotional and over-impulsive!😆
2. Rajinikanth's mesmerizing energy and charisma - is still intact!
3. Some punch dialogues were nice to hear...with good pearls of wisdom.
I don't know if it will be adored by the masses...but it was listened to with respect in the audience.
4. The cinematography by R. Rathnavelu was beautiful.
5. British actress Lauren Irwin as the collector's wife in the pre-Independence portion.
She is the pleasant surprise of this movie and is good in her short role.
Hers is a side character role with only 2-3 minutes of dialogue towards the end climax...
but for some reason, I remember her role more than the significant others.
Minus Points:
1. The make-up - Rajini looked like the new MGR avatar...colourful clothes and shoes, youthful make-up...
yet he still looked old.
Sometimes, his "grandson" role looked older than his "grandfather" role.
How awkward is that?
2. The comedy - some of Santhanam's one-liners made me smile...not laugh.
The whole concept of hero with 4 side-kick friends has been done and dusted with to death.
I don't know if it works anymore.
Personally, I felt the last memorable comedy done in a Rajini movie was with Vadivelu in "Chandramukhi". After that, none of the comedy tracks in his films stood out for me.
Maybe I've grown too serious...but comedy track here is just average.
3. The suspense of political entry - Will he or won't he enter politics?
There were many dialogues in the film to raise political interest in Rajini's thoughts here.
It was a build-up post-Padayappa...since both films come from the same director.
The suspense has been going on for nearly 20 years now...it made me yawn.
4. The music - AR Rahman was clearly half-asleep while composing for this film. Except for a God song and a sad song, nothing else stood out in my memory.
5. The length - I bet you will look at your watch at least 4 times while watching this movie.
The movie is 3 hours long...and most of it, is at snail's pace.
6. The villain - Jagapati Babu is just meh. Average. Anyone could have played his role maybe better than him. Lacked the charisma of a villainous Suman, Raghuvaran or Ramya Krishnan.
7. The little characters - it is a Rajinikanth film and there were so many tiny guest appearances in this movie with insignificant roles. It was a waste of time and a waste of characters.
8. The heroines - if you can't make the hero look younger, you can make the heroines look a little older, right?
I guess that's okay, otherwise Rajnikanth will end up looking like a paedophile instead of a hero.
Anushka and Sonakshi do what they are suppose to do in a Rajinikanth film.
The romantic dialogues sound cheesy...sometimes even creepy.
But it is an honour to work in a Rajinikanth film and they take their work seriously.
Personally, my vote went for Lauren...and she hardly interacted with Rajini in the movie!
Forget the chemistry, Rajinikanth was clearly uncomfortable romancing his heroines in this film.
It was quite obvious for everyone to see.
There was a time when he could create tension with his heroine...
and it came off well because off-screen they were great co-stars and had good understanding.
Here, Anushka throws herself at him and he runs away in mercy.😆
I felt sorry for him.
Thinking about it, even in the 1980 film "Johnny", Rajinikanth played a similar character of a petty thief in a double role.
But gosh, that movie was truly memorable...amazing songs and direction...
showing the psyche and guilt of a ruthless thief who falls in love with a good soul in Sridevi.
I liked the way both his guilt and his feelings for Sridevi conflict within him and make him uncomfortable in this scene below from "Johnny".
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Avd5o0j_yv8[/YOUTUBE]
Here in "Lingaa", the suspense, the stealing, the romance, the comedy, the plotline felt like...time-pass.
So I guess watching this film should be just that...time-pass.
Overall, any other lead actor could have done this movie too.
But because Rajini holds the title role...it deserves to be watched at least once.
Edited by spain - 10 years ago