WHY DID YUDHISHTHIR GO TO HEAVEN?please reply - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

88

Views

18k

Users

38

Likes

377

Frequent Posters

starsshinex thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#31
Yudi Ji has been following dharm all his life. We cannot overlook his good deeds and just blame him for the mistake. He was a human too. Humans do make mistakes and what he did is unforgivable BUT like many others told, Yudi Ji did repent for his mistakes during his exile. We, people who are living in the 21st century, have no rights to say that Yudi Ji didn't deserve to go to heaven. We have to agree that Yudi Ji did a lot more good in comparable to the bad! If the god himself was with him, who are we judge and question as in why he went to heaven? Well, I just have a question! If Dury and gang who did sins all through their life can go to heaven, WHY not Yudi Ji who did so many goods does not deserve to go the heaven?

P.S: This was just my honest opinion. I wasn't intending to hurt anyone. Thanks.
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#32
Exactly! If Yudhishtira deserved hell then where are "we going to" send Duri.Dushi and Co. ??
DharmaPriyaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: Medha.S

Exactly! If Yudhishtira deserved hell then where are "we going to" send Duri.Dushi and Co. ??


And also think that, where should we the great kaliyug people will go 😆
DrModel thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: Medha.S

In Srimad Bhagwatam, Yudhishtira is treated with even more respect than in MB.
Every discussion of Dharma includes him. Some of the chapters all about Yudhishtira and other Pandavs are his brothers.
It wont go down peoples throat here 🤣


I just wish people would READ.

Like PoI, Mrityunjay and Ajaya are NOT the Mahabharat or the SMB

I mean if it is difficult to read KMG or Ramesh Menon or RK Narayan just READ Jaya. BUT READ the MB and the SMB.

I mean I have read Critical edition, SMB, RK Narayan version, ISKCON version, RM version (which is basically KMG because it is heavily and extensively referenced from KMG) just READ even ONE of these. And in all these I fail to see the SHADES OF GREY that are proclaimed off of rooftops in this forum.

Sri Krishna plainly in RM's MB calls Duri EVIL and in the SMB too.

Its there for the world to see. And if RM is so heavily/extensively KMG referenced, and as per the forum KMG= Vyasa then RM indirectly also equals Vyasa.

NOW, RM and SMB compare Yudi to Sri Ram (YES, the 7th avatar of Narayan Namo Namah) so are we now saying Vyasa was wrong? Rishi Markand was wrong? SMB is wrong??
Basically then by this twisted warped logic, Gita is wrong, Hinduism in its entirety then is wrong.
ERM!! KUCH BHI!!!!

Arrghhh; I dunno whether to laugh or cry
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: Urmila11


And also think that, where should we the great kaliyug people will go 😆


🤣No salvation for us, If Yudhishtira is off to hell even after being away from anger almost all his life, always being compassionate towards his cousins even after they made him slave and stripped him off his possessions ( Seriously, he still could have the decency to have Duryodhna rescued even though Duryodhna and Karna had come to the forest just to laugh at his misery and despair🤢)
He was always so forgiving, kept forgiving and giving.
Never spoke against his elders, never said insulting words towards Dhrit, Bhishma, Drona etc. even after Dhritrashtra acted like a 🤬 towards them. ( Unlike some other great men who left no chance to insult them)

And so much more, but we people can't even claim to have done even this much.

Alas,I am to be a scorned spirit for the rest of eternity, not even good enough for hell.
Edited by Medha.S - 11 years ago
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#36
Yudi went to heaven. Let him go. No problem.
Going to heaven is not the highest aim of a soul's life. Getting liberated from the cycle of births- rebirths & merging in the Supreme consciousness is the final aim of each soul.
One can repent, do penance & clear their karmas. If through penance people can get boon & get what they want, then why not Yudi.
The question is why did only he reached heaven in the same body. May be because his one track mind, didn't allow him to make other mistakes then Dhyut & Naro va kunjaro va, in the war.
I really wish if we caould see the account of our Karmas & know for what we are enjoying, suffering then knowing answers of such questions would have been easy. Untill then only based on whatever bit of we know, understand, experience, we can only analyse the event & the results. The actual event has already taken place to know the result.



Edited by mnx12 - 11 years ago
DharmaPriyaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: Medha.S


🤣No salvation for us, If Yudhishtira is off to hell even after being away from anger almost all his life, always being compassionate towards his cousins even after they made him slave and stripped him off his possessions ( Seriously, he still could have the decency to have Duryodhna rescued even though Duryodhna and Karna had come to the forest just to laugh at his misery and despair🤢)
He was always so forgiving, kept forgiving and giving.
Never spoke against his elders, never said insulting words towards Dhrit, Bhishma, Drona etc. even after Dhritrashtra acted like a 🤬 towards them. ( Unlike some other great men who left no chance to insult them)

And so much more, but we people can't even claim to have done even this much.

Alas,I am to be a scorned spirit for the rest of eternity, not even good enough for hell.


Medha, I always become overwhelmed with Yudhishthir's forgiveness ⭐️ I believe that Krishna always gave him the mental power & tolerance living within his mind 😊 in the dice hall where everybody blames him, I bow to him only for his tolerance & forgiveness 👏👏 if I had 1% of this then I could get the vision of my darling Lord Krishna for sure 😳😃 we can't take something from the great devotees of Lord but can blame them 😭 oh Lord! Show mercy to these little creatures of you!
varaali thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#38

Originally posted by: DrModel


I just wish people would READ.

Like PoI, Mrityunjay and Ajaya are NOT the Mahabharat or the SMB

I mean if it is difficult to read KMG or Ramesh Menon or RK Narayan just READ Jaya. BUT READ the MB and the SMB.

I mean I have read Critical edition, SMB, RK Narayan version, ISKCON version, RM version (which is basically KMG because it is heavily and extensively referenced from KMG) just READ even ONE of these. And in all these I fail to see the SHADES OF GREY that are proclaimed off of rooftops in this forum.

Sri Krishna plainly in RM's MB calls Duri EVIL and in the SMB too.

Its there for the world to see. And if RM is so heavily/extensively KMG referenced, and as per the forum KMG= Vyasa then RM indirectly also equals Vyasa.

NOW, RM and SMB compare Yudi to Sri Ram (YES, the 7th avatar of Narayan Namo Namah) so are we now saying Vyasa was wrong? Rishi Markand was wrong? SMB is wrong??
Basically then by this twisted warped logic, Gita is wrong, Hinduism in its entirety then is wrong.
ERM!! KUCH BHI!!!!

Arrghhh; I dunno whether to laugh or cry


That's something I have observed here.

Vyasa is relegated to the Background. Vyasa Who? It is the Chitra Bannerjees, the Iravate Karves etc who have the last word.

I have nothing against these authors or those who quote them.

But, to believe that their version is the perfect one just because it suits our 21st mentality is something I find reprehensible. No body is bothered to find out what the original author -Vyasa- has said in his epic.

I understand that many in this forum do not know Sanskrit and hence are not able to understand the beauty of the epic in its original language. As someone who reads the original versions, I have tried to bring out the hidden meanings, the subtle but clever usage of words- but very few seem interested. Rather Vyasa gets questioned, because it is difficult to understand the import of his words.


And this has become an amusing past time. To dissect - with half knowledge and misconceptions- and pass audacious judgments on the incidents without the humility to accept that somethings may be beyond our understanding.

Edited by varaali - 11 years ago
DrModel thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: Medha.S


🤣No salvation for us, If Yudhishtira is off to hell even after being away from anger almost all his life, always being compassionate towards his cousins even after they made him slave and stripped him off his possessions ( Seriously, he still could have the decency to have Duryodhna rescued even though Duryodhna and Karna had come to the forest just to laugh at his misery and despair🤢)
He was always so forgiving, kept forgiving and giving.
Never spoke against his elders, never said insulting words towards Dhrit, Bhishma, Drona etc. even after Dhritrashtra acted like a 🤬 towards them. ( Unlike some other great men who left no chance to insult them)

And so much more, but we people can't even claim to have done even this much.

Alas,I am to be a scorned spirit for the rest of eternity, not even good enough for hell.


There are SO many instances that RM mentions during vanvaas that talk of the innate goodness in Yudi.

From the moment they come out of the forest to HP, to wax house, to gatotkach's favorite uncle, to DPadi's wedding to all 5, to the kind of man India would want as its Samrat in IP, to even Rajsuya, to Arjun's exile, to dice game, especially in vanvaas.

Its unbelievable...and to say that because he in the innate goodness within himself could never have dreamed that he will lose his brothers and his wife and his wife will be publicly humiliated.

And THAT wife says THIS to Bheeshma about HER pati who stood helpless while she was so cruelly dragged in to the sabha

Draupadi cried, "How can you say Yudhishtira played willingly? In Indraprastha, he told Vidura he did not want to play. Obviously, he was provoked into playing. You were here all the while, Pitama: didn't you know how poor at dice my husband is? That he hasn't the temper for it, that he is too noble, too innocent. Or didn't you, perhaps, know there is no dice-player on earth like Shakuni? But you sat by without a murmur as Yudhishtira gambled away all that he owned. O, Pitama, you are the king's uncle; you wield great power in this sabha. How did you allow this? It was like sending a child into battle against a seasoned warrior. And yet, Bheeshma, you speak to me of the finer points of dharma. How do you dare?"

Menon, Ramesh (2006-07-20). THE MAHABHARATA: A Modern Rendering, Vol 1 (Kindle Locations 8368-8373). iUniverse. Kindle Edition.

+++++++++++++++++

AND THENNN, in the sammeee Mahabharat Sri Krishna says THIS

Krishna had not raised his voice. He spoke almost sadly, or at least, only with anger born of grief. "You dare tell me you have caused the Pandavas no suffering, that you are not to blame at all for what they endured these thirteen years. You dare. And in this sabha of wise men, who know you since your infancy, who know every sin you have ever committed. Well, let them decide whether any guilt attaches to you or not. I knew how fiercely you would argue today, Duryodhana, how glibly. That is why I came here and not because I had any real hope of convincing you to return to dharma. I am sure all these wise men have heard your clever arguments often enough. Now let them hear another point of view and decide which one is true. You were consumed by envy when Yudhishtira performed the Rajasuya yagna. Already, you had tried to kill your cousins more than once, because you hated them from the moment they came home out of the wilds. When you saw the wealth of Indraprastha and the splendor of the Mayaa sabha, you could not bear your envy any longer. I am not sure whether it was you or your uncle Shakuni who decided to conquer the Pandavas at a game of dice. Probably Shakuni thought of it; it sounds like what he would prefer, a battle he could not lose. You would have gone to war if the choice were yours, that is more your nature.

Menon, Ramesh (2006-07-20). THE MAHABHARATA: A Modern Rendering, Vol 2 (Kindle Locations 1697-1707). iUniverse. Kindle Edition.

Even if the plan was Shakuni's at first, you embraced it readily enough. You did not protest that it was a perfidious way to quench your envy of the sons of Pandu: to humiliate them, to destroy them if you could. The plan worked well. Yudhishtira accepted your challenge, poor, high-minded king. Exactly as you had calculated, he lost his reason at this game that did not suit him at all. Don't tell me, Duryodhana, that you believed Yudhishtira stood a chance of winning at dice against Shakuni. Don't tell me the game was played in friendly spirit with no harm intended. You could have stopped the game, any time you chose; but it was not to stop that you had begun. You did not stop until Yudhishtira had lost everything and his very honor, that day. And you say you are guilty of no crime? Do you take everyone in this sabha for a fool? As if the game of dice was not enough, you had your brother haul Panchali into this court. He dragged her in by her hair and all these great men heard what you said to her then, your cousins' wife, how you called her to sit in your lap. And then, your brother, this grinning Dusasana, tried to strip that queen naked in this hallowed sabha." Krishna's voice was almost a whisper now, what he said was reverberant. "And you tell me no blame attaches to you and you are an innocent man? Well, I have come here to learn how such a paragon of

Menon, Ramesh (2006-07-20). THE MAHABHARATA: A Modern Rendering, Vol 2 (Kindle Locations 1707-1717). iUniverse. Kindle Edition.

please take note of part in bold

dharma like you, Duryodhana, chooses to fight a war in which millions shall die, brutally, when Yudhishtira still offers you peace." Krishna's eyes blazed again, "You are no innocent, Duryodhana. You are the most evil man that draws breath in this world. Why do you try to deceive us, or is it yourself you need to deceive? Or do your sins weigh on you so heavily that you no longer know what dharma is? That you no longer see right from wrong, good from evil, darkness from light?"

Menon, Ramesh (2006-07-20). THE MAHABHARATA: A Modern Rendering, Vol 2 (Kindle Locations 1717-1721). iUniverse. Kindle Edition.

but what do I know, I am just a believer of "fictional" texts which paints heroes in such BAD light. And as for citations while stating POV re the MAHABHARAT, referencing from texts in inevitable.

I can reference from SMB as well, but why waste my time, it will be like banging my head against a wall.

Disclaimer: my views are based on my reading of sacred texts of MY religion and are MY opinion which as per rules in this forum I have a right over.
Edited by DrModel - 11 years ago
virmanxyz thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#40
i have t same qstn,i was puzzled wat is darm adharm bcz i see only adharm in mahabharat and t way women are being treatd in it

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".