@All - I agree with you. The two most irritating characterizations of Starbharat have been Karna and Draupadi.
Good thing StarYudi doesn't care for StarDrau's tantrums, and coolly tells her what needs to be done next, rather than trying to "pacify" her...seriously, what was Bhim trying to do?? It was looking so funny...😆
And as per the CVs, the Pandavas are "completely flawless" human beings, who can do absolutely NO wrong. I mean, even on the one occasion when the Pandavas could've been shown to be "flawed" (Drau's vibhaajan), even there, they got the clean chit.
StarArjuna introduces StarDrau as "daan" to StarKunti, and later explains that by "daan", he actually meant "kanyadaan". So, as per CVs, the StarPandavas did NOT "objectify" StarDrau in any way. And even when StarYudi was trying to tell StarKunti that they had actually brought a girl, StarKunti issues her order for the "vibhaajan". Therefore, ALL the blame for Drau's vibhaajan lies with StarKunti...oh well, at least StarKunti possessed ONE flaw, much better than her sickly sweet saintly characterization.
And then the fictional rajyasabhaa apmaan. StarPandavas (being "completely flawless" as per CVs) prove themselves to be best aaryas in the world...Hello CVs, dice game and vastraharan???
Or maybe, even during the dice game and vastraharan, the Pandavas could STILL get the clean chit. How? CVs could show Harry Potter-MB crossover during the dice game/vastraharan - StarShakuni putting StarYudi under the Imperious curse so that Yudi completely loses track of his senses and stakes everything.
As it is, this week, StarShakuni will prove that he is an ancestor of Severus Snape by pouring a "green liquid" in the havan, and invoking Takshak to turn into a cow thief, so as to obstruct the Indraprastha nagar poojan...