Feedback to CVs thread- Story distortion#2 - Page 12

Originally posted by: shani88

@All - I agree with you. The two most irritating characterizations of Starbharat have been Karna and Draupadi.

Good thing StarYudi doesn't care for StarDrau's tantrums, and coolly tells her what needs to be done next, rather than trying to "pacify" her...seriously, what was Bhim trying to do?? It was looking so funny...😆

And as per the CVs, the Pandavas are "completely flawless" human beings, who can do absolutely NO wrong. I mean, even on the one occasion when the Pandavas could've been shown to be "flawed" (Drau's vibhaajan), even there, they got the clean chit.

StarArjuna introduces StarDrau as "daan" to StarKunti, and later explains that by "daan", he actually meant "kanyadaan". So, as per CVs, the StarPandavas did NOT "objectify" StarDrau in any way. And even when StarYudi was trying to tell StarKunti that they had actually brought a girl, StarKunti issues her order for the "vibhaajan". Therefore, ALL the blame for Drau's vibhaajan lies with StarKunti...oh well, at least StarKunti possessed ONE flaw, much better than her sickly sweet saintly characterization.

And then the fictional rajyasabhaa apmaan. StarPandavas (being "completely flawless" as per CVs) prove themselves to be best aaryas in the world...Hello CVs, dice game and vastraharan???

Or maybe, even during the dice game and vastraharan, the Pandavas could STILL get the clean chit. How? CVs could show Harry Potter-MB crossover during the dice game/vastraharan - StarShakuni putting StarYudi under the Imperious curse so that Yudi completely loses track of his senses and stakes everything.

As it is, this week, StarShakuni will prove that he is an ancestor of Severus Snape by pouring a "green liquid" in the havan, and invoking Takshak to turn into a cow thief, so as to obstruct the Indraprastha nagar poojan...

Originally posted by: shyam09

wait so does this mean that all the snakes are dead? Or did they leave the moment Takshak disappeared?

lol that was such a funny scene. Bhim tries to calm Draupadi down and it fails ... and then Yuddhi has enough of that nonsense and was like "Shut up and listen to the truth before giving us another crappy bhasaan ... god you have a talking problem like your annoying frickin' dad!!"

Originally posted by: ParomaSurya

-@shyam (And then the fictional rajyasabhaa apmaan. StarPandavas (being "completely flawless" as per CVs) prove themselves to be best aaryas in the world...Hello CVs, dice game and vastraharan??? )




Maybe they are trying to show that even though they are flawless all their lives they go through so much crap!!! The ONE time they slip up, people just couldn't let it go...where duryodhan did one adharm after another ... And not only was he never punished but no one even protested him.

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Actually, after reading the perspectives thread about the other version, I am coming around to this serial. I think they're taking bits & pieces from everywhere - from Indonesian versions, they took Vrushali's name from Mrityunjaya, they'll take something from Yagnaseni, something else from Palace of Illusions and so on. So we'll get a blended Mahabharata.

Yeah, it's a legit question of whether such a khichri is preferable to Vyasa, but Vyasa too has a lot of internal contradictions which, if examined closely, throw doubts on it. And if one looks @ differences b/w Vyasa's different works such as Mahabharata vs Shrimad Bhagvatam, contradictions are even more glaring. Such as what did Kunti do after the Pandavas won the war?

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Actually, after reading the perspectives thread about the other version, I am coming around to this serial. I think they're taking bits & pieces from everywhere - from Indonesian versions, they took Vrushali's name from Mrityunjaya, they'll take something from Yagnaseni, something else from Palace of Illusions and so on. So we'll get a blended Mahabharata.

Yeah, it's a legit question of whether such a khichri is preferable to Vyasa, but Vyasa too has a lot of internal contradictions which, if examined closely, throw doubts on it. And if one looks @ differences b/w Vyasa's different works such as Mahabharata vs Shrimad Bhagvatam, contradictions are even more glaring. Such as what did Kunti do after the Pandavas won the war?

Originally posted by: ParomaSurya

Maybe they are trying to show that even though they are flawless all their lives they go through so much crap!!! The ONE time they slip up, people just couldn't let it go...where duryodhan did one adharm after another ... And not only was he never punished but no one even protested him.

Originally posted by: Medha.S

took the Arjuna-Karna bromance from.🥳

It is Indo MB too, the day before Karna joins the war, they have a secret emotional meeting.

Hugs were given too.

Originally posted by: shyam09

actually, that sounds pretty logical ... and now that I think about every event where Dury does adharm towards Pandavas ... nothing happens...

Case in point: Duryodhana insulting Pandu and Kunti during the Rangbhoomi. Mr. Dhriti didn't seem to give a crap about younger dead bro Pandu back then, whereas nowadays he is keeping Kunti hostage. 😆

Originally posted by: shani88

Isn't that COMPLETELY contrasting to what Vyas' MB states?

In other words, in the Indo MB, were Karna and the Pandavas buddies, and Karna had no role to play in Drau's humiliation???

Then in the Indo MB, whose side did Karna fight on in Kurukshetra??? And who killed him?? Did Karna have any role to play in Abhimanyu's death?