a fact that you wish to change in Mahabharata - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

59

Views

11.5k

Users

41

Likes

166

Frequent Posters

Shakti_Shiva thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#21
do show makers count ?? 😃
If not, I would like to change Vyaasa himself. He had a choice to turn down niyogi. He went with it.. had he not ?? kuru dynasty would have ended. many many lives would have been saved..
Edited by Shakti_Shiva - 11 years ago
varaali thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#22
The gandharva who killed Cjitrangada. If only Chitrangada had lived long enough to marry and establish a dynasty...
But yes... Satyavati's father is the bigger culprit.
Edited by varaali - 11 years ago
divyasn thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#23
Draupadi's insult .. if it was not there , the whole Kurukshethra war wouldnt have been there ..

So abhimanyu wud be alive ..
Arijit007 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#24
hmmm, if someone killed shakuni before gandhari's mariege, i think some of the events can be changed.
chirpy_life19 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#25

All this Mahabharat is coz of Shantanu who lacked self control.
Edited by Cool-n-Fresh - 11 years ago
bobbiswas thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#26
Bheeshma's rubbish pratigya ... which is actually the reason behind the entire Mahabharata ...
How?
When he found that his father is in love at that old age with an ambitious power loving girl, instead of supporting him and sacrificing the entire kingdom's such samridhyi and happiness just to give ****** pleasure to his father, he should have unmasked Satyabati's true picture that she is a power loving greedy woman and at that age King Shantanu should concentrate on puja/ path ...
Bheeshma was a good looking good skilled guy (Like Arjuna) ... so he would have been a great king and father of great son's going ahead and no scene of Vyaas's son blind Dhritarashtra ... so no Duryodhan. Only confirmed character were Karna and Shakuni, as they had no link with Bheeshma for birth. Maybe going ahead Bheeshma would have killed Shakuni in war and acquired Gandhar ... Dono what would have happened to Karna though ...
No Bheeshma pratigya, no Satyabati, no Amba case, no Dhritarashtra/ Pandu ... No Duryodhan/ Dush-shashana ...
Karna was confirmed and maybe rest of 'pandu putra' as well, bcoz that depends on Kunti's decision .. but whether they had link with Hastinapur and Kurukhetra ... most likely no.
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#27
Satyavati was not a power loving woman.. And they were not in love. Shantanu approached her foster father who demanded and those demands will be for anyone who wants to marry Satyavati, not just Shantanu... Also her father did not force Shantanu to accept and marry her..
It was Shantanu who could not come over his lust and was trembling in between.. which was picked up by Devavrata.. The one who is the reason is Shantanu however his status was absolutely human and can not be blamed..
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#28
No relationship between gandhar and hastinapur,please.
😆
no maamujaan shakuni in hastinapur and everyone could live happily ever after.
rasyafan thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#29
There are so many turning points in Mahabharat that we all wish "kash aisa na hua hota, kash aisa huya hota, kash he did this instead of that" ...and so on and so forth

But if I could then I would stop the very second when Mahabharat was conceived at ganga's tat (shore ) by none other then both Ganga and Shantanu. When Shantanu stopped Ganga from drowing their 8th son Bheeshm.

Oh, I so wish that "kash Shantanu ne Ganga ko roka na hota aur Bheeshm ko baha diya hota to shayad, Bheeshm na hote, pratigya lene ke liye and whatever followed would never have occured"

but this was not to be.

Several, reasons were there for the conception of Mahabharat, not just one Curse to Vasu dev by Vasishth for stealing his cow. Draupadi was cursed by her husband, and before that 5 wives of devtas including parwati ji were cursed, Vishnuji was cursed, Dhritrashtra was cursed, Abhimany was cursed, or when dwarpals of vishnu ji Jay and Vijay were supposed to be killed by Vishnu ji first as Hrinyakashyap Prahlad's father in Satyug then as rawan in Treta yug in Ramayan then as shishupal in Dwapar yug in mahabharat and the other brother as Kans.

There are several other factors which were supposed to take place only during Mahabharat. Everything was linked to each other which lead to Mahabharat or rather which was due to happen during Mahabharat.

So it is really futile to think "kash aisa na hua hota kash aisa hua hota".

It is really difficult to pin point at one particular incident when was Mahabharat exactly concieved or conceptualized.

Perhaps, Mahabharat was deliberately pre planned by Adi Shakti the parameshwari the Maha Maya goddess. God alone knows I mean adi shakti can only answer this. 😆 😆 I doubt if even Ved Vyasji knows this 😉

Happy Lohri and Happy Makarskranti and Happy Onam friends🤗

Have a love time 🤗 🥳
Edited by rasyafan - 11 years ago
Rishi_ thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#30
wish to change bhisma's vow and satyavati's marriage to shantanu.

wish bhishma never took that vow. then he would become king and mahabharat would never happen at all😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".