Originally posted by: canuck-umz
Which is exactly why Aanchal was so terrible in court on Friday 😆. She isn't a prosecuting lawyer specifically, she isn't cut out for such criminal cases (murder, etc.).
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 24 Aug 2025 - Season Premier
First glimpse of Dua Padukone! Pics and video inside
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 25 Aug 2025 EDT
CID episode 71 - 23rd August
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 24 Aug 2025 EDT
ARMAN KI JOGAN 24.8
ANSHUMAN GONE 25.8
Restrain order
Navri’s Love
No hype this year
Deepika vs Katrina wars…World War 3 👀
Yeh Rishta kya Kehlata hai
Agastya's Ikkis to clash with Junaid's Ek din(Nov 7,2025)
Danger Song Copied From Pak Show
A Study on Miss Abhira "Jogan" Sharma
Parineeti Chopra is pregnant
Anupamaa 25 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Why I'm least interested in watching CID Season 2 Upcoming Episodes?
Who Brings a Song to Life: The Singer’s Voice or Actors’ Expressions?
18 years of Heyy Babyy
Originally posted by: canuck-umz
Which is exactly why Aanchal was so terrible in court on Friday 😆. She isn't a prosecuting lawyer specifically, she isn't cut out for such criminal cases (murder, etc.).
Originally posted by: parthianglory.
Aanchal was downright embarrassing in court. I couldn't bear to watch her. After all that bravado, and that very unsubtly interjected commentary about her being so academically talented - she was humiliated in court.I wish there was more of a build-up. Writers should have shown her excelling in at least a couple of other cases before she was defeated in court by a person who isn't even a lawyer. The last episode has left the resounding impression of Aanchal as an incompetent lawyer who is all bark and no bite.
Originally posted by: Ash.raje17
Well I have a doubt that is slightly different than the ones raised here. Did the Raichands actually hire a lawyer Ranvir or were they banking on Kabir to save the day? Because in the episode only Anchal was seen speaking. No-one defended Ranvir.
Another thing. How can a civilian come and state facts in the court. Isn't that contempt of court? If the evidence was to be presented, then it should have been presented by the Raichand's lawyer and not Kabir. Or am I wrong?