Both need space ❤️❤️❤️ - Page 4

Originally posted by: msin

Yes the way they talk to each other .. always gives out they shared a past relationship and are exes .. So Sai is not wrong in saying He’s sailing on both boats .. Also pakhi cannot hide her feelings or love for you .. and so it’s uncomfortable for Sai to move on and embrace Virat .. the logical way out .. Is Sai n virat shift to a different home .. visit the family on festivals ..like devi n pulkit ..

I feel pakhi is betrayed because she’s stuck in a mess .. what is her life .. she’s making tea and keeping Bk in good humour .. and the object of her affection is busy cavorting with somebody else .. when she had married samrat .. she had wanted to have virat at arms length..

Do you remember how much she used to call virat in GC .. telling him to come back to Nagpur .. because she needs him .. she wanted him at her beck n call .. virat shrugging her off like yesterday’s news is a big insult to her .. and she won’t let him rest easy .. Hell hath no fury than a woman scorned

Pakhi's mess is her own making .....no doubt. It's just that Virat has indulged her too much emotionally ...and so she feels she has the right to question him at his indifference.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

I'm glad we are discussing it. I'm always very uncomfortable with Virakhi relationship. I'm hesitant to call it an emotional affair.....so I don't put any label on it. Saying they had an "emotional relationship" is probably apt.

To think, he gave a commitment of being faithful to Pakhi - his brother's wife. That itself is so inappropriate. On top of that, the way he behaved with her during the initial days - it was a continuation of that emotional commitment......Virakhi conversation during SamrAkhi suhaag raat was just 🤢 ....Boy, Samrat doesn't know of Virat's vaada yet. If he did, he'd probably punch Virat. (I feel like I still see a remnant of that emotional relationship now...in the liberties they take with each other even in anger...please don't throw chappals at me)

@asmi You hit the nail on the head! Yes, he did indeed move on from Pakhi without letting her know that he has moved on! This guy has acted insensitively with both Pakhi and Sai.

I had pointed out something in my discussion with @laksh once. Why does Pakhi feel sooo betrayed, why does she feel entitled to call out his betrayal openly.....it just cannot be that lousy vaada. It was his subsequent continuation of their emotional relationship and also his failure in clearly stating that he has moved on that makes Pakhi have a right to question him. I'm not defending Pakhi, she is crazy. But the original author was certainly trying to convey something through Pakhi's character.

Thanks for the tag, Nethraa. We have discussed this before I think, and I am still hesitant in calling this an emotional relationship. I tend to agree with many of the points that @404 has mentioned on a prior page in this thread too. I need more time to formulate my thoughts and will respond later 😊

Sure!

I know we have discussed this many times. It's just that every time, I keep having more doubts! And I'm quite astounded by Virat's lack of maturity in this....I'm not saying he is doing anything out of malintentions....he just comes across as extremely immature....I cannot connect with his mindset at all.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

Sure!

I know we have discussed this many times. It's just that every time, I keep having more doubts! And I'm quite astounded by Virat's lack of maturity in this....I'm not saying he is doing anything out of malintentions....he just comes across as extremely immature....I cannot connect with his mindset at all.

One thing is for sure... I don't sympathize with Pakhi at all nor do I find that Virat has wronged her in any way. This is entirely her own doing. She chose to marry Samrat. No one forced her to go through with the shaadi. It was her disgusting mind that wanted to get into CN as one brother's wife and the other one's mistress. EMA has been her goal this entire time in my opinion. Virat has always known his boundaries with her, and never has he crossed the line. He has made it clear to her from the beginning that he is her friend and nothing else. He has rejected every attempt she has made to come close to him. Sure, he did not verbally tell her that she means nothing to him until the KBA dialogue, but shouldn't his actions have made it clear to her... or the very fact that he is a married man???? She kept trying over and over again...in fact she still is 🤢

Interesting conversation.

I have to read through fully. But I feel everywhere we are only talking about Virat and Sai. Even on Twitter, Virat fans are upset because of Sai and Sai fans fight back because of other incidents.

Why is there no charcha on Pakhi in a serious manner? We make memes on her, etc.

It is Pakhi who has been absolutely adamant about not giving up her rights over Virat.

It is because of her call on her suhaag raat that Samrat misunderstood.

It is Pakhi who claimed that they wanted to get married and Sai heard that.

That's why I hope to God, they bring out Pakhi's misdemeanors and their so called friendship is called out by Samrat.

It is easy to pounce on Sai because she has a brash tongue. But Samrat a cheerful, happy person has become this bitter, cynical person because of Pakhi. He didn't deserve it.

Originally posted by: scarlett22

Interesting conversation.

I have to read through fully. But I feel everywhere we are only talking about Virat and Sai. Even on Twitter, Virat fans are upset because of Sai and Sai fans fight back because of other incidents.

Why is there no charcha on Pakhi in a serious manner? We make memes on her, etc.

It is Pakhi who has been absolutely adamant about not giving up her rights over Virat.

It is because of her call on her suhaag raat that Samrat misunderstood.

It is Pakhi who claimed that they wanted to get married and Sai heard that.

That's why I hope to God, they bring out Pakhi's misdemeanors and their so called friendship is called out by Samrat.

It is easy to pounce on Sai because she has a brash tongue. But Samrat a cheerful, happy person has become this bitter, cynical person because of Pakhi. He didn't deserve it.

yaar my biggest fear is that the makers will find a way to whitewash her yet again.... she truly cannot get away with it this time...

waise why did kaku and some of the others look shocked at samrat's return today?? I found their expressions quite odd..

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

I'm glad we are discussing it. I'm always very uncomfortable with Virakhi relationship. I'm hesitant to call it an emotional affair.....so I don't put any label on it. Saying they had an "emotional relationship" is probably apt.

To think, he gave a commitment of being faithful to Pakhi - his brother's wife. That itself is so inappropriate. On top of that, the way he behaved with her during the initial days - it was a continuation of that emotional commitment......Virakhi conversation during SamrAkhi suhaag raat was just 🤢 ....Boy, Samrat doesn't know of Virat's vaada yet. If he did, he'd probably punch Virat. (I feel like I still see a remnant of that emotional relationship now...in the liberties they take with each other even in anger...please don't throw chappals at me)

@asmi You hit the nail on the head! Yes, he did indeed move on from Pakhi without letting her know that he has moved on! This guy has acted insensitively with both Pakhi and Sai.

I had pointed out something in my discussion with @laksh once. Why does Pakhi feel sooo betrayed, why does she feel entitled to call out his betrayal openly.....it just cannot be that lousy vaada. It was his subsequent continuation of their emotional relationship and also his failure in clearly stating that he has moved on that makes Pakhi have a right to question him. I'm not defending Pakhi, she is crazy. But the original author was certainly trying to convey something through Pakhi's character.

Nethraa personally I was never comfortable with how they talked even before Sai entered his life in the beginning, just after the marriage on his SR.. I just let it go because people here on the forum made me believe that he was just being a friend to her..But honestly I never got convinced. They were certainly having an emotional relationship and he did let Pakhi know the dynamic of his relationship with Sai in order to keep that intact. Some say, he let her know about the deal as a friend, to me it looked more like he is trying to clear his stance to her.. Also him allowing Pakhi to constantly interfere in their matters, with him also going on to explain the details of the SR was simply not needed. He let her in late night infront of his wife to have a chit chat which was again inconsiderate if not insensitive. Yet again the whole phone convo during Ladakh trip or even the packing conversation was something that has made Sai the woman she is today.. Its not just his words of rejection in the beginning of the relationship, it was how he and Pakhi made her feel in the beginning , is what has bottled up to and extent that she is here standing all insecure and blurting out things.. For Pakhi he let her know too late verbally after having moved on.. He assumed since he has moved on, she too will.. The first time he lets her know in direct words were when the handholding scenes happens and he in disgust tells what Sai thinks about them and ultimately he sees hope in Pakhi's eyes and denies it.. In all this was not Sai right...he called it bakwaas , but she was right and did he go to tell her , Oh Sai you were right there and I have clarified things...Virat certainly is a person who thinks, if he has conveyed things , it would have been conveyed as clearly as he assumed.. and tends to ignore the reactions..

Originally posted by: tptwi

One thing is for sure... I don't sympathize with Pakhi at all nor do I find that Virat has wronged her in any way. This is entirely her own doing. She chose to marry Samrat. No one forced her to go through with the shaadi. It was her disgusting mind that wanted to get into CN as one brother's wife and the other one's mistress. EMA has been her goal this entire time in my opinion. Virat has always known his boundaries with her, and never has he crossed the line. He has made it clear to her from the beginning that he is her friend and nothing else. He has rejected every attempt she has made to come close to him. Sure, he did not verbally tell her that she means nothing to him until the KBA dialogue, but shouldn't his actions have made it clear to her... or the very fact that he is a married man???? She kept trying over and over again...in fact she still is 🤢

Oh even I have zero sympathy for Pakhi. Whatever mess she is in, whatever decisions she took or her actions - she is 100% responsible. Virat has got nothing to do with it.

I will try to explain what I'm trying to convey through an analogy (don't know it is going to make sense):-

Suppose I don't bother to lock my door before leaving......someone may just peep in and leave, someone may take Rs. 10 on the table or a decoit will ransack the entire house. The people involved are 100% responsible for committing the crime.....but it doesn't change the fact that I acted extremely irresponsible and stupid.

I may/may not be making sense here.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

Oh even I have zero sympathy for Pakhi. Whatever mess she is in, whatever decisions she took or her actions - she is 100% responsible. Virat has got nothing to do with it.

I will try to explain what I'm trying to convey through an analogy (don't know it is going to make sense):-

Suppose I don't bother to lock my door before leaving......someone may just peep in and leave, someone may take Rs. 10 on the table or a decoit will ransack the entire house. The people involved are 100% responsible for committing the crime.....but it doesn't change the fact that I acted extremely irresponsible and stupid.

I may/may not be making sense here.

Your analogy makes SO MUCH sense Nethraa....it is actually quite perfect ⭐️

And you have said what I was trying to find the words to say.... Virat has made many mistakes, but his intentions have always been pure...which is why I am hesitant to call this an emotional relationship because to me that sort of implies intentionality on his part....

Originally posted by: tptwi

One thing is for sure... I don't sympathize with Pakhi at all nor do I find that Virat has wronged her in any way. This is entirely her own doing. She chose to marry Samrat. No one forced her to go through with the shaadi. It was her disgusting mind that wanted to get into CN as one brother's wife and the other one's mistress. EMA has been her goal this entire time in my opinion. Virat has always known his boundaries with her, and never has he crossed the line. He has made it clear to her from the beginning that he is her friend and nothing else. He has rejected every attempt she has made to come close to him. Sure, he did not verbally tell her that she means nothing to him until the KBA dialogue, but shouldn't his actions have made it clear to her... or the very fact that he is a married man???? She kept trying over and over again...in fact she still is 🤢

Even during the Vaada , he was clear that he will respect their deal provided she accepts Samrat wholeheartedly. Sometimes I am confused if Virat broke the Vaada or Pakhi . Pakhi never accepted Samrat so her expectation that Virat will fulfill his side of commitment shows her selfishness. At one point , I felt that Virat should have spoken to Pakhi clearly that Vaada no longer exists and he is breaking it . I believe she at-least deserves this from Virat .