Star Plus ne aukaat dikhayi WTH end

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

#61

@HippoSucks

You dislike blaming everyone. So? You expect others to think same?

You keep your opinion and let others keep theirs.

Regarding Rajnath, I think you forgot the episodes when Sakshi was asking to stop betting on women and Rajnath was instead lecturing her to let Shaurya be! He even sent Raima to convince Sakshi to let Shaurya complete his bet! He laughed with Shaurya over betting. So how can you say Sakshi aided Shaurya's crime more than him?

He went with Shaurya to bribe lawyer and make him lose case. He killed lawyer later and took tape from him.

And rape happened due to bet started by Karan. Sakshi didn't ask Shaurya to rape. Infact the murders Shaurya did were also planned alone or with friends. So how can you say Sakshi aided his crime? Cover up was done by Rajnath too. He handled even CBI for Shaurya!

Sakshi always scolded Shaurya's friends and asked him to keep away from them. She scolded his friends too. The Friends who led to crimes and bets.

Whereas Rajnath didn't bother and asked Sakshi to not nag much.

Shaurya himself, his friends and BOTH parents are to blame for what he is. Not just Sakshi alone.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

#62

HippoSucks

If my being a law student is irrelevant then so was your being a physicist!

I am not the only one posting here. Many others also posted and I just replied to them.

That's it.

I am not hyperbolising the end.

Hyperbole is to give 5 stars and call show flawless, best in history, landmark etc.

Stating anything on this show is useless. It is done. Over and out.

You can ask me to shut up. How will shut others up who didn't like the end?

You can't force your opinion on others.

BTW it would be better to post in farewell thread than here. You can glorify the show there as much as you like.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

#63

Originally posted by: Perfect100
@atominis I will repeat the line of deby.bh
Ooo writer tu pyaar bhare nagme likh mere bhai.. 😆

True!🤪

Quote

HippoSucks

@HippoSucks

Voyager

Posted: 10 years ago

#64

Originally posted by: atominis
@HippoSucks
You dislike blaming everyone. So? You expect others to think same?

You keep your opinion and let others keep theirs.

Regarding Rajnath, I think you forgot the episodes when Sakshi was asking to stop betting on women and Rajnath was instead lecturing her to let Shaurya be! He even sent Raima to convince Sakshi to let Shaurya complete his bet! He laughed with Shaurya over betting. So how can you say Sakshi aided Shaurya's crime more than him?

He went with Shaurya to bribe lawyer and make him lose case. He killed lawyer later and took tape from him.

And rape happened due to bet started by Karan. Sakshi didn't ask Shaurya to rape. Infact the murders Shaurya did were also planned alone or with friends. So how can you say Sakshi aided his crime? Cover up was done by Rajnath too. He handled even CBI for Shaurya!

Sakshi always scolded Shaurya's friends and asked him to keep away from them. She scolded his friends too. The Friends who led to crimes and bets.

Whereas Rajnath didn't bother and asked Sakshi to not nag much.

Shaurya himself, his friends and BOTH parents are to blame for what he is. Not just Sakshi alone.

Not needlessly blaming everyone isn't an opinion, but it is the way it should be. If I'm walking on a street and someone behind me gets robbed, should I be blamed? No. Should that depend on the opinion of whoever is judging the incident? No.

Even if it were based on opinions, if everyone accepted opinions to be the ultimate truth, then there would be no point in discussions.

I have an eidetic memory, and it is unlikely that I would forget such episodes. However, are you arguing that not reprimanding womanizing is worse than not admonishing murder? Note that is just one incident, and numerous more have occurred throughout their lives (such as the principal). Also, Sakshi has encouraged Shaurya's womanizing habits as well (although not with Durga). The only reason Sakshi stopped Shaurya's bet on Durga (or at least attempted to) was because she was afraid that Durga would harm Shaurya, not because of her morals.

Sakshi and Rajnath were both to blame for what happened, but Sakshi is definitely more to blame for it.

Also, you are blaming the development team for a 1 minute sequence of Shaurya blaming Sakshi. Don't you think you are being a little too harsh on them for such a small thing?

Quote

HippoSucks

@HippoSucks

Voyager

Posted: 10 years ago

#65

Originally posted by: atominis
HippoSucks
If my being a law student is irrelevant then so was your being a physicist!

I am not the only one posting here. Many others also posted and I just replied to them.

That's it.

I am not hyperbolising the end.

Hyperbole is to give 5 stars and call show flawless, best in history, landmark etc.

Stating anything on this show is useless. It is done. Over and out.

You can ask me to shut up. How will shut others up who didn't like the end?

You can't force your opinion on others.

BTW it would be better to post in farewell thread than here. You can glorify the show there as much as you like.

Myself being a mathematical physicist was not at all irrelevant, because we are stereotypically portrayed as being fairly logical people. Therefore, you would assume I have the capabilities to pick out even small logical faults in the show. However, I was unable to find too many, and most were so small that they were not even worth identifying. Please read my sentences in context to understand the relevance of what I say.

Also, just because I quoted your post doesn't mean I am talking to only you. What I say is directed to everyone with an opinion similar to your's, and what you say is directed to everyone with an opinion similar to mine (although I'm sure I'm in the minority here).

It is definitely not hyperbolic to call this show the best right now. But that is something based on opinion. You have to look at such things relatively. This show is much better than numerous other shows containing much more illogicalities, having a worse plot etc.

Discussions being stopped merely because the show ended is a terrible reason. The only real reason for them stopping is if this forums was to be archived.

If you take level-headed discussions to be equivalent to thrusting opinions on others, then so be it.

I have no intention of glorifying the show because it has a certain reputation in everyone's minds. However, the facts upon which that opinion is based are arguable.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

#66

Rajnath was the one who encouraged Shaurya to womanise. If you recall Sakshi had scolded him after Avantika fiasco. I am not just talking about Durga. Sakshi wanted him to stop this. Reminded him of how he gets in trouble with his ways.

Rajnath had laughed over this and asked Shaurya to carry on but in a way that it didn't affect his lifestyle. Rewatch if you want.

There are many reasons to criticise the ending and not just this blame on Sakshi. I outlined all of them and I am not going to repeat them.

I am not being harsh on the team. Are you from the team that you are taking it to heart? 😲

To the team I gave farewell cards and threads only despite them letting us down.

Call out on me if I wrote something directly to team to criticise them!

Here on a general forum I can write anything I want. I have the right to do so.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

#67

HippoSucks

Your post is ironical.

You talk of logic yet have problem if anyone discusses logical inconsistencies in this show which was trashy even by soap standards.

You want me or others to do what? Do aarti of the team and hail them for making the greatest show ever?

You are not discussing. You are not answering the points we made. Instead you are just questioning us why we wrote what we did or calling us harsh, hyperbole and whatnot.

You are not even discussing the show. Only discussing members and telling how to react and how not to.

Quote

HippoSucks

@HippoSucks

Voyager

Posted: 10 years ago

#68

Originally posted by: atominis
Rajnath was the one who encouraged Shaurya to womanise. If you recall Sakshi had scolded him after Avantika fiasco. I am not just talking about Durga. Sakshi wanted him to stop this. Reminded him of how he gets in trouble with his ways.
Rajnath had laughed over this and asked Shaurya to carry on but in a way that it didn't affect his lifestyle. Rewatch if you want.

There are many reasons to criticise the ending and not just this blame on Sakshi. I outlined all of them and I am not going to repeat them.

I am not being harsh on the team. Are you from the team that you are taking it to heart? 😲

To the team I gave farewell cards and threads only despite them letting us down.

Call out on me if I wrote something directly to team to criticise them!

Here on a general forum I can write anything I want. I have the right to do so.

You answered your own question. The only reason Sakshi stopped Shaurya in all those incidents was because she didn't want Shaurya to get into trouble, not for care of the victims.

I just went through all your posts and found no post where you outlined why you are overemphasizing such a small thing. Mind quoting the post for me? Thanks in advance.

I'm not telling you what you should post. I don't see how you can get the implication from any of my posts either.

Quote

HippoSucks

@HippoSucks

Voyager

Posted: 10 years ago

#69

Originally posted by: atominis
HippoSucks
Your post is ironical.

You talk of logic yet have problem if anyone discusses logical inconsistencies in this show which was trashy even by soap standards.

You want me or others to do what? Do aarti of the team and hail them for making the greatest show ever?

You are not discussing. You are not answering the points we made. Instead you are just questioning us why we wrote what we did or calling us harsh, hyperbole and whatnot.

You are not even discussing the show. Only discussing members and telling how to react and how not to.

Please read the post you're responding to again. I said that despite me being a fairly logical person myself (although of course much less than the distinguished soon to be practicing lawyer here), I was unable to find many major logical faults in the show.

The rest of your post are far-fetched implications which my post in no way portrays. I've replied to each sentence of your posts, much less each point.