DID 1 and DID 2 ratings

😃 Great post.........Some people on the forum will just make up facts to prove an invalid point.........People were actually saying that DID 1 and DID 2 had ratings at this part of the show in the 5's and 6's........The facts you posted speak for themselves...........DID Doubles is doing as well as DID 1 and DID 2 did at this time even with 2 new shows to compete against..........😃 Once again it proves the point that some people just love to make things up........😃

PS --- To those who were saying how DID 1 and DID 2 averaged a 5 and 6 ratings at this stage of the show, please feel free to comment on the actual evidence 😛

Originally posted by: Prud123

Hi Ankit

Not sure why there are 51 views and only on comment.Any how atleast people know the truth now.Below is the complete detailed information

DID season 2

Week 1-3.9

Week 2-3.5

Week 3-4.5

Week 4-4.3

Week 5-3.7

Week 6-2.7

Week 7-2.7

Week 8-2.8

Week 9-2.6

Week10-2.7

Avg 3.34

DID Doubles

Week 1-3.6

Week 2-3.2

Week 3-2.68

Week 4-3.87

Average 3.33

Neck to neck so i must say well done DID Doubles.I hope that members finally accept that DID doubles is doing as well because DID is about great dancing and not the mentors.Below is the link to the site to check the ratings for any one who needs proof

http://www.indiantelevision.com/tvr/telemeter/teltamarchmon.php4?year=2010

Originally posted by: Rapier

neck to neck? the average of DID 2's first four weeks is 4.05. and the average of DID Doubles for the first four weeks is 3.33? neck to neck?

DID Doubles is going great. but as good as DID 2? u have the info right above u to see that.

Well you cant compare like that an average automatically becomes per week.What i should have actually done is taken out the average ratings(which means per week) for entire DID season 2 and compared it with average(per week) of DID doubles.But i didnt want to that as DID season 2 slipped a lot in ratings after the 5th week despite the great terrence and remo.Avg for DID season 2 would have come very low .And logically ratings for a show should increase as it progresses not decrease.Anyways dont want to get into mathematics of averages and comparisons.But as everyone can see DID doubles is doing as well but i guess some people cant accept the truth after even seeing the ratings.So i cant do much about it.I give up

Originally posted by: Prud123

Well you cant compare like that an average automatically becomes per week.What i should have actually done is taken out the average ratings(which means per week) for entire DID season 2 and compared it with average(per week) of DID doubles.But i didnt want to that as DID season 2 slipped a lot in ratings after the 5th week despite the great terrence and remo.Avg for DID season 2 would have come very low .And logically ratings for a show should increase as it progresses not decrease.Anyways dont want to get into mathematics of averages and comparisons.But as everyone can see DID doubles is doing as well but i guess some people cant accept the truth after even seeing the ratings.So i cant do much about it.I give up

Originally posted by: DharmeshSir

I remember those days when DID used to be just DID 😒 I don't believe people are comparing the seasons itself...

maybe DID Doubles rating is higher...but stop reasoning it happened because Terence and Remo are gone...Many people dislike Geeta and Mithunda...so u mean if her and Mithun both left the show, TRPs would skyrocket?

And vice versa...CDD and JDJ rating is low because they are not accomplished dance shows like DID yet. Not because Terence and Remo are judging.

Im not naming anyone specifically but this has been happening alot in here...

Originally posted by: DharmeshSir

I remember those days when DID used to be just DID 😒 I don't believe people are comparing the seasons itself...

maybe DID Doubles rating is higher...but stop reasoning it happened because Terence and Remo are gone...Many people dislike Geeta and Mithunda...so u mean if her and Mithun both left the show, TRPs would skyrocket?

And vice versa...CDD and JDJ rating is low because they are not accomplished dance shows like DID yet. Not because Terence and Remo are judging.

Im not naming anyone specifically but this has been happening alot in here...

Originally posted by: Rapier

but DID Doubles ratings are also slipping and ts been only 4 weeks.😕 at least DID increased its ratings in the first 4 weeks. and i wonder why u can't compare the 1st four weeks of DID 2 to first four weeks of DID Doubles. what happens afterward is not the point cuz we don't know what will happen afterward in DID Doubles.

and i will repeat myself once more. cuz u seem to misunderstand me. i NEVER said DID Doubles is doing bad and nor did i EVER say that DID 2 did well thanks to remo and terence. all i said was DID Doubles is not doing that well compared to DID 2. and u have the proof for that. u provided it.

Well sorry but i dont see how going from 2.68 to 3.87 is a slip in the trps.And why shpouldnt we talk about the fact that DId season 2 ratings slipped badly after 4 weeks the mentors were the same right.And i do understand the you never said that DID doubles is not doing well but you are saying that DID season 2 did better but if you analyze the data correctly you will know the that comparison needs to be averaged out because few weeks better performance does not mean general better performance.Like i said in my earlier post comparing the average ratings of all the DID season 2 weeks to DID double avg ratings each week will give us a more clearer picture