Deepika shows up at JNU to support students protesting against govt - Page 41

Created

Last reply

Replies

603

Views

27.9k

Users

100

Likes

1.1k

Frequent Posters

ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: KootyPai

I have not said there are no Hindu attackers. I'm asking if any Hindu criminal's name has been changed to Muslim..like here they changed Nadeem to Rajesh

They did not change Nadeem to Rajesh. They have created the character of an acid attacker based on various stories and made him Rajesh.

Sunflower234 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

I hope bhakton ne National statistical office ki report padh li hogi.

So much for New India 🤪

ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: flipfl0p


and where you feel convenient to answer.

Since you said this, didn't you conveniently ignore my reply where I rebutt your fake claim about minorities in Pakistan?

Also, no, your post doesn't address any concerns. Till the point I read it, it says any ID proof will suffice, but the Home Minister of the country is on record saying exactly the opposite. That they have to get decades old documents.

Edited by ponymo - 5 years ago
ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago

Again you're sharing RW propaganda without any research. You're incorrigible.

The Home Minister of the country is on record when he said these IDs won't suffice.

But okay, I guess you believe some charlatan dhongi baba over anyone (btw, this fake baba Jaggi has not even read the Act - and is speaking out of his ass).

Sunflower234 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: ponymo

Yes, because I can engage with any post I wish to. And I am not obligated to reply to every post in this thread - I thought this understanding was pretty universal? What is not clear about it?

I have stated it again and again. But let me say it again in simple terms - CAA provides citizenship to a few selective communities, and is not inclusive like the Indian Constitution is.

This is just one problematic aspect.

The next one is NRC. People have to prove their citizenship with documents - including poor people, who struggle to get one square meal a day - And documents like Aadhar card, etc. will not be accepted. They will have to get decades old certificates proving their citizenship. Now these poor people, who do not have a shelter, or their documents may have been lost in a flood or a natural calamity, where would they go? As per NRC they would not be considered citizens of the country. But only if you are a Muslim you would have a problem, because when seen in context of CAA, you will be given citizenship if you are Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Christian, etc. So only Muslims are in trouble. It only serves the evil purpose of the BJP and the RW.

And this is exactly why this needs to be fought, because it undermines India's social fabric and the core values its constitution stands for.

If even you are Hindu, Sikh,Jain etc and you don't have documents, you will be provided citizenship by naturalisation.

Is this really hard for bhakts to understand this??

This NRC is not just anti muslim, it is anti poor also.

~*sindhu*~ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

The lengths IT cell will go to demonise people when they oppose their masters. But then communal card the only card they know to polarise people.


https://twitter.com/AbhinandanSekhr/status/1214876364160913409

807116 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~

The lengths IT cell will go to demonise people when they oppose their masters. But then communal card the only card they know to polarise people.


https://twitter.com/AbhinandanSekhr/status/1214876364160913409


If so, I would defenitely apologise. I don't trust opindia completely. But I read it along with NDTV news to get counter narrative, so that I can balance my views. But I trust Swaraj. They usually don't do false allegation. If they had done an error, I would expect them to apologise too.

807116 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: ponymo

Since you said this, didn't you conveniently ignore my reply where I rebutt your fake claim about minorities in Pakistan?



I have. You have not bothered to read it.

807116 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: ponymo

Again you're sharing RW propaganda without any research.


But okay, I guess you believe some charlatan dhongi baba over anyone (btw, this fake baba Jaggi has not even read the Act - and is speaking out of his ass).


I have not produced the result of my entire research. Who brought the NRC bill in 2003, under whose instruction etc. I have not mentioned why SC asked the centre to do it backdated as people are unaware of Assam issue.


But for Swara's rants, Jaggi's rebuttal is enough. You be the follower of "intellectual" Swara.

~*sindhu*~ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: flipfl0p


If so, I would defenitely apologise. I don't trust opindia completely. But I read it along with NDTV news to get counter narrative, so that I can balance my views. But I trust Swaraj. They usually don't do false allegation. If they had done an error, I would expect them to apologise too.


It is difficult to verify any facts about anything in today's time thanks to the fake news market. Even if u cross check with different media there are chances that we are still wrong or worse we are left confused 😆 . So its not your fault. We will only know the truth when the movie releases.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".