Deepika shows up at JNU to support students protesting against govt - Page 43

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~

Swarajya wrote an entire article, just on heresay? The article states "said to have been", they haven't even seen the movie. The report is based on social media user's research and IMDB listing.

https://twitter.com/SwarajyaMag/status/1214871873055363073

Swarajya is just like PoopIndia, another RW stooge.

https://twitter.com/Zebaism/status/1214820384798756864

People who are not part of any political group are getting beaten up and still people say that they are part of tukde tukde gang and shouldn't be supported. Kal ko hum logonko koi mar ke chala jayega aur bol dega we were also part of tukde tukde gang so are the rest of the citizens gonna celebrate it? Please stop labelling people and support their crimes.

Originally posted by: ponymo

You can post the part where he contradicts what he says here.

Also, the word persecuted is not even in the Act. They deliberately didn't use it because Hazaras in Afghanistan are also persecuted, Ahmadiyas in Pakistan, Tamils in Sri Lanka, Rohingyas in Myanmar, Uighurs in China - why were they excluded?

I'll post it when I get on laptop. Also what I have read of the draft, documentation is required.

@bold I'll check that again, I won't comment on that part without having full knowledge unlike Farhan Akhtar and Anurag Kashyap.🤪

Originally posted by: Glitter_In_Eye

I'll post it when I get on laptop. Also what I have read of the draft, documentation is required.

@bold I'll check that again, I won't comment on that part without having full knowledge unlike Farhan Akhtar and Anurag Kashyap.🤪

Ok fine. You can get back to me at a later time.

Regarding the barb against Kashyap and Akhtar, they are not historians. No one has full knowledge all the time. It is ok to be mistaken. We all make mistakes. But it is the intent that is to be seen. Akhtar and Kashyap are big celebrities who don't have to give a damn for problems common man faces. Neither are they politicians to get their hands dirty. But still, they do. Because they care. And that alone is worthy of praise.

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

First he does not quotes1941 census (conveniently).

His story only starts by 1951 census of Pakistan. He says (by then) Pakistani side had only 3.44% of minorities. Why?

According to Wikipedia, 5.9 million non Muslims were staying in current provinces of Pakistan in 1941. 3.9 million "migrated" in 1947. (Out of will?). Even that 3.44% is now reduced to 1.5% (or 1). Why?

What is the take? Pakistan did not take 70 years to cleanse its minorities. It did it in first three years itself.

Ponymo and others will conveniently ignore this. Typical Ponymo when answered with facts, goes missing and asks others to fact check and accept mistake. Like look in the mirror Ponymo. 😆

Originally posted by: ponymo

You edited your response to add it later. It wasn't in the original quote to which I replied to.

Also, the answer to your question was already answered in the India Today article.

That 3.5 Million non Muslims were cleansed from Pakistan by 1951 itself?

Why? Was that because of "Migration"?

On NRC, why the left did not oppose NRC in 2003 when Cong introduced the bill?

Was SC stupid to ask the centre to create a registry for citizens? Who is lying again and again?

Asking these questions becomes falling for propaganda?

Instead of Swara who holidays abroad using her passport, if the opposition has produced genuine people who are affected in front of the media, it would have made more impact.

Earlier student revolutions involved the issues which concerned them. Like migrant issue in 80's Assam. Natives became a minority. 90's reservation policies. 50% got benefit. 50% felt robbed. There was both pro and anti rallies, because all students felt it will impact them. Now the protests are limited to couple of universities. Why? Nobody has seen the impacted community except the speeches by left. Such revolutions are fated to fizzle out. In 80's, student union Assam Gana Parishad toppled the government and the student leader became the CM. In today's time, Kanhaiya Kumar himself looses his seat. Why? Nobody is feeling threatened by the left's imaginary fear.

Originally posted by: ponymo

Swarajya is just like PoopIndia, another RW stooge.

Yeah, Caravan is the best🤣

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~

It is difficult to verify any facts about anything in today's time thanks to the fake news market. Even if u cross check with different media there are chances that we are still wrong or worse we are left confused 😆 . So its not your fault. We will only know the truth when the movie releases.

Same for leftist propaganda.

Leftists ka so-called protests jati Aur dharam dekhke nikalta hai. When you follow people like Anurag Kashyap you realize what kind of shit-hole he lives in.

Originally posted by: ponymo

You can post the part where he contradicts what he says here.

Also, the word persecuted is not even in the Act. They deliberately didn't use it because Hazaras in Afghanistan are also persecuted, Ahmadiyas in Pakistan, Tamils in Sri Lanka, Rohingyas in Myanmar, Uighurs in China - why were they excluded?

They are sub groups of Islams. And if in Islamic state they are facing issues what should we comprehend from this?

Muslim nations supported what China is doing to Uighurs.. so why should we include then as as persecuted minorities, when their own brothers n sister nation's don't believe so..

Moreover, CAA is just a FasTrack method to provide citizenship to actual minorities persecuted by the majority... Other minorities(who have isssues within themselves) will get citizenship as per the previous laws...

So what's the outrage about again?

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

Ponymo and others will conveniently ignore this. Typical Ponymo when answered with facts, goes missing and asks others to fact check and accept mistake. Like look in the mirror Ponymo. 😆

I wonder what battery Ponymo uses. Mine needs charging now 😆.