YRF does not take care of their talent

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

sania349

@sania349

Navigator

Posted: 6 years ago

#51

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

she rejected Piku, yeah she wasn't getting good roles 😆

mistakes happen. It's not like she is done acting and is not being offered work. she has more chances in the future if she gets the opportunities. if she has something to offer talent wise, and she does..she should be invested in and offered good roles. this is just my opinion.

but her roles were not good after the flops she had. If she was offered work like piku after those flops..she's not dumb to reject that.😆 that's an unfair thing that she may experience but someone like alia wouldnt...

so a setback will put pari wayyy behind in comparison to those privileged stars you always seem defend😆

atleast piku was offered to her with no outside influence..cant say that for everyone

Quote

Melissaa

@Melissaa

Rocker

Posted: 6 years ago

#52

Originally posted by: MoonOrchid
Pari got demotivated BECAUSE she saw the kind of films she was getting compared to her contemporaries - and THAT is a factor in people starting to be lacklustre.. they lose the self belief asnd the drive.. if they see they get subpar movies/scripts/roles and others get cream of the best stuff available.
Pari probably felt 'shafted' when she was given half baked roles.. and started giving half-hearted performances.
I am sure if she gets a good roles , a good script... you will see the same drive coming back./ Her 'retirement' was also because of that- she felt underused.
Pari
Sonakshi
Vaani
Kriti

Can all deliver great if they get a GOOD script.. a good role.

Adi is not supervising enough the 'Talent' dividion and the people there do a half-arsed job..
I looked earlier at how the career of the YRF launched talent was going and every movie they did after the debut was either okay or bad. rarely a good film as follow up.
Seems they just throw stuff out and see what sticks.
Approach should be more methodical, more professional- comnsidering some people take money ti ..supposedly, 'support' and 'advice' these new stars.

Pari got scripts like Piku, a Dharma movie with Ranbir at his prime (which later got shelved), a movie with SSR which later got shelved .She did get good scripts. Her downfall came when she wanted to be a glam doll instead of an actress. she took a sabbatical of one year to lose weight at the peak of her career (Adi did give her that advice) and after the comeback chose movies like Golmaal 4, Namastey England.

Same with Sonakshi she gave interviews saying that she only wanted to do movies she like to watch (mass, masala movies) so only wanted to play flower pot roles. she chose to play flower pot roles in in Khan, Kumar movies. Lootera was her only substaintial role. It was when she stopped getting such roles she attempted movies like Akira ,Force.

Vaani was a rejected heroine after she messed up her face (another bad ad vice given to her by Adi) but Adi tried to get her TOH (Aamir won so he got Fatima onboard) gave her YRF's big budget movies Shamshera and Tiger vs HR.

YRF hardly produces good movies these days for them to give good projects to their talents. Anushka, Ranveer, Bhumi are successful because they were smart enough to work with other banners and not only limit themselves to YRF only. Even Arjun's most successful movies are non-YRF ones except for Ishaqzaade.

Look at the movies YRF have been producing the past couple of years. They rarely make good movies. Their medium and small budget movies are crap. The big budget event movie with the Khans are the only money makers. That too because of Khan star power.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Male-Chauvinist-Pig

@Ur-Miserable

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#53

Originally posted by: MoonOrchid

Maybe she didn't feel she can do it?
Rejecting one role shouldn't be the end all and be all, no?
RK rejected so many roles, failed so many times, yet he still gets cushy roles- for comparison.
Why can't Pari get same?

Parineeti didn't do movies for nearly 2-3 years, how is that anyone's fault?? If you lose visibilities, how is that anyone else's fault?? Why will anyone cast an actress who never reached the top and than took a long break. She got roles with enough material show her potential like Ishqzaade, Sudh Desi Romance and HTP. You're saying as if was only doing Kill Dill and Dawat-E-Ishq type roles.

Also comparison with Ranbir Kapoor is silly, he took risk with roles like Wake Up Sid and Rocket Singh at very start of his career, when he could have easily gone the rom com and comedy way to success. He found his niche himself, which obviously later got repeated to access. Ranbir isn't your regular type of growth in industry. He took risky projects, which were not massy enough and made them work, yes they failed at box office at times or critically the other, but he isn't someone who got cushion roles as you're saying. Parineeti didn't took that risk, when she rejected something like Piku. Also she bragged about rejecting movies opposite Khans when she had started, so yeah she did get roles which could have given her both popularity and strong roles. And it is not like she wasn't getting roles. Ranbir comparison seriously makes no sense.

Quote

sania349

@sania349

Navigator

Posted: 6 years ago

#54

Originally posted by: Melissaa

Pari got scripts like Piku, a Dharma movie with Ranbir at his prime (which later got shelved), a movie with SSR which later got shelved .She did get good scripts. Her downfall came when she wanted to be a glam doll instead of an actress. she took a sabbatical of one year to lose weight at the peak of her career (Adi did give her that advice) and after the comeback chose movies like Golmaal 4, Namastey England.

Same with Sonakshi she gave interviews saying that she only wanted to do movies she like to watch (mass, masala movies) so only wanted to play flower pot roles. she chose to play flower pot roles in in Khan, Kumar movies. Lootera was her only substaintial role. It was when she stopped getting such roles she attempted movies like Akira ,Force.

Vaani was a rejected heroine after she messed up her face (another bad ad vice given to her by Adi) but Adi tried to get her TOH (Aamir won so he got Fatima onboard) gave her YRF's big budget movies Shamshera and Tiger vs HR.

YRF hardly produces good movies these days for them to give good projects to their talents. Anushka, Ranveer, Bhumi are successful because they were smart enough to work with other banners and not only limit themselves to YRF only. Even Arjun's most successful movies are non-YRF ones except for Ishaqzaade.

Look at the movies YRF have been producing the past couple of years. They rarely make good movies. Their medium and small budget movies are crap. The big budget event movie with the Khans are the only money makers. That too because of Khan star power.

No. her "downfall" or struggle period came from the flops she had one after the other. Do you think she was offered good work after those flops? I highly doubt it. a break is her choice. she was not at her peak after flopping. before he break, she reached a low.

it's sad that actresses with talent like her have to start fresh when delivering flops like that.

while someone like alia will still get high calibre offers even if she flops like that.

that is a difference in privilege right there.

Quote

Hey there :)

@yoyogagirl

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 6 years ago

#55

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

she rejected Piku, yeah she wasn't getting good roles 😆

Don't wanna butt in 😆... but Just wanted to point out that AFAIK she rejected Piku because she was stuck with the 3 film contract from YRF. She says she regrets not being able to star in Piku.

Quote

MoonOrchid

@MoonOrchid

Dazzler

Posted: 6 years ago

#56

But @melissa- all you are saying then it's that Adi gave them bad advice.. be it wait.. do weight loss.. or whatever.

And that was my point: the 'Talent' division in YRF is mishandled- by Adi and the other employees. He needs someone with good script sense and to let casting directors suggest him actors actresses.

The girls saying they want to do masala movies? You really think that's truth? I think they say to explain the spate of flowerpot roles..of unsubstabtial roles.. To excuse them not getting good work..

Quote

566912

Hibernated

Posted: 6 years ago

#57

Originally posted by: sania349

mistakes happen. It's not like she is done acting and is not being offered work. she has more chances in the future if she gets the opportunities. if she has something to offer talent wise, and she does..she should be invested in and offered good roles. this is just my opinion.

I have been her fan since her Dimple Chaddha days. And, she is dumb for rejecting Piku. That is totally on her.

Even now, what is she doing? Namaste England? She has been here. Go out. Talk to people. Go to audition. Read scripts n come back with a bang.

Blaming others for your mistakes -- easy. Bhumi is so not special. I don't even find her as good an actor as Pari. Still bhumi gets movies. Coz she is constantly at it. You have to work hard. After making mistakes, you can't seat at home and opportunities come your way.

I don't understand this blaming YRF & KJo & Alia & stuff. Ayushman is Yrf launch too. And he had such a successful 2018. He has had flops but he kept working. You have to carve your own path. And Pari has totally lost her way.

Quote

Melissaa

@Melissaa

Rocker

Posted: 6 years ago

#58

Originally posted by: sania349

actually no. I dont think adi should be like karan personally. not sure about others. I am talking about mentorship! not givng films on a platter and snatching opportunties from others!
alia and karan are on another level. i have no respect for their unionship and how they operate in bollywood 😆

*people bash karan b/c they dont think its right. rather have an actress/actor struggle and earn their career on their own merit than have alia's career and success Anyday
no one wants that😆

He does mentor his talents. He is no Karan he does not have the paternal instinct for his talents but according to Ranveer he still seek Adi's advice before doing movies. The thing isYRF hardly produce good movies. So if one of their talents do end up doing one of YRF movies it does nothing for their careers.

Quote

Male-Chauvinist-Pig

@Ur-Miserable

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#59

Originally posted by: sania349

mistakes happen. It's not like she is done acting and is not being offered work. she has more chances in the future if she gets the opportunities. if she has something to offer talent wise, and she does..she should be invested in and offered good roles. this is just my opinion.

but her roles were not good after the flops she had. If she was offered work like piku after those flops..she's not dumb to reject that.😆that's an unfair thing that she may experience but someone like alia wouldnt...
so a setback will put pari wayyy behind in comparison to those privileged stars you always seem defend😆

atleast piku was offered to her with no outside influence..cant say that for everyone

You guys say like Parineeti never got good roles, that the likes of LVRB, Ishqakzaade, HTP and Sudh Desi Romance were terrible roles.
One or two setbacks, never pushed back a Madhuri or Katrina or Deepika early in their career.
They made it with whatever they had.
Why you want to blame everything else but Parineeti.
Her taking a long break, rejecting movies against Khans and scripts like Piku, is not anyone else's fault.

Quote

566912

Hibernated

Posted: 6 years ago

#60

Originally posted by: LoveInAutumn26

Don't wanna butt in 😆... but Just wanted to point out that AFAIK she rejected Piku because she was stuck with the 3 film contract from YRF. She says she regrets not being able to star in Piku.

No. She rejected Piku coz she wanted to do a movie with Saifu. Apparently Saifu has been her crush n fav actor since long & she didn't want to lose the opportunity to work with him.

Ise kehte hai.. gadhapan 101.