Who is bigger star ? Leo or SRK ? - Page 6

Poll

Who is bigger star ? Leo or SRK ?

Login To Vote

Created

Last reply

Replies

111

Views

8k

Users

51

Likes

163

Frequent Posters

Cutiepie_Rani thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#51

Originally posted by: LaFUNgA



Main tera Haaye re Jabra, Hoye re Jabra FAN ho gaya😉




😆 ah thanks for giving me a good laugh to kick off the day!!! How ya been? :)
Sultan.Mirza thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 9 years ago
#52

Originally posted by: Cutiepie Rani



😆 ah thanks for giving me a good laugh to kick off the day!!! How ya been? :)


EkDum Mast, Bas dua hai aap jaise doston ki... :) Chalo, phir milenge chalte chalte 😉
SH7_Sunny thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Elite Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#53

Originally posted by: LaFUNgA


This is hilarious, one side you will ask to compare equal BO pull which both Leo & Srk had, other side you will put Leo in comparison to Ab jr who hasn't even given 1 BLOCKBUSTER on his own SOLO, forget acting, BO / ACTING wise both ways, LEO is miles ahead of both AB jr & Srk.

Leo is one of those rare stars who have mixed up content cinema with commercial success, yes he hasn't have big hits in his career list, so does other stars of hollywood also, who remember's Robert Downey Jr's other films beside Avenger series?

Now Will Smith is also remembered for his class act in The Pursuit of happiness, not in Bad Boys, Furious 7 is only remembered more for Paul Walker, even it's phenomenal success worldwide was aided with that point alone.

So when we don't have any HOLLYWOOD STAR who has BIGGEST HITS like we have in Bollywood from Salman, Aamir, Srk or Akki, you see Biggest Grosser list, you will see mixture of films & mixture of stars giving those big HITS.

When in hollywood approach is different, why to corner Leo based on our own desi star's bigger achievement?

U forgot Legendary Titanic and Brilliant Inception which tops Srk's every movie. 😛
Rangaaa thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#54

Originally posted by: Heisenberg.



SRK is to Leo, what Manoj Tiwari of Bhojpuri films is to SRK.

😆...
simplyrdb thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#55

Originally posted by: Heisenberg.



SRK is to Leo, what Manoj Tiwari of Bhojpuri films is to SRK.

Nope 🥱
simplyrdb thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: LaFUNgA


This is hilarious, one side you will ask to compare equal BO pull which both Leo & Srk had, other side you will put Leo in comparison to Ab jr who hasn't even given 1 BLOCKBUSTER on his own SOLO, forget acting, BO / ACTING wise both ways, LEO is miles ahead of both AB jr & Srk.

Leo is one of those rare stars who have mixed up content cinema with commercial success, yes he hasn't have big hits in his career list, so does other stars of hollywood also, who remember's Robert Downey Jr's other films beside Avenger series?

Now Will Smith is also remembered for his class act in The Pursuit of happiness, not in Bad Boys, Furious 7 is only remembered more for Paul Walker, even it's phenomenal success worldwide was aided with that point alone.

So when we don't have any HOLLYWOOD STAR who has BIGGEST HITS like we have in Bollywood from Salman, Aamir, Srk or Akki, you see Biggest Grosser list, you will see mixture of films & mixture of stars giving those big HITS.

When in hollywood approach is different, why to corner Leo based on our own desi star's bigger achievement?

Hilarious is putting Leo ahead on both acting (not even the point here) and BO wise and then knowing when numbers don't match up to those lofty statement use the excuse "Hollywood approach is different" lol

Of course Robert Downer Jr or Johnny Depp and few other "actors" like them aren't that big as stars outside their respective franchises - that's why they aren't "stars" in the same sense as a Bollywood star or for that matter any star from local industries in India. We (India) still have that star culture alive in India which is not the case with Hollywood, that's why SRK is a bigger star than Leo which is what the topic is about. Even Salman is a bigger than Leo too. SRK, Salman etc are still stars like Tom Cruse/Tom Hanks or Will Smith were at their peaks (btw Will Smith is remembered for giving back to back 7 100+ Million movies iirc)

As far as Abhishek goes, he is like Leo or other "actors" of his ilk outside franchise films precisely because of choices he made as an "actor" and the kind of director's he was getting to work with. He took the biggest risks content wise and the films failed in India. They were never going to be biggest grosser's (just like Leo film's). Leo is in that sense like Aamir where both content and box office show some parity because more often than not they did the best films with best reviews/wom. Even he couldn't do much with J Edger, which was mauled critically.
ChotaBheem thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#57

DiCaprio's 10 Highest Grossing Movies Ever

Ben 01.31.14 Most Popular
DiCaprio's 10 Highest Grossing Movies Ever
12shares SHARE

During a recent popular SNL show, Leo ambushed a boastful Jonah Hill warning him of the dangers of being A Big Shot'. This list of DiCaprio's most successful films to date will demonstrate that DiCaprio isn't all talk and no trousers; he's had enough success to make it just about acceptable to publicly mock two-time Oscar Nominee Jonah Hill.

DiCaprio's wildly successful career began in the late 1990s with a couple of shaky performances in Bubble Yum chewing gum ads, and a role in the 1991 Critters III (which was released with the immortal tag line You are what they eat), but within a few years he began to land increasingly interesting roles. The game changer, which really showcased this young star's acting chops, was his role alongside Johnny Depp in What's Eating Gilbert Grape. After this, he went on to become Hollywood's heartthrob as Romeo in Baz Luhrmann's 1996 adaptation of Romeo and Juliet.

And in 1997, with Titanic, DiCaprio was - in his own words - for the first time, in control of (his) career'. By 2000, at the age of 26 he had established himself as a serious actor, seemingly incapable of choosing a flop project.

Since then he has been involved in some of the largest films of the decade, from the critically acclaimed Django Unchained and The Aviator, to the those which made a huge commercial splash like Inception and the recent Wolf of Wall Street. All in all, his films have grossed an astounding $2.3 billion: Now, we're tracing DiCaprio's career with a breakdown of the 10 films starring the actor which grossed the highest according to Box Office Mojo.

VIEW ARTICLE IN LIST VIEW

10. Gangs of New York: $77.8 million

gangs-of-new-york-dicapprio

Scorsese's film gave DiCaprio a chance to act alongside the powerhouse character actor Daniel Day-Lewis in this violent, three hour long gangland film which received 10 Oscars nominations, including Best Picture, Best Actor and Best Director. Gangs of New York marked the end of a two year break from acting for DiCaprio, but despite this it was almost released on the same day as Catch Me If You Can. Amazingly, during a fight scene DiCaprio accidentally broke Day-Lewis' nose, though this didn't stop them finishing the scene.

9. The Wolf of Wall Street: $98.5 million
THE WOLF OF WALL STREET

DiCaprio's latest epic currently places at No.9, but it looks set to rise with tickets in high demand and the film taking in a shocking $10.2m on what's normally one of the slowest days of the year, Christmas day. Controversy surrounding the glorification of the fraudulentJordan Belfort (who has a brief cameo) has failed to prevent this film from generating five separate Oscar nominations including one for DiCaprio himself. DiCaprio had been trying to make the film since 2007, when he read Belfort's account of his rise and fall.

8. The Aviator: $102.6 million
aviator1

This 2004 biopic was DiCaprio's second collaboration with Scorsese. It made a cool $100m, the kind of money that the subject of the film, the millionaire Howard Hughes, would have dreamed of making (Hughes' Hell's Angels, which he made at the age of 22, only took in $8m.) DiCaprio stars alongside Kate Beckinsale, Cate Blanchett, and a straight faced John C Reilly. Following his roles opposite the likes of Tom Hanks and Daniel Day-Lewis, DiCaprio's acting attained new heights in this complicated role as the obsessive business magnate, film director and aeronautical engineer. The Aviator is also notable as the first feature length film with which DiCaprio's production company was involved.

7. Shutter Island: $128 million
Shutter-Island-02-Leonardo-DiCaprio-Mark-Ruffalo

2010 was by all accounts a big year for DiCaprio, with Shutter Island in the spring and Inception in the summer. This was the fourth collaborative effort between Scorsese and DiCaprio, and perhaps surprisingly - given its somewhat understated tone - one of their highest grossing films. Scorsese reportedly considered Robert Downey Jr. and Josh Brolinfor the lead before eventually opting for his long time partner. The film took half of its estimated total $80m budget in the opening weekend alone.

6. The Departed: $132.4 million
Departed

With a cast that includes Jack Nicholson, Alec Baldwin, Mark Wahlberg and Matt Damon it's perhaps unsurprising that this is the most commercially successful film of Scorsese's career, and one of DiCaprio's crowning glories. Nicholson originally turned down the role of the Boston gangster, but changed his mind after a meeting with DiCaprio and Scorsese. In addition to the four Oscars which the film won, it also claims the unusual accolade of the most frequent employment of the word F*ck' (237) of any Best Picture Oscar winner.

5. The Great Gatsby: $144.8 million
THE GREAT GATSBY

Baz Luhrmann's 2013 take on F. Scott Fitzgerald's classic novel received mixed reviews, but this didn't stop fans flocking to the cinema to don 3D glasses and watch DiCaprio play yet another millionaire opposite the beautiful Carey Mulligan. The film is every bit as colourful and extravagant as was Luhrmann'sRomeo + Juliet 17 years previously, and all that opulence didn't come cheap: It cost an estimated $100m to make.

4. Django Unchained: $162.8 million
django-unchained-leonardo-dicaprio-calvin-candie-2012-01

Cast in the role of the outright villain for the first time since 1998, DiCaprio plays the despicable slave owner Calvin Candie opposite Jamie Foxx. The film was shot over a lengthy period of 130 days, meaning that the budget is estimated to have exceed $100m. Tarantino's characteristically violent film tells the tale of a slave's revenge on a planation owner, and although DiCaprio struggled with the extremity of the racist language used by his character, in the final cut he is utterly odious, with cinema audiences purportedly applauding his eventual death.

3. Catch Me If You Can: $164,615,351
catch-me-if-you-can

This 2002 biopic based on the autobiography of a fraudulent conman turned FBI consultant sees a youthful DiCaprio star opposite veteran actor Tom Hanks. Although Spielberg originally wanted Johnny Depp to play the part of Frank Abagnale it's hard to imagine anyone but DiCaprio in the role, so well did he define the character. Although there are none of the CGI effects of Inception, none of the elaborate period costumes of Django, it took the film two decades to make it from pitch to screen, and involved almost 4000 extras; as a result, the budget is estimated to be around $50m.

2. Inception: $292.6 million
guns_inception_men_leonardo_dicaprio_1280x800_5484

Due to its epic scale and star-studded cast which includes Joseph Gordon Levitt, Michael Caine and french actress Marion Cotillard, it's unsurprising that Inception takes the No.2 spot. The film took director Christopher Nolan 8 years to write, but pulled in over $5m in its opening weekend in the UK alone. DiCaprio was paid on a first dollar gross' basis, which meant that he received a percentage of the price of every ticket. Because of this, by August 2010 DiCaprio had been paid over $50m making him the highest paid actor in Hollywood at the time.

1. Titanic: $658.7 million
TITANIC 3D

And so, to the highest grossing film of Leonardo DiCaprio's career that was also, for a long while, the most profitable film of all time. DirectorJames Cameron insisted on the relatively unknown 23 year-old DiCaprio against the studio's wishes, and effectively launched DiCaprio's career into the stratosphere. The enormous budget of $200m (the largest of any 20th century film, and more than the cost of the original Titanic) was spent in part on submarine trips to examine the ship and on a massive set which was completely obliterated in the filming of the scene in which The Grand Stairway is flooded. The film was so successful that cinemas were forced to replace their copies due to overuse.

Glitter_In_Eye thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#58
@CB kya soch k aisa comparison kiya?? 😆
AishMinoz thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#59
meh another thread just to bash srk .
ok Oscar has nothing to do with stardom .Leo is one of the best actors around the world but not the biggest star .
what is his last movie released in India ?
He is just Irrfan khan/manoj bajpayee/naseeruddin shah of india.Tom cruise is the bigger star


664269 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#60
@simplyrdb - yes Leo was never the biggest star like Cruise, Hanks and Smith , as i have mentioned in another thread that why the above mentioned ppl are the biggest movie stars BUT that does not clarify the argument that Leo is less of a star than that of SRK .

On what basis are you comparing ? Records or the supreme reign ? When Leo started and eventually became big in 90s , Hollywood already had Cruise and everybody knows that the kind of run Cruise and then Will smith had at that period when it was not possible for Leo to be considered among their league .

Leo had his criteria of becoming the actor first and then making that reflect into a stardom that's recognized all over the world and yes it happened .

SRK has DDLJ as his legacy and Leo has a bigger one named titanic , SRK still competes with people of his age and his time whereas Leo is above all competition , his movie become classic just by his name ..

Leo was never a movie star and thus the comparison itself is not right here , the bigger star he still is , because I do see Leo being trended and loved much more than that of SRK is , Leo doesn't need to prove his stardom here whereas SRK every year needs to in terms of the stupid 200 cr grossers Bollywood churns out ..


Lastly , I know SRK is a great movie star too but as I said it doesn't make him bigger than the likes of Hollywood stars he's being lately compare with ..

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: MiVida_Messi · 5 months ago

Apparently SRK fan called Ram Sharma leaked the movie online https://x.com/salmanicarman/status/1906265773946880184?s=46...

https://x.com/salmanicarman/status/1906265773946880184?s=46...
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: JackSparrowcraz · 2 months ago

Kajol and Kareena were more popular or bigger stars than Rani? This is about popularity and stardom. I read couple of views on this in a...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Blood_Sacrifice · 4 months ago

Not asking about your fav or who was the better actress. Just asking who was more popular, the bigger superstar, and had more cultural impact...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: naaznin · 17 days ago

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJvj2-7MTUw/?igsh=NzFqeHhobm0wMzNk https://youtube.com/shorts/C9KfPleDaLM?si=7uC9NhLqKVZJiybK They look similar

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 1 years ago

https://twitter.com/ocdtimes/status/1762110811676520841

https://twitter.com/ocdtimes/status/1762110811676520841
Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".