Who do you think was more of a crowd puller in Sholay? - Page 4

Poll

Who do you think was more of a crowd puller in Sholay?

Login To Vote

Created

Last reply

Replies

63

Views

9.1k

Users

22

Likes

63

Frequent Posters

931547 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: atominis

Really?

Dharam was established before but to say Amitabh was lagging in BO is all hokum. Dharam was just called Garam Dharam. No titles like Shehanshah or Big B or Superstar for him.

Amitabh was called one man industry by both Indian and western media.

He was first actor to get more than 1 crore as remuneration and first to get territorial rights of a film as part of remuneration. How did this happen if he wasn't a BO force? He was a powerful star which is why he got this.

He was featured 3-4 times by BBC. And when he featured for first time he was introduced as Asia's biggest star unlike Rajesh Khanna who had one docu on him calling him Bombay superstar. And Dharam was never featured anywhere except for handsomeness.

Dharam isn't embarrassing himself? You think Tinku jiya with a girl old enough to be his granddaughter was okay? He did kissing scenes with Nafisa in that Metro film. He has not done any significant work later.

Whereas this TM in this and other thread has been bashing Amitabh Bachchan and claiming he was inferior in BO or star power and in this thread he brought in failures of Aarakshan, Satyagraha etc to label him flop.

Amitabh is easily being called a media made star even though he had banned media throughout his prime and media too never featured him.

Dharmendra was more established than Amitabh and was senior. Who denies that? But film is memorable for all characters and especially Gabbar, Thakur and then Jai Veeru Basanti.

Acting wise greatest challenge was for Amjad and Sanjeev because their roles were not suited to their personality. The way they worked on their look, voice, expressions to fit in these roles is applause worthy.

I read that Amjad's casting was laughed at when this film was in making. Amazing how he nailed it.


That doesn't mean anything.

Salman & Aamir have no titles either other than bhai & perfectionist.

Nobody but SRK gets featured by the western media but both Salman and aamir have a bigger box office pull than SRK.

30 years from now people will probably be arguing this exact same thing but about SRK and Salman and will be using these same words. But will they be right?
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#32
@Bossman

First take of your bias glasses.

You and your friend deliberately ignored the article by Komal Nahta and another old article from India Today that described how Amitabh was one man industry.

I can post a gazillion proofs of his status. NOT just from media but also by common people.

Amitabh did not stay on longer because at that time there was no way for actors to look young. Khans have several ways to look younger and still stay. Actors back then only had wigs to pass off as young. Amitabh's health took a major beating after that accident and he had to cut down on work. Nobody knew if he would even survive or continue acting.

So what if MPK was biggest hit of 80s? Gadar is biggest of 2000s but it does not make Sunny the biggest star or others inferior.

Amitabh took a break from acting after that fatal Coolie accident. He ventured into politics and other stuff. So the mid 80s slump is due to other reasons and not his lack of star power.

You keep twisting facts. Agneepath is a 1990 film. Not mid 80s. Khuda Gawah is not a disaster. It was below average and still second highest grossing film of 1992 - http://web.archive.org/web/20061205061358/www.boxofficeindia.com/1992.htm
It ran for several weeks in Afghanistan. And is one of Amitabh's most popular films in Middle east.

I would really like to know who was giving much bigger hits than Amitabh when he was at peak. Your Dharmendra?

There is no comparison between Amitabh and SRK in terms of titles because he was not at all talking to media and media too had boycotted him.

Here is an article about the craze unleashed when Amitabh made comeback with Shehanshah - http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/amitabh-bachchan-makes-spectacular-come-back-with-shahenshah/1/329047.html

What came instead was a human tidal wave. The advance booking for Amitabh Bachchan's controversial come-back film shattered all records and in some cases, the windows of booking counters. In Shiela cinema, in the heart of Delhi, a crowd of 20,000 people began collecting from 9 a.m. onwards for the first show. "It was larger than anything anyone can remember. Twenty, thirty times larger," said the owner, Ajay Kaushish.



Then the reports started coming in. The claps whenever Amitabh appeared on the screen, tickets spiralling to Rs.100 and more in the black market, a poor man who said: "Take my rickshaw but let me see the film." "Normally on the first day, the audience is very unruly, they come out on every song," said a theatre owner. "In this case, nobody moved out at all."

Even the video cassette asserted its might, commanding a five-day advance booking. A one minute spot on the video is reported to have cost advertisers several lakhs. In Varanasi, a theatre had an extra show at 7 a.m. on a Sunday: it was house full immediately. "Anyone or anything even vaguely related to Shahenshah is making gold," wrote Dalip Shandil in Evening News. Or as a Bombay film spokesman crudely put it: "Ladka hua hai (It's a boy)."

The Amitabh release after a year and a half proves just how far he is above everyone else in the industry.

Amitabh is still the phenomenon he always was. The people love him. He is one of them, a man who has risen from the masses, becomes a millionaire, gets a beautiful woman's love - and never forgets where he came from. "What else do they want?" asks Raj Chopra, a major Bachchan film distributor. "He takes them from the earth to the skies."

"He has proved that he is still the number one draw despite what the Opposition might say," said Sidheshwar Dayal, a film exhibitor.

This one man has also changed the fortunes of several people. Director Anand was almost bankrupt a few months ago, reduced to making advertising films. Even film exhibitors have been through a lean period. After several months, audiences are returning to cinema halls. "This film can rejuvenate the industry," said Dayal. "Ultimately, it will help other films."

Directors like Prakash Mehra and Yash Chopra can breathe again: all their films with Amitabh were hits, all without him flops. The lesser heroes, however, have suffered. With one eye on Amitabh's return, Jackie Shroff, Dharmendra and Mithun Chakraborty are signing any film that comes their way.



Another excerpt:


The Arrival of Amitabh Bachchan

Amitabh Bachchan's "superstar" status has been documented considerably, both by journalists and by academics.4 Imagined as the "angry man" in the 1970s by the writer duo Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar, Bachchan found himself catapulted into a strikingly new cinematic imagination of political and social turbulence. Writing about the actor in 1996, journalist Avijit Ghosh sums up the moment well: "The hollowness of official slogans like Garibi Hatao ["Eradicate Poverty"] reflected itself everyday in rising prices, growing unemployment and rampant corruption. Cynicism bred easy, accentuated further by the State's insensate treatment... of the JP student movement. But there was also a sense of helplessness that spawned a bitter and impotent rage. It simmered until Amitabh Bachchan showed how the underdog and the underprivileged could strike back. When his clinched fist and baritone boom burst with primeval intensity, in darkened cinema halls smelling of sweat and urine, a nation's eager fantasy came to fruition."5 Bachchan's image as the "angry man" circulated widely and gained the currency of a modern myth. Never before had an actor had this kind of presence, embodying the social and political turbulence of his time. This iconic presence of a single actor also signified major transformations that were taking place in the film industry from the 1970s onwards, an issue that is not always highlighted in existing accounts of Amitabh Bachchan.

The most prevalent industry discourse positioned the star as a "complete actor." 6 This term essentially referred to Bachchan's ability to handle comedy, action, dance, drama and romance. The process that went into the making of the "one man performer" who could do it all himself slowly ushered in a marginalization of comedians and several other peripheral characters who had traditionally provided interruptive relief, on the margins of the main story. Amitabh Bachchan as we all know was a versatile actor who could move easily between brooding anger, comedy, romance and most of all action. Bachchan's stardom coincided with a particular kind of professionalization of action in the industry with stunt directors creating their own space. Bachchan himself became well known for doing his own stunts, something that was taken note of and appreciated by many action directors. M.B Shetty who had simultaneously emerged as the industry's most highly rated stunt director said in an interview, "Show me one actor anywhere in the world who can do the kind of stunts Amitabh does without a double and I'll give you my right arm."7 Bachchan's achievement with stunts was widely reported in the popular press and contributed profoundly to the consolidation of his masculinity.8 Bachchan's limited but well known dancing steps became a familiar presence in several of his films, emerging as the quintessential Bachchan style. Most of all the female lead became marginal as Bachchan reached the position of the highest paid actor in the film industry. The idea of the "complete actor" therefore indicated an overwhelming consolidation of industrial practices around one figure. It is not surprising that the label of "one man industry" was used to identify Bachchan's presence and power.9 Films sold because of his name and presence in the film. The actor was known to move at times between the shooting of three different films, all during the course of a single day. This mythology of stardom can be accessed in the Bachchan posters and reveal carefully worked out iconographic techniques. This was also a marketing strategy in which the industrial landscape, the turbulent political milieu of the period, Bachchan's new style of acting, and stardom, came together.


http://tasveerghar.net/cmsdesk/essay/106/



Edited by atominis - 11 years ago
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: -Ranjha-


Salman's Debut MPK was 80's Biggest Grosser, while Big B was still ruling from 70-80. Audience was way bored of Big B's films, then only KHANS made their mark in Industry.

Big B is still bigger than Khans, but if u gonna put him above Dharmendra, then sorry to say with Debut films hi Khans ne Shehanshah of bollywood ko nichey bitha diya, Now media call Srk King Khan of Bollywood.



@BOLD

Billa ji

Amitabh had taken break from acting after his accident itself. He cut down work to focus on politics and business and by the time Khans came, Amitabh himself had bowed out.

Unke aane se pehle hi baith raha tha woh haalat ke kaaran.


Sultan.Mirza thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 11 years ago
#34
80's Decade's Biggest Hit = MPK

90's Decade's Bigget Hit - HAHK

2000's Decade's Biggest hit = 3 Idiots

Now = Dhoom 3

All with khans, no one else.
Baarish. thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#35
Gabbar! It's like the whole scene gets exciting when he appears!
Sultan.Mirza thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 11 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: atominis



@BOLD

Billa ji

Amitabh had taken break from acting after his accident itself. He cut down work to focus on politics and business and by the time Khans came, Amitabh himself had bowed out.

Unke aane se pehle hi baith raha tha woh haalat ke kaaran.



I agree, but u r also being Bias to Big B, i don't have any BO data for Dharam, but he is for me above Big B in every way. I don't have articles, but known from my mum who is his big fan, that Dharam in his time was huge.

Also may be Dharam is Senior, so Big B after him made his mark?
931547 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#37
@atominis I don't think you're quite understanding me. These articles, this phenomenon means zilch to me. Anybody can get that written for them. The only thing that matters is BOX OFFICE and Bachchan lags behind so many people in that regard that I can never call him the biggest star of all time that you seem hell bent on proving.
He doesn't have the 100+ hits that Dharmendra has, doesn't have the 15 straight hits of Rajesh Khanna or the 6 straight blockbusters of Salman. He doesn't have 12 straight silver jubilees of Rajendra Kumar or the 11 blockbusters of Dilip Kumar. All he has is articles and mandirs.

Bachchan is one of the pillars of Bollywood but so are these other guys. Just because he was hyped more means nothing to me. I won't put him on another stratosphere, he's right there with these other guys. Not above them.
1002013 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#38

Originally posted by: Bossman

@atominis I don't think you're quite understanding me. These articles, this phenomenon means zilch to me. Anybody can get that written for them. The only thing that matters is BOX OFFICE and Bachchan lags behind so many people in that regard that I can never call him the biggest star of all time that you seem hell bent on proving.

He doesn't have the 100+ hits that Dharmendra has, doesn't have the 15 straight hits of Rajesh Khanna or the 6 straight blockbusters of Salman. He doesn't have 12 straight silver jubilees of Rajendra Kumar or the 11 blockbusters of Dilip Kumar. All he has is articles and mandirs.

Bachchan is one of the pillars of Bollywood but so are these other guys. Just because he was hyped more means nothing to me. I won't put him on another stratosphere, he's right there with these other guys. Not above them.

Alright alright shut it now.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#39
@Billa

Personal opinion is subjective. I do not like Dilip Kumar or Rajendra Kumar but that does not mean I deny their stardom.
Amitabh-Dharam comparison makes less sense as Dharam is senior. He did not stop working in mid 80s for a while like Amitabh did.
I read that Nahata article why there was difference between Amitabh and Dharam. Amitabh's films had more pan Indian success compared to Dharam whose success was heavily lop sided to North India. Amitabh has more all India hits than Dharmendra.
From 1979 to 1991 - Amitabh broke opening records 10 times. 10 of his films hold first week records - http://www.naachgaana.com/2012/02/27/first-week-record-holders-since-1979-earlier-post-updated/ (there must be more when 1975 onwards is counted, but data is not available online yet. Definitely ahead of others of that time and not at all like Dharam had more pull than him)
Here is list of top draws of Indian cinema and Amitabh is on top - http://ibosnetwork.com/asp/topactors.asp?isactress=false
(it is old list, needs to be updated but Dharam is second to Amitabh).

@Bossman

Mandirs or frenzy after accident was by fans and general masses not media or PR. So this does matter just as people talk about girls marrying Rajesh's photo in his peak 5 years.

Amitabh had 6 of his films celebrating jubilee run in a single year - 1978 which is still a record. 9 out of 13 all time earners (business of 1 crore per territory) in 70s till 1984 starred Amitabh. Coolie is first film to do business of over 2-3 crores in almost every territory. He has 36 All India hits till 1988, clean and universal successes (excluding the averages and moderate type successes). He did almost 74 films till 1992 out of which 63 are successes (semi hits etc included, films that are not flops). That was solid success ratio, no one compared back then.

Amitabh is biggest box office draw, more successes than Dharmendra - http://ibosnetwork.com/asp/topactors.asp?isactress=false

His films did very well in other countries also. Mard ran for more than a year in Egypt. Hindi films were not allowed even in pirated VCDs in Afghanistan yet Khuda Gawah ran for 10 weeks in Afghanistan.

Amitabh is considered biggest because of extent in increase of business at BO. The star salaries, collections of films etc started coming in "crores" zone with increasing regularity.
His films in his prime rarely made losses. There were flops and then there were "Bachchan flops". A couple of his films attracted packed crowds in theatres after re release which does not happen with any star or film.

He started a couple of new trends like stars doing stage shows and world tours that made star system more popular. First and in his time the only star to get territory rights of film as part of remuneration because of the sheer extent of business his releases used to do compared to other stars.

BTW, when did Dharmendra have 100+ hits? 😲 Sorry but I never read or heard about it anywhere.

I am not hell bent on proving anything. That fact of Amitabh's exceptional innings and career has already been acknowledged so many times by public itself that I do not need to prove it at all.

I have seen this and other forums that keep comparing Amitabh to everybody and claim he was nowhere. Doesn't matter. Truth is Rajesh Khanna got frustrated (look at his career after Amitabh succeeded! He was struggling like a fish denied water) and drank to lows and even Vinod Khanna lost it and went to ashrams as sanyasi when they could not compete at all.

You just have an agenda against Bachchan nothing else. In other thread you called even Dilip Kumar media made star whereas here you are listing his blockbuster record. You now compare him to Khans. Anything to slam down Bachchan! In that filmography thread of yours you were claiming BO doesn't matter whereas here you are listing jubilees and hits of other stars!

You hate Bachchan or dislike him. Fine. But stop trashing facts or making your own theories.

Thanks. Too tired now to continue this discussion for today. Ciao!

Lastly, a guy who is not on speaking terms with media and who had even politicians against him in 80s cannot be a media made star. And you called Dilip Kumar media made too whereas media barely existed or covered stars in his times! Chashma saaf kar ke dekho!


Edited by atominis - 11 years ago
briahna thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#40
stop this bekoofff polling...
why not open a topic on sholay each wk and celebrate it ...thats more like ...
each and every character...jay, veeru, basanti, gabbar, thakur, SOORMA BHOPALI🤣, radha, HARIRAM🤣🤣, JAILOR...hum angrez ke jailor hai...AHAAA...🤣, kaalia, sambha, akbar, ...but the BEST OF ALLL...THE MAUSI🤣🤣



this is the epic of bollywood...can't get any better...which genius wrote these lines, directed these lines...and when you have THE AMITABH BACHCHAN...and THE MAUSI...🤣 BUT ...wait..when dharam comes back with budhiaa going to jail and chakki peecing and peeching...🤣

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKA01mE2K4Y

Lambu jis conversation with Mausi in Sholay

Mausi : Arre beta, bas itna samaz lo ke ghar me jawaan beti seene par
pathhar ke sil ki tarah hoti hai. Basanti ka byaah ho jaaye to chain
ki saans loo.

Jay : haa sach kaha mausi aapne. bada bojh hai aap par.


Mausi : Lekin beta, is bojh ko koi kunwe me to phaik nahi deta.Bura
nahi maananaa , itanaa to poochhanaa hi padataa hai ke ladke kaa
khaandaan kyaa hai uske lachhchhan kaise hai, kamaataa kitnaa hai?


Jay : Kamaane ka to ye hai mausi,..,ke ek baar biwi bachhon ki
jimmedaari sar pe aa gayi to .. kamaane bhi lagegaa.


Mausi : To kya abhi kuchh bhi nahi kamaataa?😆


Jay : Nahi nahi ye maine kba kahaa mausi, kamaataa hai lekin,... ab
roj roj to aadmi jeet nahi sakataa na. .. kabhi haar bhi jaataa hai
bechaaraa?


Mausi : haar jaata hai?🤣


Jay : haan mausi ab ye kambakht juwaa cheej hi aisi hai ab mai kyaa
kahoon ?

Mausi : heynnn. to kya juwaari hai?🤣


Jay : chhi chhi chhi chhi mausi, woh aur juwaari na na. woh to bahot
hi achchha aur nek ladka hai.Lekin mausi, ek baar sharaab pi li na
phir, achchhe bure ka kahaa hosh rahataa hai. Haath pakad ke bitha
liyaa kisi ne juwaa khelane. ab isme bechare Veeru ka kya dosh?


Mausi: Thik kahate ho beta. juwaari woh sharaabi woh lekin, uska koi
dosh nahi...
pure gold


Jay : Mausi aap to mere dost ko galat samaz rahi hai. woh to itanaa
seedha aur bhola hai. aare basanti se uski shaadi karke to dekhiye, ye
juwe aur sharaab ki aadat to do din me chhoot jaayegi.

Mausi : Arre beta, mujh budhiyaa ko samaza rahe ho. ye sharaab aur
juwe ki aadat kisi ki chhooti hai aaj tak
.😆


Jay : Mausi aap Veeru ko nahi jaanati , wishwaas kijiye wo is tarah
kaa insaan nahi hai. Ek baar shaadi ho gayi to woh us gaane-waali ke
ghar jaanaa band kar degaa. bas, sharaab apne aap chhoot jaayegi.


Mausi: Hi hi, bas yehi ek kami raha gayi thi. to kya kisi gaane-waali
ke ghar bhi aanaa jaanaa hai?


Jay : To isme kaunsi buri baat hai mausi. arre , gaana soonane to
raajaa- mahaaraajaa unche unche khaandaan ke log jaate hai, haan
.🤣🤣


Mausi : Achchha ! to beta ye bhi bataate jaao ki tumhare yeh gunwaan
dost kis khaandaan ke hai
?🤣🤣🤣


Jay : Bas mausi, khaandaan ka pataa chalate hi ham aap ko khabar de
denge.


Mausi : Ek baat ki daad doongi beta. bhale sau buraaEyaa hai tumhare
dost me ,phir bhi tumhare munh se us ke liye taareefe hi nikalti hai.


Jay : ab Kya karoo mausi.. mera to dil hi kuchh aisa hai.(pause)...
To.. mai ye rishtaa pakkaa samazoo? epic... 🤣🤣🤣


Mausi : Pakkaa? . bhale saari jindagi ladaki kuwaari baithi rahe.
lekin mai aise aadami se Basanti ko nahi byaahanewaali. Sagi mausi
hoon. koi sautelee maa nahi
. ...GREAT COMEBACK MAUSI🤣


Jay : Ajeeb baat hai. mere itane samazaane par bhi aap ne inkaar kar
diyaa.. Bechaaraa Veeru... naa jaane kya karega?

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: JackSparrowcraz

26 days ago

Is Sholay the best masala entertainer of all time?

Is Sholay the best masala entertainer of all time? If not then name those films which are.

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

1 months ago

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

6 months ago

Sholay AI Version

https://x.com/NagpurKaRajini/status/1894327775835684981

https://x.com/NagpurKaRajini/status/1894327775835684981
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

a month ago

Abir Gulaal is releasing- do you think it will work?

Abir Gulaal is releasing- do you think it will it work?...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue

1 months ago

Aneet Padda and why I think she's the next big thing

At first glance, she seems like she’s leaning into the “sweet girl” trajectory—you know the type. The kind who’ll do breezy rom-coms, smile...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".