Blame-game and hypocrisy! - Page 7

I want to say here only that when jagya was wrong and still when he is redeemed still he should not be happy because he was wrong in past. and still so his character faces so much hate still for 3rd marriage and blah blah. and when he was in jail, sanchi blackmailed jagya I read oh he is getting what he has planted, karma is bitch and so so even after he is redeemed he regretted for his past deeds, when he was crying and sad to see ansh eyelock in hospital, "go jagya go you deserve this thing"

has sanchi redeemed or even got any kinda noticeable punishment ever ?

though as a girl I am strictly against rape thing but I am not feeling sympathy 100% for her as I have seen Jagya as faced so much hate and still facing so much hate then why sanchi should not . at least I will not pamper her. anandi was ready to expose that sadhu in case of asha but now scared when this is happened to her own family? double std much? why I would feel pity for that girl who is wishing for baby s death and mother s death?


and if Ganga s rape is not accepted as rape than I feel very pity just because she is not sister of collector !!! legal rape and illegal rape? i am reading this first time here!!!!

am just giving my view.

Originally posted by: aparnauma

I have seen this rural vs urban debate coming up time and again.

I was brought up in a big city which is quite affluent with lot of avenues for good education and good career prospects too in my chosen field but somehow I ended up in a very small town in fact it was more like a village when i first came to the place where I currently reside.I personally did not have any problems identifying myself with them.If i spend less time with the people of the town it is more to do with lack of time and haven't managed to acquire the fluency in the local language even though I undersand it well.

The only difference that I have noted among people who live in more urbanised and affluent societies and the little less fortunate predominantly rural community is the no of avenues that are available in the cities as opposed to the villages/small towns.The life styles are more dictated by the avenues and resources that are available to them rather than their own mindsets.

Moral values hopes and aspirations are exactly the same whether it is a rural/urban community.

Well the chance of girls falling into bad company and straying are much less in a rural setting simply because the communities are small closed groups where everybody knows the other person.So people are more careful and it is easy to get caught as opposed to big cities where the sheer size of the population and the expanse of the city gives them more space and offers them freedom so the likilihood of youngsters going astray is much higher.It is nothing to do with where they were brought up it's more to do with cities giving them more space.

So I don't feel the makers are being partial to rural life style and showing it in better light.

Jagya was good while in village because of the chances of being caught were higher when he was at home.He went astray in Mumbai because there is no parental supervision and there is lot of freedom which he abused.

Sanchi also got into trouble because of her nature and she abused the freedom.

Village girls are not exposed to the outside world much but when Gauri was exposed to the world outside of her village she changed as she had a chance to explore.

--------------

Anandi - I don't see why her clothes should be seen as a sign of rigidity and resiatnce to change.It can very well be seen as a sign of maintaining her individuality.More than clothes it is all about how she conducts herself. If Sanchi and she did not get along it is more to do with their outlook towards life.Sanchi is too frivolrous and Anandi way too serious.And it has got nothing to do with rural/urban divide.

I do feel that CVs have shown her adjusting to so called city life style in small and subtle ways.She has been shown learning how to make a cake and the other day making pasta for her son.They may be small but are significant.

Who is belittling what happened to Ganga and Gehna????

Nobody is belittling rape of Ganga . They r just putting forward sad legalities . Thats why i said i speak strictly for myself .

Sad legalities- true they are sad because at least Sanchi can seek legal help but the likes of Gehna and Ganga and many others like them who get raped by their husbands every night there is no legal help available because law doesn't recognise it as offense.

Very good post kools. This is what i wrote in another thread started by leaves. Why so much outrage

Suddenly we are following the western culture of free sex etc while the rest of the country ( 90 pct)

Since legal position was posted first by me, so clarifying my point.

True . The badnaami aspect is NOT there in the west . Infact theres utmost sympathy for the raped woman . She is sent to counselling and often goes to sanatorium to heal . It does not affect her prospect of finding a husband etc . But in India the raped woman suffers as its regarded as her fault . She gets no rishtas and is forever seen as 'that raped woman ' . Saanchi will suffer this and with her the Shekhars . I do hope CVs DON'T show her getting married to Saurabh with a pregnancy track coming up . I wish to see CVs handling this for once the correct way ...higher studies , marraige , whatever after this has to be HER choice .