I'm confused, why is what Akshara doing bad? - Page 9

Originally posted by: TheLazySloth

You are saying about concept of "NO". I am saying about concept of common sense. When there is 5-6 people doing a crime and you are 2 including you who is a pregnant women with a complecated twins, you will call the police and wait. Not jump in. Parents should teach some common sense as well.

I am not blaming G'fam for blaming Abhimanyu with attempt to murder. There was enough circumstancial evidence and even an eye witness.

She says I can never trust Abhimanyu and Manjari back. Did she forgot that her sister and her bade papa blamed her as well..? She can trust them again..? There is no problem... But.... She can't trust Abhimanyu. Ok.

Nonetheless, Akshara was never blamed of being a "murderer". Let that be clear.

She was blamed of her carelessness and wrong decision making which led to such tragedies.

The blame on Akshu and blame on Abhi are incomparable.

Could have been comparable if after the death he was accused as he was responsible for death by taking Nav to the cliff. But the murder accusation is not comparable at all.

Originally posted by: Deltablues

1. Abhimanyu still has the parental custody. He promised to his minor son that he, the minor child, wouldn't have to live without the presence of his parents. But legally he still has all the power and benefit. He could make Abhir stay with him if he wished. Or, he could choose to be a very involved co-parent to his minor son without depriving him of a stable family environnent. He isn't the victim here. He, as an adult, took a decision to comply his minor son's wishes. Every parent prioritises their child's well being over their own wishes. Abhimanyu did the same. Who exactly wronged him?

2. If he were so distraught and uncomfortable with the party/picnic/soiree, he could have said a simple "No". He is an adult. Parents should teach children to say as well as to accept and respect a "No." It's almost as if "No" as a concept doesn't exist in this show's writer's room.

3. Abhinav drank on his own accord. That doesn't make Abhimanyu's actions or intentions pure. We as an audience know that Abhimanyu will be deemed innocent — because we read the producer's interview, and we know logistically it doesn't make sense to kill off one love interest and turn the other one into a murderer in a daily soap. The characters of the show do not know that. To them, Abhimanyu has motives to hurt Abhinav, and his actions are cunning. For all they know, he could have taken Abhinav to the edge— leveraging their friendship — and could have pushed him off the cliff with or without the alcohol. The characters of the show haven't read Shahi's interview and therefore do not know that it'd be deemed an accident.

4. Also Also Also, it is still not comparable to Akshara getting accused of murders by her spouse and in-laws because a) the power dynamic isn't the same b) the motive wasn't there, and c) the circumstantial evidence present against Dr Birla wasn't there in Akshara's case. She was well and truly innocent.

I am just talking about the writing of the story and not bashing any character/actor/fandom.

This is Star Plus YRKKH... No real life things happen here bro..😂😂 otherwise a man who loves her wife soo much will never leave her for what happened...He may be temporarily angry but will correct his mistake soon (which Abhi tried to do to some extent but Bade Papa being Bade Papa closed all the doors)

and secondly...a such rich lady (both daughter of a rich house and bahu of a rich fam) doesn't end up with a stranger cab driver, however good he may be,(not demeaning his profession 🙏) and name him the father of her and her husband child.

Nothing is real life😂😂🙏

Originally posted by: Indira1211

I think akshara can get the custody decision reversed now. Abhimanyu has a criminal record ..if he gets convicted,,but even if he doesn’t ..she can use her law degree to show she’ll be working and earning and can support herself and abhir and that she has a house in kausauli.but either way..giving abhimanyu custody was totally illogical..it never happens like that in real,life, the sharmas were a family and they weren’t poverty stricken..living on the streets..so there’s no,court that would have taken abhir from them,.we know that..and Abhimanyu being rich would have Been asked to pay child support..that’s how it works in real life and he would have been given weekends like single divorced dads get..🤷🏻‍♀️

This is a fictional show

Didn’t the judge mention that Akshara has a case for the fraud of birth certificate?

Originally posted by: Indira1211

I think akshara can get the custody decision reversed now. Abhimanyu has a criminal record ..if he gets convicted,,but even if he doesn’t ..she can use her law degree to show she’ll be working and earning and can support herself and abhir and that she has a house in kausauli.but either way..giving abhimanyu custody was totally illogical..it never happens like that in real,life, the sharmas were a family and they weren’t poverty stricken..living on the streets..so there’s no,court that would have taken abhir from them,.we know that..and Abhimanyu being rich would have Been asked to pay child support..that’s how it works in real life and he would have been given weekends like single divorced dads get..🤷🏻‍♀️

Originally posted by: gopi2929

This is a fictional show