Confusion about bigamist Akshara - Page 8

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Even if Abhimanyu submitted divorce papers in court, both parties have to attend hearings which Akshara didn't

Not attending divorce proceedings won't fasten it, it delays it

Most importantly since Akshara and Abhimanyu weren't living separately for one year before filing for divorce which is mandatory for mutual consent divorce

Signing a paper is not divorce, I can agree that Abhimanyu filed for exparte procedure but that takes 2-3 years

The fact that she married within 5-6 months of signing divorce papers makes it bigamy, she never followed any legal procedure

Akshara, by running away, not disclosing about her pregnancy and not filing a proper divorce case committed many frauds and crimes

@bold no in case of "cruelty" and "adultery" divorce is finalized without spouse attending divorce hearing and 2 year time period isn't also required in that case.

According to Abhimanyu, he divorced Akshara because she was reason behind Neil and unborn child's death, judge could've easily finalized divorce, on grounds of Abhimanyu's spouse was cruel and abandoned him. Akshara need not attend hearing being killer of Neil and her unborn child (according to Abhimanyu), Divorce was finalized without Akshara attending court. If viewers didn't spare Kartik from bigamy charges to makers him divorce Naira then register his marriage with Vedika would they spared Akshara if divorce wasn't finalized? They made Abhimanyu and Akshara sign divorce papers to ensure there are no bigamy charges on Akshara after getting married to AA, the way there were on Kartik. There are too many what ifs left to viewer's interpretation. We don't know when exactly Akshara got married to Abhinav was it after 6 months 8 months or an year. Akshara proposed Abhinav after Abhir's birth but did they show her registering her marriage with Abhinav that exact time? Six years leap and them pretending to be husband-wife does that prove they got married exactly after 6 months of Ak signing divorce papers?

If divorce wasn't finalized and Abhimanyu didn't press charges against supposed bigamist Akshara then that means "according to the story writers" divorce was finalized before Akshara got married to Abhinav otherwise they would've made Abhimanyu mentioning it. There was so much to explore storywise that way. According to the story writers Akshara and Abhinav's marriage was legal which means Abhimanyu got divorce finalized on grounds of his spouse being cruel, brother's and children's killer etc and him being the victim, we can interpret anything we want to but we are not the writers of Gen 3. According to story writers Akshara is not a bigamist, that's the only truth. We can interpret the plot the way we want to, but if plot writers didn't mention FL of Gen 3 as bigamist then she wasn't.

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

@bold no in case of "cruelty" and "adultery" divorce is finalized without spouse attending divorce hearing and 2 year time period isn't also required in that case.

According to Abhimanyu, he divorced Akshara because she was reason behind Neil and unborn child's death, judge could've easily finalized divorce, on grounds of Abhimanyu's spouse was cruel and abandoned him. Akshara need not attend hearing being killer of Neil and her unborn child (according to Abhimanyu), Divorce was finalized without Akshara attending court. If viewers didn't spare Kartik from bigamy charges to makers him divorce Naira then register his marriage with Vedika would they spared Akshara if divorce wasn't finalized? There are too many what ifs left to viewer's interpretation. We don't know when exactly Akshara got legally married to Abhinav was it after 6 months 8 months or an year. Akshara proposed Abhinav after Abhir's birth but did they show her registering her marriage with Abhinav that exact time? Six years leap and them pretending to be husband-wife does that prove they got married exactly after 6 months of Ak signing divorce papers?

If divorce wasn't finalized and Abhimanyu didn't press charges against supposed bigamist Akshara then that means "according to the story writers" divorce was finalized before Akshara got married to Abhinav otherwise they would've made Abhimanyu mentioning it. There was so much to explore storywise that way. According to the story writers Akshara and Abhinav's marriage was legal which means Abhimanyu got divorce finalized on grounds of his spouse being cruel, brother's and children's killer etc and him being the victim, we can interpret anything we want to but we are not the writers of Gen 3. According to story writers Akshara is not a bigamist, that's the only truth. We can interpret the plot the way we want to, but if plot writers didn't mention FL of Gen 3 as bigamist then she wasn't.

Nope

The papers which both Abhimanyu and Akshara had signed were from Khera case, it had nothing to do with Neil's death so they showed a mutual divorce proceeding in the show, also Abhimanyu went to Goenka house looking for her

Your entire focus is on what Abhimanyu did, tell me what did Akshara do to get a divorce and marry again?

According to story writers, Vidya is Armaan's ma like Abhira is Pookie's ma

When I watch a show, I don't turn off my brain, I gather you agree with everything that story writers show, good for you

I guess we are done here? Thanks for the discussion

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Nope

The papers which both Abhimanyu and Akshara had signed were from Khera case, it had nothing to do with Neil's death so they showed a mutual divorce proceeding in the show, also Abhimanyu went to Goenka house looking for her

Your entire focus is on what Abhimanyu did, tell me what did Akshara do to get a divorce and marry again?

According to story writers, Vidya is Armaan's ma like Abhira is Pookie's ma

When I watch a show, I don't turn off my brain, I gather you agree with everything that story writers show, good for you

I guess we are done here? Thanks for the discussion

@bold that's oldie KP's perspective, the way it's her perspective Abhira can never experience motherhood completely forgetting she already did. According to KP whatever she did with Shivani was justified. We can believe her perspective to be true or just consider her oldie who is experiencing partial amnesia it's up to us or we can consider her an antagonist who can say and do anything to satisfy her ego all three perspective regarding character are up to us. According to writers she is not a thoroughly positive character, but a manipulative matriarch who set stories that benefit her the most. We can agree or disagree or criticize characters but the scenarios like divorce finalization which aren't ever shown in the story we can't negate them just because writers didn't care to show how, when and why divorce was finalized. Contrary scenarios like Abhira got pregnant previously which writers themselves showed, that negates KP's claims of infertility.

Claiming a scenario like "Akshara was bigamist" to be true, based on assumptions without seeing proofs in story is like blurring the lines between fiction and mere assumptions.

Writers could've shown that Abhimanyu kept signed divorce papers locked up in cupboard and got them out during his wedding 2.0 ceremonies, beside showing that to support their claims that Akshara-Abhimanyu's divorce wasn't finalized, they could've shown Akshara filed divorce petition on grounds of her spouse being cruel, which got rejected only then the "assumptions" can be proven true.

There is a difference between shutting your brain while watching fiction and assuming scenarios that can never be negated by past references or scenes to prove a point.

Akshara was never a bigamist ✌️

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

@bold that's oldie KP's perspective, the way it's her perspective Abhira can never experience motherhood completely forgetting she already did. According to KP whatever she did with Shivani was justified. We can believe her perspective to be true or just consider her oldie who is experiencing partial amnesia it's up to us or we can consider her an antagonist who can say and do anything to satisfy her ego all three perspective regarding character are up to us. According to writers she is not a thoroughly positive character, but a manipulative matriarch who set stories that benefit her the most. We can agree or disagree or criticize characters but the scenarios like divorce finalization which aren't ever shown in the story we can't negate them just because writers didn't care to show how, when and why divorce was finalized. Contrary scenarios like Abhira got pregnant previously which writers themselves showed, that negates KP's claims of infertility.

Claiming a scenario like "Akshara was bigamist" to be true, based on assumptions without seeing proofs in story is like blurring the lines between fiction and reality.

Abhimanyu kept signed divorce papers locked up in cupboard and got them out during his wedding 2.0 ceremonies, beside showing that to support their claims that Akshara-Abhimanyu's divorce wasn't finalized, they could've shown Akshara filed divorce petition on grounds of her spouse being cruel, which got rejected only then the "assumptions" can be proven true.

There is a difference between shutting your brain while watching fiction and assuming scenarios that can never be negated by past references or scenes to prove a point.

It is not only her perspective, whatever she did with Shivani was a crime but who filed a complaint against her and because it was never brought up in the show or you never saw them mentioning it, would you say Kaveri didn't commit crimes against Shivani? Maybe you won't but I do

For me both Vidya and Kaveri are criminals here

You wrote many different scenarios and we both know you haven't seen those episodes, you continuously missed scenes, you didn't even know that Abhimanyu and Arohi got engaged after leap, you didn't know from where they got those divorce papers

I am here for a logical discussion, none is forcing you to believe what is written in my thread, you are allowed to form your own opinions, none is stopping you from doing so however it would help if you actually watch episodes

Akshara took no steps towards finalizing her divorce before she married, she signed and ran away, hiding about pregnancy and committing many frauds/crimes, you can make assumptions of Abhimanyu doing everything FOR HER MARRIAGE TO BE LEGAL, I am asking you what did the person who got married did considering, she is the one who committed bigamy not Abhimanyu

Your argument to everything is "Abhimanyu's must have done this or that" none of that was shown, he went back to look for her that tells you that he wasn't actively seeking divorce, so whatever hopes you have from Abhimanyu are actually negated by the show/episodes

Akshara was a bigamist like Kaveri is a criminal, you are allowed to accept show's narrative on both front, I don't shut my brain while watching fiction.

If instead of arguing with me, you think what actually Akshara did to get divorce and marry again, you will have the answer, you probably will understand what I am talking about, Abhimanyu must have done it is not the answer for Akshara's actions, she wasn't a child but was studying to be a lawyer

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Nope

The papers which both Abhimanyu and Akshara had signed were from Khera case, it had nothing to do with Neil's death so they showed a mutual divorce proceeding in the show, also Abhimanyu went to Goenka house looking for her

Your entire focus is on what Abhimanyu did, tell me what did Akshara do to get a divorce and marry again?

According to story writers, Vidya is Armaan's ma like Abhira is Pookie's ma

When I watch a show, I don't turn off my brain, I gather you agree with everything that story writers show, good for you

I guess we are done here? Thanks for the discussion

Very well written.....

I second you, Mswhiskerson and anybody watching without biasedness could see, that's not how DIVORCES happen in India, if it was, then even Armaan-Abhira are legally divorced A divorced couple living under one roof If DKP couldn't take pain to show even 1 formal proceedings of divorce, then even we aren't going to take pain & do speculations that- hua hoga kuch, hogaya hoga aise vaise, tedhe-medhe way me

Hence, Akshara Gen3 will always & forever be a BIGAMIST. Period. Even their 100pages long thesis can't make us believe otherwise.

And Fake Sharmas' marriage was always an illegal one. Akshara & Abhinav's always illegal & sham of a marriage Hence, null & void in the eyes of law, doesn't matter how endlessly people like to stretch debate on it. DKP can't play with the law of the land & legalities at their own convenience. They can't keep changing law of India in every season.

Sirf ✌🏻️ kardene dene se thodi na koi point prove hojane wale hai.Even their innumerable attempts to coax us, can't make us believe otherwise, just like they won't.
People can have their own opinion, but they can't coax others into accepting their beliefs.

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

It is not only her perspective, whatever she did with Shivani was a crime but who filed a complaint against her and because it was never brought up in the show or you never saw them mentioning it, would you say Kaveri didn't commit crimes against Shivani? Maybe you won't but I do

For me both Vidya and Kaveri are criminals here

You wrote many different scenarios and we both know you haven't seen those episodes, you continuously missed scenes, you didn't even know that Abhimanyu and Arohi got engaged after leap, you didn't know from where they got those divorce papers

I am here for a logical discussion, none is forcing you to believe what is written in my thread, you are allowed to form your own opinions, none is stopping you from doing so however it would help if you actually watch episodes

Akshara took no steps towards finalizing her divorce before she married, she signed and ran away, hiding about pregnancy and committing many frauds/crimes, you can make assumptions of Abhimanyu doing everything FOR HER MARRIAGE TO BE LEGAL, I am asking you what did the person who got married did considering, she is the one who committed bigamy not Abhimanyu

Your argument to everything is "Abhimanyu's must have done this or that" none of that was shown, he went back to look for her that tells you that he wasn't actively seeking divorce, so whatever hopes you have from Abhimanyu are actually negated by the show/episodes

Akshara was a bigamist like Kaveri is a criminal, you are allowed to accept show's narrative on both front, I don't shut my brain while watching fiction.

If instead of arguing with me, you think what actually Akshara did to get divorce and marry again, you will have the answer, you probably will understand what I am talking about, Abhimanyu must have done it is not the answer for Akshara's actions, she wasn't a child but was studying to be a lawyer

Kaveri confessed her crimes Infront of her family, they showed her giving money to a man to keep Shivani in ashram. There are proofs of her being a criminal, her own confession. There was a track exposing her past misdeeds. She didn't get punished because nobody pressed any charges against her but her own confession, Vidya's confession to be her accomplice, can't be negated just because she wasn't punished.

Did Akshara confessed to be a bigamist or did Abhimanyu claimed she was a bigamist? Was there any track to prove her as one exposing her misdeeds? They didn't show what Akshara did during those 6 years.

Akshara was Abhinav's legal wife and KP was behind Shivani's abduction, child's abduction (sending him to orphanage without his parents knowledge) and fake death certification, making her son a bigamist without his knowledge according to story.

Won't discuss further, as Akshara won't be proven a bigamist based on your assumptions "what she did to remarry Abhinav legally?". We didn't see what happened during those six years. No character, scenario, past scenes, proofs or any reference, her confession or any other character's confession prove her to be a bigamist.

Many were of view KP was behind Shivani's disappearance because of her hatred for Shivani, but it couldn't be proven with certainty without her confession and scenarios that unfold after Shivani's entry.

You still want to believe Akshara was a bigamist it's your choice.

Originally posted by: ShadowImbue

Kaveri confessed her crimes Infront of her family, they shown her giving money to a man to keep Shivani in ashram. There are proofs of her being a criminal, her own confession. There was a track exposing her past misdeeds. She didn't get punished because nobody pressed any charges against her but her own confession, Vidya's confession to be her accomplice, can't be negated just because she wasn't punished.

Did Akshara confessed to be a bigamist or did Abhimanyu claimed she was a bigamist? Was there any track to prove her as one exposing her misdeeds? They didn't those 6 years of what Akshara did.

Akshara is Abhinav's legal wife and KP was behind Shivani's abduction, child's abduction (sending him to orphanage without his parents knowledge) and fake death certification, making her son a bigamist without his knowledge according to story.

Won't discuss further, as Akshara won't be proven a bigamist based on your assumptions "what she did to remarry Abhinav legally?". We didn't see what happened during those six years.

They forget that Akshara Abhimanyu have divorce processing before that too....last time the have to sign tha papar and they are divorced... You have to do it again and again..

They already have done the whole processing of divorce during khera time and only last submitting is pending that happens on white day...

Asia nhi ki jab man chaha dubara dubara divorce processing start kar do....ya dubara we go through karna padta hai...next time same parson ke sath or asani se divorce ho jata hai....court to ye pehle jaa chuke the...(Tenu like me jawaga tab wo divorce ki copy fad daiti hai) ...

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

Wow!! Very well written..... I second you, Mswhiskerson and anybody watching without biasedness could see that's not how DIVORCES happen in India, if it was, then even Armaan-Abhira are legally divorced .A divorced couple living under one roof If DKP couldn't take pain to show even 1 formal proceedings of divorce, then even we aren't going to take pains & do speculations that- hua hoga kuch, hogaya hoga aise vaise, tedhe-medhe way

Hence, Akshara Gen3 will forever remain a BIGAMIST. Period.

And Fake Sharmas' marriage was always an illegal one. Akshara & Abhinav's always illegal. Hence, null & void in the eyes of law, doesn't matter how endlessly people like to stretch debate on it. DKP can't play with the law of the land & legalities at their own convenience. Thy can't keep changing law of India in every season.Sirf ✌🏻️ kardene dene se thodi na koi point prove hojata hai.

If one removes the glasses of favouritism they might see reason, but like Armaan is defended for Daksh incident Akshara is defended as well, somehow they are not old enough to do anything, everything has to be done by the other party

Akshara was a bigamist and a fraud, her paternity fraud was clearly shown in the show, court ordered trial against her

One can say DKP doesn't follow law, I agree with you, they don't follow anything, they don't have a moral compass so whatever discussion we all have is futile, you can have only one stand, either watch as a show then there's no discussion, discussion involves logical reasoning and interpretation skills

Originally posted by: Jhanak1234

They forget that Akshara Abhimanyu have divorce processing before that too....last time the have to sign tha papar and they are divorced... You have to do it again and again..

They already have done the whole processing of divorce during khera time and only last submitting is pending that happens on white day...

Asia nhi ki jab man chaha dubara dubara divorce processing start kar do....ya dubara we go through karna padta hai...next time same parson ke sath or asani se divorce ho jata hai....court to ye pehle jaa chuke the...(Tenu like me jawaga tab wo divorce ki copy fad daiti hai) ...

Bro, divorce is not a game which you can pause and start from where you left off

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Bro, divorce is not a game which you can pause and start from where you left off

Akshara is the criminal who did

Paternity fraud

Bigamy

Used fake passport and ran away with khera.

Lied to protect her little sister in hit and run case.

Protectdd kairav when he was criminal infront of court.

She can not even become lawyer as she herself is involved in crime. If dkp can show that then bigamy dikhana kaafi aasaan hai