Doesnt tappu face jail for attempt of murder - Page 5

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

Ankit ji I have nothing to say to u and nor do I want to read ur nonsensical posts😆 Best to ignore each other😆

BUT u read it and replied too. do u think only ur nonsensical post r deserved to be read. if u will talk nonsense dont expect tht everybody will accept it silently.😆

Originally posted by: tvfreaq

"I agree she was silly she was stupid and she was not sensible and spoke rubbish but really...why exaggerate the truth"


huh!!!Silly people can actually get a sick man to shoot himself...and tappu was just being stupid and not in her senses???is that how simple it looked???

Yes it did! Tapu says bitter things to everyone when she gets insulted. The only difference this time is that she very stupidly didnt think who she was talking to and what effect her words would have

Originally posted by: tvfreaq

why does ichcha deserve jail??

soory...i goofed😆😆

yes cvs will conveniently forget that tappu is criminal....

unfortunately...they need to do that to run a serial😊

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

unfortunately...they need to do that to run a serial😊

Yes serial can't run without a vamp so Tapu wont be shown in Jail as she will be busy doing more plotting and scheming to take her pakau revenge from Veer-Ichcha 😆

There is no Mens Rea needed for abettment to suicide. When you abet suicide, it means you are not aware that your actions can cause someone to take their life. Its only a matter of instigation. And there is a series of circumstances leading upto it right from his marraige night and also the fact that Taps hates Ichcha.

About Veer, how can he think she was just being stupid? Is that the way to talk to a person like calling him mad, druggie etc? And she called him mad, means she was aware that he was mentally disturbed.
Btw Nandish acted great in this scene.

Also she is directly guilty for attempt to murder, these are all extenuating circumstances by which a good lawyer can prove her gulity even in the abettment to suicide case too.

There are no hard or fast riules in law apart from the basic things given in the law books itself. Every case is different, you can give case studies relating to previuous judgements but ultimately the judge takes the decision based on the present case only and it might not have any precedent in law.

Originally posted by: Greenbear

There is no Mens Rea needed for abettment to suicide. When you abet suicide, it means you are not aware that your actions can cause someone to take their life. Its only a matter of instigation. And there is a series of circumstances leading upto it right from his marraige night and also the fact that Taps hates Ichcha.

About Veer, how can he think she was just being stupid? Is that the way to talk to a person like calling him mad, druggie etc? And she called him mad, means she was aware that he was mentally disturbed.
Btw Nandish acted great in this scene.

Also she is directly guilty for attempt to murder, these are all extenuating circumstances by which a good lawyer can prove her gulity even in the abettment to suicide case too.

There are no hard or fast riules in law apart from the basic things given in the law books itself. Every case is different, you can give case studies relating to previuous judgements but ultimately the judge takes the decision based on the present case only and it might not have any precedent in law.

I did not think about abettment to suicide.😕 Good observation 👏
You are right no requirement for Mens Rea there.

Though I am still not entirely convinced that a judge would condemn her because Vansh followed Tapasya there and not the other way around.
Still it does depends on the case presented and the presiding judge.

One more point here is that if Vansh would have survived that he would have told Tapu's truth in front of everybody which is d last think Tapu wanted to happen and judge will have to consider that as well

Originally posted by: shyams

One more point here is that if Vansh would have survived that he would have told Tapu's truth in front of everybody which is d last think Tapu wanted to happen and judge will have to consider that as well

all those points dont matter😆 the judge isnt going to look to the IFs and BUTs if there is clear evidence of it not being a crime. Can we end this discussion? Like ive said call any professional unbiased lawyer here and ask them! dhood ka dhood aur pani ka pani ho jayega!