Doesnt tappu face jail for attempt of murder - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

102

Views

6.9k

Users

12

Likes

109

Frequent Posters

ankit111 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#61

Originally posted by: shyams



Yes ji it doesn't matter if judgment is already decided b4 d debate but it will matter if d lawyer is arguing in court and have brought this to judge's notice ๐Ÿ˜†


Shyam jiiii, whom u r trying to convince???? dont u know the result๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†. CVs the only judge of the show hv decided tht Tapu is guilty, and its evident everybody,s hate of Tapu for the same reason. BTW if u r going to consult a lawer don go to a Law STUDENt even free of cost, becoz LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS THN NO KNOWLEDGE๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†
BayAreaGuru thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#62

Originally posted by: Greenbear



There is no self defense plea in her case because Vansh told her that Veer and Ichcha are coming and you see how I expose you in front of them. He had no intention to kill her then.

As I said court only comes later but an FIR can very well be lodged, she can go to prison and then maybe get bail. But Taps has not yet gone to prison for this.



Yes Vansh just wanted to expose Tapu in front of Veer & Ichcha and that's when Tapu started telling all that crap but again if SRK ji has already passed judgment b4 debate then what's d point of us telling anything ๐Ÿ˜†
groucho thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#63

Originally posted by: Greenbear

There is Mens Rea, as in Taps did not want to be exposed in front of Veer and family which Vansh was about to do, she knew he was mad or mentally unstable (she called him mad), was feeling guilty and in the circumstances used his guilt to save her skin so that she is not exposed.
She hid that blood stained stole, she even stole money and God's ornaments so that she could pay off Sid, so that he would remain quiet.
All this shows that she did not want to be exposed, would go to any lengths to stop it.
Even when Veer was being accused, she did not open her mouth, Veer did pyar ka natak and she told him some half truth.
This all proves she is not stupid and very much had a guilty mind.



Much though I would like to agree with you here. All the above-mentioned were after the event. That shows a self-preservation instinct because she did not want to be seen at the scene of the crime.

She is not stupid and has a devious mind but I still feel Vansh's suicide in the eyes of the law cannot nail Tapasya but Veer certainly can.
Greenbear thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#64

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr



๐Ÿ˜† Guilty mind as in INTENTION! Did she have an intention to kill Vansh?



If she had INTENTION to kill Vansh, then it would amount to murder which is not needed in a abettment to suicide case.

She wanted not to be exposed and would have gone to any lengths to stop it which is proved by her future acts.

SRKLuvr thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#65
Greenbear ji๐Ÿ˜† IFs and BUTs as Im saying again๐Ÿ˜† Could Tapu be sure that Vansh wouldnt shoot her? Dont forget he was instable and can do anything at anytime. So YES if someone is pointing a gun at ur head u have perfect right to defend urself! And she didnt use a knife or gun or whatever she just used words! The judge would also see that Vansh had brought a gun..meaning he was definitely in a murderous mood also that he had followed her there! What about all that?

Ab bass! Having studied law for 4 years I FLATTER myself to know that no way this makes any case! However I dont wish to waste my time on it anymore!
SRKLuvr thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#66

Originally posted by: groucho



Much though I would like to agree with you here. All the above-mentioned were after the event. That shows a self-preservation instinct because she did not want to be seen at the scene of the crime.

She is not stupid and has a devious mind but I still feel Vansh's suicide in the eyes of the law cannot nail Tapasya but Veer certainly can.



Yaar reading some SENSE on this forum really makes a nice change!
Greenbear thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#67

Originally posted by: shyams



Yes Vansh just wanted to expose Tapu in front of Veer & Ichcha and that's when Tapu started telling all that crap but again if SRK ji has already passed judgment b4 debate then what's d point of us telling anything ๐Ÿ˜†



Yeah she is going on and on about intention to kill, over here in India recently some airhostess committed suicide because a pilot she was seeing refused to marry her or something.
A case of abettment was lodged against him by her parents, he even spent some time in prison for this just because he refused to marry her. Now he is out on bail.
He had no INTENTIOn to kill her.

But Srkji is applying australian law I suppose. ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†
๐Ÿ˜†
BayAreaGuru thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#69

Originally posted by: Greenbear



Yeah she is going on and on about intention to kill, over here in India recently some airhostess committed suicide because a pilot she was seeing refused to marry her or something.
A case of abettment was lodged against him by her parents, he even spent some time in prison for this just because he refused to marry her. Now he is out on bail.
He had no INTENTIOn to kill her.

But Srkji is applying australian law I suppose. ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†
๐Ÿ˜†



Yes apply whatever law suits u ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†


ankit111 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#70

Originally posted by: Greenbear



Yeah she is going on and on about intention to kill, over here in India recently some airhostess committed suicide because a pilot she was seeing refused to marry her or something.
A case of abettment was lodged against him by her parents, he even spent some time in prison for this just because he refused to marry her. Now he is out on bail.
He had no INTENTIOn to kill her.

But Srkji is applying australian law I suppose. ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†
๐Ÿ˜†


recently a hot news was tht in Rakhi Ka Insaaf, after being insulted someone did suiside and there is going to be file a case against her. so as i told little knowledge is dangerous thn no knoledge๐Ÿ˜†

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".