Akshaye Khanna on nepotism: The 200 to 250 families of the film - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

45

Views

5001

Users

29

Likes

172

Frequent Posters

Posted: 6 years ago
People falsely conflating success with access to opportunity, two are completely different things.  Nepotism is the practice of favouring your own family and friends, with or without merit.  Most of these star kids wouldn't be here if it were not for their parents.  
Yeh, there are a couple of star kids who are successful, but when the pool of 'talent' comprises overwhelmingly of bollywood insiders, it is not surprising, that a some of these might become successful.  That doesn't change the fact that they got the opportunity handed them without struggle.  Opportunity is a precondition to being successful.

The thing is, when you're launching someone new, as history as shown, it doesn't matter what illustrious film family, lineage you are from, it makes no difference, the risk is the same, whether you're an insider or outsider.  So why limit yourself to a tiny pool of bollywood insiders, when you've got the whole country?

Some of the biggest names in Bollywood history are outsiders, Dilip Kumar, Rajesh Khanna, Amitabh, SRK, Akshay Kumar etc.
StevieG thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: ranikaadi



Forced might be an abstract concept, but saying Varun Dhawan has made it on his own and b/c audience love his film is completely untrue. When his films are released - audience isn't offered anything other than what's being played. We go see movies to socialize with our friends, family, etc, when we go see films we don't go see them b/c it has Varun, b/c that's the only thing playing in the theater. For example, when there are multiple films played at once - the audience has more choices, if you only have a choice between Varun Dhawan film or nothing - they you're forced to see Varun Dhawan's film. Varun Dhawan should thank his lucky stars that he's getting roles b/c of his father or else he wouldn't last a day in this industry.

Humpty Sharma released two weeks after Ek Villain and 2 weeks before Kick, Dishoom released after Sultan and 2 weeks before Rustom Mohanjudaro, Badrinath had a clash with Kong Skull island, Beauty and the Beast and Rajkumar Rao's Trapped released a week after, Newton Bhoomi Chef released around Judwaa so AUDIENCE had plenty of choices before and after his release. They chose him lol. I don't know about you but I'll never go out with my friends and spend 1000 rupees everytime just to socialise when Varun Dhawan movie is releasing. And do you want him to clash his movies with likes of khans or anyone so that people have choices? And there is no need of him to thank his lucky stars. Since you're talking about his Dad here's 2 cents on that, he was against of him doing Badlapur but he still went ahead and did it not only it was boxoffice succes but got critical acclaim too. Judwaa 2 prolonged his fathers ailing career since his movies flopped really badly before that. Working with Shoojit next and then a YRF's next. Spotless box office record working with different banners what else can he do prove naysayers wrong?Edited by StevieG - 6 years ago
Dilwali89 thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
It's an age old debate. The history has proved that non Bollywood family actors have ruled the box office.
AppleBlossom thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: ranikaadi

Forced might be an abstract concept, but saying Varun Dhawan has made it on his own and b/c audience love his film is completely untrue. When his films are released - audience isn't offered anything other than what's being played. We go see movies to socialize with our friends, family, etc, when we go see films we don't go see them b/c it has Varun, b/c that's the only thing playing in the theater. For example, when there are multiple films played at once - the audience has more choices, if you only have a choice between Varun Dhawan film or nothing - they you're forced to see Varun Dhawan's film. Varun Dhawan should thank his lucky stars that he's getting roles b/c of his father or else he wouldn't last a day in this industry. 

All it would take is one look at the box office results in the past two years for this bizarre argument to completely fall on its face. The audience are outright rejecting movies left, right, and centre. It has become a rarity for a film to cross the 30 crore these days, look at Ittefaq's economics. Barring Hindi Medium, none of the small time hits like BKB, SMS, Newton even crossed the 50 crore mark. That's the reality of the audience going to the cinemas these days: they hardly are. Dhawan should be considered very lucky indeed if the audience decides to socialize with their friends, family etc exclusively for his movies...
Varun Dhawan should thank his stars he got the priced opportunity in this industry because of his father. That's about it.
Bazigar thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: StevieG

can you please give me few examples of movies which were hit because of promotions? Even Salman's and Srk's movies are flopping due to subpar content. Kjo's SHANDAAR(star kids) was promoted heavily Baar Baar Dekho (outsiders) was well packaged with killer songs but both flopped. All this money spent on PR gimmicks might get them 100's of articles but not a 100 crores film.


They spend nearly 25% cost of high budget movie on PR/ad added to this Star have own PR . Which was not the case earlier where content and acting play a major role.   It propel any mediocre star kid actors to give few hit and few miss , with own PR and media communication they can maintain their star status. As u said srk salman may give few flops still their flop movies audience footfall is at par hit of these star kids. With nepotism audience have to choose from few option where movies dont have any repeat value and all these star kids hardly able to replace old actors with superb performance even after acting in movies for a decade. 
Edited by Bazigar - 6 years ago
Chudailpaapi thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Justmoi

We've all said the same, audience makes the star. Thank goodness for that..

But opportunities are what we are talking here. Today Ranbir would be a has been if he did not have the Kapoor name based on his BO record. Abhishek, a thing of the past.

While outsiders face casting couches and insiders are handed jobs nepotism does exist.



And yet Akshay kumar who is real outsider has highest no. of flops and so did AB. Bollywood tries to protect stars as they are assets. It is difficult for audience to do name recall of a star. So once fan base is established they are given chance after chance to prove. Ranbir is still on star ranking after all the flops (sad state of Bollywood but true). These things are important for Bollywood. 😊Edited by Chudailpaapi - 6 years ago