Originally posted by: blue-ice.
u have got be kidding me...even if there was zero nepotism...considering that the competition is fierce and cut throat ...even then there would be casting couch...casting couch doesn't exist because of nepotism...it exists because certain over ambitious people given to the demands of morally corrupt people...
Originally posted by: ranikaadi
It's just stupid to say that David Dhawan's son was accepted by the audience, he was forced upon audience.
can you please give me few examples of movies which were hit because of promotions? Even Salman's and Srk's movies are flopping due to subpar content. Kjo's SHANDAAR(star kids) was promoted heavily Baar Baar Dekho (outsiders) was well packaged with killer songs but both flopped. All this money spent on PR gimmicks might get them 100's of articles but not a 100 crores film.Biggest advantage star kids now hv high expenses on movie promotion and their own PR. Which cover up mediocre acting. With nepotism audience r just getting well packaged promoted star kids that too with very few option to choose form.
Originally posted by: AppleBlossom
Genuine question, HOW? How were the audience forced to spend their hsrd earned money movie after movie on David Dhawan's son?Nepotism exists. Alia, Varun, Ranbir et al were handed opportunities on a platter that a standard outsider gets only after years of struggles and sacrifices. But to deny that some of these star kids have managed to stay because they have what it takes to be here is as silly as denying nepotism itself.
comment:
p_commentcount