ram is helpless!!

Ram is helpless in the hands of society. Sometime i wonder why cant they protect the honor of a woman?? It was a huge injustice with sita in ramayana!! and in mahabharta draupati was disrobed in rajyasabha!! why did men of those era behave soo strange They were weak i guess. They could see a woman disrobe but not back on their words! they could send a helpless woamn to forest but couldnt face the society. It is very shameful!! No wonder in our society woman have been fighting for their rights. I wish sita would have refused agni praksha, i wish rama would have taken a stand for his wife. I wish men in rajya sabha would have stood with draupati and protected her. i wish things would have been changed had these men taken a stand !!!

You just mention one side of story.yes injustice was done to sita and draupadi but ppl only narrate injustic and insult .what was the consequence after this happen should also be mentioned. draupdai cheerharan triggered the destruction of whole kuru wansh which was impossible. but sin of insulting an woman made even invincible drona karna and bhisma ruin in dust.no matter how much they were powerful they had to pay for their sins.pandavas too had to bear the responsibility of wronging draupadi by continuous struggle and repentance. Duryodhan who told draupadi to sit on his thigh got died because of his broken thigh.dushashana who tried to disrobe draupadi met cruellest death.

@ loveispure 👏
@ami to understand ram first Ramayan can't just be for entertainment if am not mistaken u had said that in willina di's thread. So let me share what I had learnt from this forum. About draupdi loveispure had explained well. The whole Bharat paid for the silence the men held in Sabha. The pandavas followed the so called rajdharm but that was not right and that's why they take up exile. They understood true dharm only later.
And coming to ram weak in the society I disagree Infact he exposed how weak the Smrithi in ayodha was. From shanta to Sita he delivers justice. He takes a stand for Sita but indirectly he vindicates her and removes even wrong perceptions about her. Sitas agnipariksha is not a sign of weakness. Ram did face the society head on exposing it vindicating Sita. Right choice is tough and he was ready to let go rajya for Sita but realised with the same power he can prove her purity. Ram become Maryada purushottam only because of Sita. Rajdharm had to be above personal good and as a raja and Pati he did what was expected out of him. Emotionally and mentally he was the Shakthi for Sita in her second exile. The golden effigy of Sita proves that ram had not bowed to the weak society that existed.

Check this link on why her AP is not actually weakness

http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4709814

And these words of shruthiravi Di pls read
( Di hope u don't mind but this will provide clarity to her questions)
But if you sit and analyze the intend of actions you will know how profound Ram and Krishna is. If you see Ram and Krishna applies gender neutral rules. Yes Sita does AP. But Ram also remains the same . Even he can take AP and come out of it unscathed as there is no other woman in his life other than Sita.

Krishna has multiple wives as the situation demanded it. But he respects Panchali who has multiple husbands.
It is not like present day society where rules are applied different to men and woman. Same gender rules is what differentiate them and what made them great
Credit to: shruthiravi

I'm very happy reading all your post which is very sensitive and mature . hope our society also think in these way.

@ Shivam Bhai agreed. Ram suffered as much as Sita but he did his duties as King and didn't make sitas sacrifice useless. That is a trait of how strong the maryada Purushottam was in terms of his emotions conquering him.

Originally posted by: Cluny123

@ Shivam Bhai agreed. Ram suffered as much as Sita but he did his duties as King and didn't make sitas sacrifice useless. That is a trait of how strong the maryada Purushottam was in terms of his emotions conquering him.

I understand everybody"s point of view. ! but i dont read between the lines. Everybody is trying trying find a reason !! reason for injustice- reason for disrobing drapuati!! reason for sita"s banwaas! and reason for her leaving Ram in the end!! It doesnt matter what the consequences were !! They got punished or not!! but why not stop the crime before its being committed!!

Sorry if i my views have hurt anybodys feelings. This is certainly not my intention.