SKR-Of loops and symbolisms#5: Hard way and Smart Way : P.88 - Page 25

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

67.4k

Users

34

Likes

3.2k

Frequent Posters

1087354 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Sumi-19



Dear , when lakshman gave up his life for the sake of Ayodhya , ram was fully shattered and filled with guilt of losing his dearest brother .
See , when Sita died, ram not gave up his life because he knew that lakshman is still with him as a strong support but when lakshman died , he too gave up his life because he wasn't able to bear the separation from his brother.
And if anyone loves u very much and can do anything for your sake , it is very difficult to overcome the pain of getting separated from them , same was with ram and lakshman ,ram couldn't able to live more without lakshman because the love that lakshman had given to Ram was beyond explanation and ram ends his life reuniting with Sita and lakshman as lakshmi and shesh naag in divine aspect.


The order in which everyone gave up their lives is symbolical too. 😆

First Lakshmi went, then Shesh Naag, and then Shank, Chakra, and Narayan. It shows that support is the most important thing.

Even in the Mahabharat, Krishna supported the Pandavas, while the Narayani sena supported the Kauravas. But, the Pandavas won. Because the had the support of Krishna, and the Narayani sena didn't support them from the heart- they were only following orders.
Shivam... thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: shabari14


Because he had already left their kingdom for Ram's side, so they thought that he was cheating them again.

And, in some places, they say that Mandodari married Vibhishan, like Tara married Sugreev. Why did that happen?



Mandodari married on insistence of Rama , when he told her it will be for welfare of Lanka.

There is even a story of Lanka after raavan's death , where shukracharya in anger against vibhishan , sent demon mundkasur and demoness Virupa to kill him , but lord Hanuman saved him.


Regarding sugreev marrying Tara , u wouldnt want to listen to real story .😆 , its not a healthy one
RadhaKrishna_19 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
Aur kabhi kabhi yahan ke kuch analysis aise hote hai jo mere samajh ke ekdam bahar hote hai !! 😆 KABHI KABHI KITNA MATURE HO JAATE HO TUM SAB !! 😆
Shivam... thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: shabari14


Was she called Rajmata? That doesn't make any sense, Bhaiya!

Why doesnt it Make Sense😕😕

Tag of RajMata doesnt meant that the lady who dons this title has to be the mother of the king always.


It can always be the wfe of the king , the mother of the king , or even the most senior and respected lady of the royal family , to whom no memeber of royal family can refuse


Bheeshma commanded sort of the same respect , he wasnt the father of drutrashtra , but still was the most powerful and respected man of hastinapur , even though not the king himself , still even the king couldnt disobey his command
Edited by Shivam... - 9 years ago
1087354 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Sumi-19

Aur kabhi kabhi yahan ke kuch analysis aise hote hai jo mere samajh ke ekdam bahar hote hai !! 😆 KABHI KABHI KITNA MATURE HO JAATE HO TUM SAB !! 😆


Kaunse analyses? Aur kabhi kabhi hum bhi bacche hojate hai!
1087354 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: Shivam...

Why doesnt it Make Sense😕😕

Tag of RajMata doesnt meant that the lady who dons this title has to be the mother of the king always.


It can always be the wfe of the king , the mother of the king , or even the most elederly and respected lady of the royal family..


That makes sense now! Thanks Bhaiya! And why wouldn't I want to hear the story, just tell me, na!
Edited by shabari14 - 9 years ago
Shivam... thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: shabari14


That makes sense now! Thanks Bhaiya! And why wouldn't I want to hear the story, just tell me, na!



Like Mandodari , same was the case with Tara
Shivam... thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
Because the story is not a pleasant one to know😆
1087354 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
15 August 2016

Today, Sulochana's father did the "Vardaan" by giving Meghnad's head back to Sulochana, just like he had done the "Kanyadaan" during Meghnad and Sulochana's wedding. Both the bride and Meghnad's head need to be there for the fire of life. But, only Meghnad's head needs to be given fro his final rites, while the bride needs to be given for the marriage. To destroy a blind Sanskriti, the mentality needs to be given up, then only it will truly be destroyed. That is why the final rites can not happen without the head, and Sulochana goes to get it from Lakshman. But, to create, Prakriti needs to give her whole, emotionally and physically. To have a child, only giving birth to it isn't enough, you need to be emotionally present and give it all of the love. Devaki's six sons were killed as soon as they were born, for Devaki was not emotionally capable of raising her children at that time. Then, Prakriti, in the form of Yogamaya and Rohini, gave up her mortal life to save Krishna and wanted to have a child, and was given Balarama. Both children got people who raised them with all the love possible. Why is only one person burned in the pyre, while two people are needed to take the seven vows? Because the base of every life is two people, but the base of every destruction is one person.

Sita and Lakshman are both sitting by a lake, in thought. The lake near Sita has a waterfall with clear water flowing in it, while Lakshman's lake is still and murky. Why is the water in the waterfall clean? Because the fast moving water doesn't allow dirt and murk to sit on the bottom and build its way up. Like that, we should always have a stream of clean and beautiful thoughts, if not continuous, atleast only good thoughts. Then only the lotuses of good action will be able to bloom. Our mind should not be filled with bad thoughts only, like Lakshman's was. He was thinking about the vadh of Meghnad and Ravan over and over again. The same thoughts if repeated over and over again, then your mind will not be able to function right and will just stay still. No actions will take place and the mind will be empty and worthless over time. So, work the muscle of the brain, but with only good methods. Then only will the body be in good health.

The theme of this episode is refusing. Sulochana refuses Ravan's request to let him touch Meghnad's body, and goes to the battlefield, even after everyone is against it. Lakshman refuses to part with Meghnad's head, but after Sita convinces him, he returns it to Sulochana. Ravan refuses to turn back, and says that the sanyasi's heads will be Meghnad's tribute. Refusing to take poison makes sense, but we humans refuse to part with it. Ravan, Sulochana, and Lakshman refuse to part with the poison of their hatred. But, Sita tries to explain Lakshman that a man's deeds die with him. So, can't we say that every day is a day to forget? Every day counts as a new life, a period of new possibilities, so every day should be started anew. Forget the happenings of the previous day and work towards improving yourself, not your mistakes. Give away the poison for amrit, and see how heaven is brought down to Earth.
Edited by shabari14 - 9 years ago
RadhaKrishna_19 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
Iam thinking to write an Ram - Lakshman OS and the plot will how lakshman died. Anyone interested to read it ?? 😳
Oh god , my craziness for ram lakshman is beyond explanation !! 😆 🤪 ❤️

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".