looking at the CVs - Page 42

Iss thread mein aisa Hai kya?😆

Originally posted by: FruitToasty

No, They are discussing what's being presented in the show. They are trying to understand Nandini's character .

Coming to the point, I think Mauli helped Nandini more than Kunal helped her, when Nandini lost her baby (I guess the biggest pain of her life) Mauli spent whole night with her, consoling her but Nandini is a woman who doesn't appreciate women, she is more inclined towards men, so next morning Kunal comes with a tea and flowers and Nandini thinks about how her marriage was bad and how Kunal is a wonderful man... Here Mauli spent whole night with her but Nandini did not think what it would have been like to have that support and love in her life, Kunal brought tea in the morning and she went high on the feels for him thinking what it would be like to have Kunal as husband so basically Nandini would have been grateful to Mauli if she was a man.

When Kunal bought her the flower, I think she was surprised that a man can give a women a flower and embarrassed too. She only took the flower on Mauli's prompting. When she saw them fooling around , her thoughts were again surprise that marriage can be this way too, I.e. fun filled, with talk, with respect etc. because she had seen only two marriages, one of her parents where they spoke only six word like tea, food etc and then her own.

I only started seeing Kunal as someone else other than Mauli's husband was at the temple after the Baba scene.

@Pamk06
Nandini is not a cave woman, I have not seen domestic violence in real life doesn't mean I'll be surprised if I see it in future, if Nandini didn't witness it with Rajdeep doesn't mean she didn't witness it anywhere, take Kunal and Nandini for example, weren't they all lovey dovey in the Cafe, how many couples Nandini would have seen in a Cafe or in a movie or on television? It is ridiculous that she didn't know that men give women flowers, wasn't she the beauty of her school, she had men like Manas in love with her, we do celebrate valentine's and rose day, isn't there a possibility that someone gave her a rose? Nandini is from Lucknow, can we stop treating her like a child who has seen nothing and Kunal is the first person she saw after opening her eyes?

About good marriages, I bet none acts like Rajdeep in real life, people who abuse their wife put on act of being good in front of the world, Nandini was forced by Rajdeep to meet many of his friends and their wives so am I to believe she didn't see the love among those couples? This is absolutely illogical that she's has seen only 2 marriages..Nandini is let's say 25 years old, She did not get married when she was a day old, she was old enough to get married and I bet she experienced many things before marriage and she did not have a memory loss so how come she has witnessed only two marriages, Mauli's father is not an abusive man, he puts up with nonsense of Mauli's mother, did not Nandini witness that? Or her neighbors or Mauli's neighbors?


If you ask someone what will you take from Mauli? I bet "Mauli's husband" wouldn't even be an option because there is so much more to her, Nandini could have envied Mauli's success, she could have seen herself as a strong today's woman like Mauli but what she envied was her husband and what she wanted was her wedding life..

I apologise for butting in. I couldn't help but notice. What an absolutely BS theory.

Originally posted by: pamk06

Question :

Knowing CVs penchant for festivals, Do you guys think Cvs are heading towards Dussehera. Its celebrated on the 10th day of Navratri which they are celebrating currently and Its a festival that celebrates the win of good over bad, the right over the wrong. So going with that, as Kunal and Nandini relationship is wrong as per the society, will it be destroyed on that day and will Mauli get justice and she will start her new journey.

Originally posted by: FruitToasty

@Pamk06
Nandini is not a cave woman, I have not seen domestic violence in real life doesn't mean I'll be surprised if I see it in future, if Nandini didn't witness it with Rajdeep doesn't mean she didn't witness it anywhere, take Kunal and Nandini for example, weren't they all lovey dovey in the Cafe, how many couples Nandini would have seen in a Cafe or in a movie or on television? It is ridiculous that she didn't know that men give women flowers, wasn't she the beauty of her school, she had men like Manas in love with her, we do celebrate valentine's and rose day, isn't there a possibility that someone gave her a rose? Nandini is from Lucknow, can we stop treating her like a child who has seen nothing and Kunal is the first person she saw after opening her eyes?

About good marriages, I bet none acts like Rajdeep in real life, people who abuse their wife put on act of being good in front of the world, Nandini was forced by Rajdeep to meet many of his friends and their wives so am I to believe she didn't see the love among those couples? This is absolutely illogical that she's has seen only 2 marriages..Nandini is let's say 25 years old, She did not get married when she was a day old, she was old enough to get married and I bet she experienced many things before marriage and she did not have a memory loss so how come she has witnessed only two marriages, Mauli's father is not an abusive man, he puts up with nonsense of Mauli's mother, did not Nandini witness that? Or her neighbors or Mauli's neighbors?


If you ask someone what will you take from Mauli? I bet "Mauli's husband" wouldn't even be an option because there is so much more to her, Nandini could have envied Mauli's success, she could have seen herself as a strong today's woman like Mauli but what she envied was her husband and what she wanted was her wedding life..

I totally agree with you but this is what the CVs have showed us. There is also no denying the fact that there are lot of gaps in the story and reality is different. But this is their story and we have to go with what they telling us to understand the character and their actions. We do not necessarily have to agree with it and there are many parts that I don't but this is not my story. The writing has been loose at many places, nor consistent and hence the main reason for the frustration.

I think nandini witnessed kunal-mauli's marriage closely which wouldn't have been the case with rajdeep's business friends and colleagues' marriages,perhaps rajdeep never did allow or let her to get so close to his business friends or their wives,perhaps nandini never tried to get close to them either.I think it is completely possible that she didn't witness mauli's parents' marriage closely either,it does happen that you are very good friends with someone but don't know much about their family dynamics.Even if you are not a babe in the woods sometimes things really could surprise you in later years of your life,in theory I know husbands like kunal exist but since I too have been brought up in a family confirming to traditional gender roles I too could be at least a bit surprised(or at least think about it as it wouldn't be completely old to me) if I witnessed someone like kunal and a marriage like kunal-mauli's up close and personally.

Originally posted by: pamk06

Question :

Knowing CVs penchant for festivals, Do you guys think Cvs are heading towards Dussehera. Its celebrated on the 10th day of Navratri which they are celebrating currently and Its a festival that celebrates the win of good over bad, the right over the wrong. So going with that, as Kunal and Nandini relationship is wrong as per the society, will it be destroyed on that day and will Mauli get justice and she will start her new journey.

A fesitival track with lots of tension has to culminate into something, like a major revelation. I hope it ends with Dida finding out about how serious Kunal is about Nandini. I think we may finally get to see that "seena thaan ke proclamation" from Kunal. And by the time we get to that scene, I think a lot would have happened and Nandini may even decide to go away. So I am imagining a scene where he bursts out in front of Dida and then running behind Nandini to stop her?? Something like that ..😆

Or we are complicating a very simple thing, Nandini is supposed to be flawed, why look for reasons to see her as flawless?

If Nandini witnessed only bad marriages and for the first time she saw a marriage which wasn't bad but doesn't Kunal's love for her shatter the image of a good wedding? How easy it was for Kunal to forget everything he had for Mauli in matter of a month, if it was about not seeing good marriage, Kunal and Mauli's marriage isn't exactly good and the problem is not Mauli, it's Kunal so why would Nandini fall for a bad husband?

Or she just picks men over women, she picked Rajdeep over Mauli now she picked Kunal over Mauli, the problem isn't that kunal was a bad husband because that's not even a thing, Kunal is good to Nandini, if Kunal had cheated on Mauli with nurse in his office, on whose side do you think Nandini would have been? Mauli's right? Now Kunal cheated on Mauli but he cheated on her with Nandini, so she doesn't care, that's the flaw

Don't we all live with people? Nandini is not mogli, your interpretation would have been apt for mogli, a woman, who was brought from jungle and married one man who beat her and kept her in isolation then she witnessed Maunal

I don't think writer is trying to say that or this is even a gap, it's crystal clear that Nandini is a flawed character

Originally posted by: TheSmurfs

I apologise for butting in. I couldn't help but notice. What an absolutely BS theory.

So for Nandini , Mauli had turned to just an acquaintance after 7 years of abuse. hence this no remorse syndrome.

Arey kisi stranger ke liye bhi sorry feel karte hain, if we knowingly unknowingly cause them inconvenience.

Again I apologise for interfering in the conversation as I didn't mean to.

But the way Nandini's absolute lack of conscience is justified it just put me off.

As kunal ' mother said , ye beimaani hai, dishonesty hai , aur kuch bhi nahi.

Not a single theory here is a justification. We are merely trying to understand someone's thought process behind doing something. Even a murderer has a motive and a justification inside his head for committing a murder. Trying to understand that, does not amount to justifying it. It is not like one would wake up one day and decide to commit a murder or get into a EMA. There is a thought process behind it, however selfish, cruel or even stupid it might be. Trying to understand that does not amount to acceptance of it.