looking at the CVs - Page 43

I don't think discussions on a character should be necessarily taken as efforts to justify or to deem the said character flawless.Heathcliff is discussed and analysed,the treatment and abuse he suffered at the hands of his love's brother and some of the servants is brought in to analyse his behaviour to them and others after he has grown up,mostly not with the intention to justify him or see him in a positive light but to understand what drove his actions and words.Understanding isn't justifying or agreeing.

Originally posted by: pamk06

Fighting for others and fighting for oneself when you are emotionally raw are two completely different things.

Anyways, I was asking so that Kunal feels shamefaced and guilty. Mauli is not the one who's wrong here.

Originally posted by: FruitToasty

Or we are complicating a very simple thing, Nandini is supposed to be flawed, why look for reasons to see her as flawless?

If Nandini witnessed only bad marriages and for the first time she saw a marriage which wasn't bad but doesn't Kunal's love for her shatter the image of a good wedding? How easy it was for Kunal to forget everything he had for Mauli in matter of a month, if it was about not seeing good marriage, Kunal and Mauli's marriage isn't exactly good and the problem is not Mauli, it's Kunal so why would Nandini fall for a bad husband?

Or she just picks men over women, she picked Rajdeep over Mauli now she picked Kunal over Mauli, the problem isn't that kunal was a bad husband because that's not even a thing, Kunal is good to Nandini, if Kunal had cheated on Mauli with nurse in his office, on whose side do you think Nandini would have been? Mauli's right? Now Kunal cheated on Mauli but he cheated on her with Nandini, so she doesn't care, that's the flaw

Don't we all live with people? Nandini is not mogli, your interpretation would have been apt for mogli, a woman, who was brought from jungle and married one man who beat her and kept her in isolation then she witnessed Maunal

I don't think writer is trying to say that or this is even a gap, it's crystal clear that Nandini is a flawed character

Originally posted by: pamk06

Question :

Knowing CVs penchant for festivals, Do you guys think Cvs are heading towards Dussehera. Its celebrated on the 10th day of Navratri which they are celebrating currently and Its a festival that celebrates the win of good over bad, the right over the wrong. So going with that, as Kunal and Nandini relationship is wrong as per the society, will it be destroyed on that day and will Mauli get justice and she will start her new journey.

Originally posted by: Saazhumsafars

I don't think discussions on a character should be necessarily taken as efforts to justify or to deem the said character flawless.Heathcliff is discussed and analysed,the treatment and abuse he suffered at the hands of his love's brother and some of the servants is brought in to analyse his behaviour to them and others after he has grown up,mostly not with the intention to justify him or see him in a positive light but to understand what drove his actions and words.Understanding isn't justifying or agreeing.

Of course nandini is flawed,she does not ponder deeply upon how wrong kunal turned out to be a husband,she is selfish because she decides he is good because he is good to her and the fact that he did or does not even show basic decency to mauli as a human has no impact on her view of him.I don't think anyone( but 1 or 2 members on the forum) says that she isn't flawed.

Let's agree to disagree on this, when I see Nandini I see a 30 year old woman, I can believe if you'd said that she didn't know "Sex can be good" because obviously the only man in her life was Rajdeep and I can believe that he was her first but I am sorry it is really difficult to believe that you don't see married couple in India, that too in Lucknow, and Nandini has to be a robot not to notice Mauli's father after knowing Mauli for 8 years...


Anyway, moving on I have a question do you think KuNan's love is pretty much on the surface? Someone mentioned they love how they make each other feel but don't love each other individually and I do feel it's easier to love someone but not to like someone..

Nandini keeps saying that kunal is a good man, a good husband but right now she's in a phase where she can't see that the good husband and a good man is hurting his wife, that doesn't equate to a good husband, or she says that because she loves him and when you love someone you make a mental picture of them as a good human? I was going through the Twitter comments about recent allegation on an actor and people were like "He can't do this, he's a nice man, he can never do this" and they don't even know him but they can't picture themselves appreciating or even thinking that they ever liked an actor who could do this..

Secondly, remember when Nandini went to fulfill Dida's mannat amidst natural calamity Kunal had said something like he likes that Nandini is selfless in her actions but now when Dida had a heart attack Nandini doesn't even care, so ideally wouldn't he think how can someone think about such a frivolous thing when someone's life's at stake?

I guess they have built a mental image of each other which is not real or doesn't resonate with their reality, their love for each other makes them opposite of what they liked about each other...
What do you think?

Originally posted by: SummerRain7

A fesitival track with lots of tension has to culminate into something, like a major revelation. I hope it ends with Dida finding out about how serious Kunal is about Nandini. I think we may finally get to see that "seena thaan ke proclamation" from Kunal. And by the time we get to that scene, I think a lot would have happened and Nandini may even decide to go away. So I am imagining a scene where he bursts out in front of Dida and then running behind Nandini to stop her?? Something like that ..😆

But if you look at it from a good Vs bad angle (marriage surviving over EMA) , may be we will see Nandini going away, and Kunal just mute and silent , not really doing anything (as always) making Dida feel her mission has been accomplished. In which case , along with Kunal, Mauli will also get butchered. They both may silently acquiesce to continue staying in the marriage and then, we may get a time leap. But instead of them staying in the marriage, I'd much rather have them separate and then may be a time leap.

I do want the first scenario to play out and based on the OLV's that where they are heading).If Nandini leaves, will Kunal breakdown or will he just take it in stride and move on? (If they go with the breakdown, will Shakti be able to pull it off because this would be his chance to show his acting prowess). Irrespective of whatever happens, I do want Mauli to make a conscious choice either ways and not just flow with it just because of family pressure, or circumstances,etc. (Would be a nice change from other FL's).

Separate would be my choice but then let's see what Mauli decides or rather CVs or Kunal might just surprise us and make the choice himself (Highly doubt though)

Originally posted by: mango_pudding1

@bold 🤣

if it does happen, then we might get a leap as per rumours? certainly many of us here would cheer on a new track of a new journey. there is only so much of broken mauli we can watch...

I am so ready for the new track. This has been dragging and my patience is running out especially seeing Dida's ways Of fixing marriage. I thought this Monday would be the day but they are going to drag it for one more week and this week with broken Mauli we have an added bonus of broken Nandini. 😆 Hopefulky broken Kunal at the end and not confused Kunal 😆 😆

Pamk06- No more confused Kunal please 🤔

Originally posted by: WhyHate

You put across a good argument for Nandini, but somewhere I feel that whatever Kunal did, Mauli could have done as well. Now I haven't watched from the beginning so I don't know about all the scenes you're talking about, but let's say for example the suicide scene.

When Nandini decided to commit suicide, if Mauli had been there, I'm sure she would have talked Nandini out of it as well. Your argument only holds true in this case because Kunal was there. What if Mauli had seen Nandini run out to commit suicide. She would have gone after her and convinced her otherwise.

With Nandini's blouse unzipping, I feel that this is one place where sometimes a woman doesn't know what to do. If you think about it, when say your bra strap is showing, a gentleman usually ignores it, but a woman points it out. If your neckline is deep, a gentleman will mostly ignore it, but a woman will point that out. Similarly, if your blouse or dress or skirt is about to unzip, a gentleman will try to help you out, but a woman might be at a loss as to what to do. It happened with a friend of mine. We were at a party and the dress she was wearing was tied in the back and that's the only thing that was holding the top part of the dress up. Now she used to wear that dress often, so the threads had begun to wear and that day they finally snapped. One of our common male friends standing behind her caught the threads before they fell and helped her into another room where she changed. I was also standing behind her, but I was actually at a loss what to do. I saw the thread coming undone and my first reaction was to tell her. If I had done that it would have been too late because by then the thread would have given away and she would have been exposed.

Also somewhere it has to do with the character of each. Mauli is a more practical person. Look at the way she is dealing with this EMA. She had an emotional breakdown, but now she's practical. Kunal isn't mine anymore, he doesn't love me, so divorce him. Okay we have to live together for a month, but I won't question him and in fact I'll help him meet his love. That's Mauli. Practical thinking. Kunal is more emotional thinking. He didn't tell Mauli about his love for Nandini because he didn't want to hurt her. He feels hurt seeing Mauli in pain, but he isn't feeling guilty. He came back on Dida's say-so because emotions count. Let's reverse the EMA situation. If Mauli had fallen in love with someone else, she would have told Kunal because it makes sense practically.

Now, let's say all your arguments are correct to this point. It makes sense that Nandini fell for Kunal and Kunal fell for Nandini. But did neither of them think for a second of all the people they would be causing pain to? I don't mean just Mauli. I mean Yamini, Dida, themselves, Nandini's family. Did they seriously think engaging in EMA was better than just divorcing and then getting married? When they first had sex, Nandini had just gone through trauma. And she started pulling Kunal towards her. Is that really the only thing Nandini could think of? Both of their arguments are that they couldn't control themselves, things just happened. Things don't just happen. We take steps towards them. We can take steps away from them as well. Nandini and Kunal could have controlled themselves. When Nandini made a move to leave, Kunal could have let her go. When Kunal tried to come close to her, Nandini could have stopped him. When Mauli would phone and ask Nandini where she was, she could have realized that she was lying and cheating her best friend and stopped herself. But they didn't.

@Bold- You're right that Mauli would have done the same exact thing but the fact remains that it was Kunal who was there when Mauli was not able to. And like @Pam said, Kunal happened to be in a lot of places where Nandani needed support. However, having a supportive friend or being there for someone you care about should not ever result in the kind of betrayal made by the two.