New article : Saraswatichandra | Not a love story

radix thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#1

Link to article

http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/JLEYRaHV7KJgbDyUTWarKJ/Saraswatichandra--Not-a-love-story.html

Why Sanjay Leela Bhansali's version of the Gujarati literary classic 'Saraswatichandra' misses the point Salil Tripathi

Saraswatichandra by Govardhanram Tripathi inspired a TV series (above) and a film.

Saraswatichandra by Govardhanram Tripathi inspired a TV series (above) and a film.

I grew up in a home where Saraswatichandra was considered "our" book, part of our heritage, because its author, Govardhanram Tripathi, was my grandfather's uncle.

His portrait hung in my parents' room. Mentored by his uncle Manahsukhram Tripathi (my great-great-grandfather and himself a scholar and writer), Govardhanram was a skilled lawyer who represented Gujarat's princely states and helped set up the law publisher, NM Tripathi Pvt. Ltd, in Kalbadevi in Bombay (now Mumbai), which his brother Narbheram managed, and where several of my uncles were to work over the years. But writing was his true calling; he wrote Saraswatichandra between 1887 and 1902. He died in 1907, at 52.

When Govind Saraiya made the eponymous film in 1968, he invited the Tripathi clan to see the film on its opening night, and dozens of us dutifully made our way to the Opera House theatre. It was a difficult film to make'Saraswatichandra is really about a man's quest to understand his place in society, about challenging orthodox mores, where ideas matter and the plot is secondary'and it isn't surprising that people know the film more for Kalyanji-Anandji's music than its story.

photoA scene from the movie, 'Saraswatichandra'.

I remember my mother humming the songs,Chandan sa badan and Chhod de saari duniya kisi ke liye, for years. She wanted the novel translated, so that more people beyond Gujarat would take joy from what she considered to be one of the finest works about 19th century India. When others would point out Saratchandra Chattopadhyaya's worthy Bengali novels, Devdas, Biraj Bou andParineeta, as examples of modernity in Indian fiction, she would quietly point out that the last volume of Saraswatichandra was published a dozen years before Parineeta(1914).

Saraswatichandra became a burden for some of us. Taken together, the four volumes take up over 2,000 pages, and as my grandfather used to joke, the breadth of its fourth volume was the same as its height. But it was a metaphorical burden too, for when my essays at our Gujarati-medium school weren't up to the mark, one of my teachers scolded me: "You are Govardhanram's descendant'how can your writing be so shabby?"

Intimidating size and teachers apart, once I made an effort, I found a complex narrative that was less about what happens to whom and when'and more about the characters' thoughts. The Gujarati writerPrabodh Parikh reminds me that Tripathi was a writer first, novelist later. He had deliberately chosen the medium of novel because of its popularity to express his ideas of a Plato-like Republic, where the privileged have obligations. "His concern was to write about the plight of the country, its inequality, while exploring one's soul," Parikh says.

At heart, the novel is about how an aristocrat senses the injustice around him and feels he must do something about it, even while suppressing personal desires. Tradition and society impose burden and expectations; the individual realizes the limits of individual freedom in a circumscribed universe. The novel was about the world as it is, and not as we wish it to be; where the universe is imperfect, not a fairy tale; where loose ends don't get tied, and you can't return to the forks left behind and attempt to walk the road not taken this time. It was about an India struggling to cope with modernity, with enlightened values seeping into the psyche, questioning foundational beliefs without uprooting the architecture. Saraiya's 2-hour film was an attempt to squeeze the universe into a ball.

photoGovardhanram Tripathi.

If the novel has over 2,000 pages, Sanjay Leela Bhansali has promised 2,000 episodes in his serial Saraswatichandra, now enjoying high ratings on Star Plus. But don't expect him to tackle the novel's profound philosophical questions. He has to keep the new generation engrossed. The characters have names from the novel and that's it. The millions who will see this act of cultural vandalism will confuse this bowdlerized version with the real thing. Academic Tridip Suhrud, who has written an intellectual biography of Govardhanram and who is translating Saraswatichandra into English, told me: "The present makers of Saraswatichandrainterpret it primarily as a love story, thereby reducing its grandeur and civilizational sweep. If it were only a love story, it could not have shaped the moral universe of the newly emerging middle class over a century ago."

Bhansali has added sub-plots, twists and turns, stripping nuances off each character, turning multidimensional individuals into smartly-attired cardboard cutouts. The plot shifts between that ultimate artificial city'Dubai'and a village that doesn't exist even in Gujarat Tourism ads. Columnist Urvish Kothari wrote in Gujarat Samachar: "Isn't it criminal for a director, who worships only excess, to destroy the essence of the original and reduce it to a run-of-the-mill love story?"

If Govardhanram's Saraswatichandra was a brooding man who had written books, Bhansali's hero is a Marlboro man busy showing off his taut muscles and throbbing veins. A body-building, sky-diving hunk, this Saraswatichandra mistakes arrogance for confidence. The quiet dignity of Kumudsundari makes way for demure blushes and shy glances; here she looks like a Gurjari model, displaying see-through saris and lavish cholis.

To be sure, you can reinterpret classics. Just think of Shakespeare'and what Akira Kurosawa, Kenneth Branagh, and closer home, Vishal Bhardwaj, have done to the Bard. Or think of Shyam Benegalretelling the Mahabharat as Kalyug. But Bhansali's interest is not to reinterpret it, but to monetize it. He isn't interested in the idea, but the image; not the mind, but the body.

I have no idea what Bhansali will make of Saraswatichandra's ultimate dream'Kalyan Gram, a model village where the aristocracy served the downtrodden'but I dare not predict. Maybe by then, Bhansali's Gujarat will be so vibrant there will not be any poverty to eradicate, and Kalyan Gram will be a gym.

Created

Last reply

Replies

26

Views

6.6k

Users

21

Likes

194

Frequent Posters

Nkapoor3 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#2
How frikin funny is this!? The show has just started! It is not a movie! They cannot start with a love story from the word go!
Marybarton thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 12 years ago
#3
A scathing review that will really hurt SLB, particularly because it comes from a member of the writer's family. But, remember that he never promised to stay true to the book and the book is a classic - therefore, well past any copyright talks about authenticity. The Bard/Shakespeare was not only adapted and reinterpreted, over the ages it has been trashed and made into children's plays. The classic doesn't get soiled, so we need to give SLB the right. Afterall, his show is what made this review even possible. People are talking about Saraswatichandra the book. As the writer here said, the long-forgotten book. SLB has already done a great service by reintroducing it to the masses. Isn't that something?

The writer should have thanked SLB at least once even while criticizing the presentation of the book. But all he does is get on a high horse to complain with the benefit of his last name how SLB didn't get it right. This show has had too many scathing reviews because the expectations are so high while other new joke shows are getting flippy good reviews. Be fair!

The hero of the show may be beautiful for TRP generating reasons, but he is not portraying an arrogant character. None of the viewers saw him as arrogant. Neither is Kumud just a model. This is not an art film, it is a soap opera. Of course things will be reduced to the basics! Beautiful counts and so does drama. Be a little gracious and appreciate that SLB respected Saraswatichandra the book and gave it a new life. It is a canonical work, it can't be soiled by what you find is a bad imitation. So why take offense?

Edited by Marybarton - 12 years ago
HakunaMatata. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 12 years ago
#4
Whats the prblm with this guy?? 😕

To keep the today's audience engrossed and fetch the reuquired TRP to keep the serial running, modernization of characters and story was required.

I dont think ppl would be dat interested in watching just a story of a man eradicating the poverty of some place. Thats fine but some love story nd twists are also necessary to keep the TV junta hooked.

M really happy with watever SLB is showing us rite now. If it continues this way m sure it will climb the TRP ladder further.

Ppl r just adamant to bring a good show down. *sigh*


cherrypansy thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#5
I would say SLB has been asked to rewrite the novel SC as per current times. No one can take away the significance of the initial version, still would say that it holds appreciation only among historians and other intellectuals as the society has changed, there are problems but unlike those which wherein the 19 century.
MistyDawn thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#6
Marybarton said pretty much everything I wanted to say..All of us here in the forum and many more sitting at home watching the show would never have known about Govardhan Tripathi and his contribution to literature, had this man Sanjay Leela Bhansali not decided to bring it to the masses through television. There will be only handful of people if any at all, who would actually go to library and read the original novel..spend even 1 day reading it..a novel that took 14 years to complete..Replicating classical books page by page onscreen is not difficult..its impossible. The piece of work he has picked to show onscreen is not an easy one.. Its easy to criticise what we see onscreen.. Hard to understand the amount of work that goes behind conceptualising it..Reading and grasping the essence of the novel, summarising it, understanding the nuances of each and every character, adapting it to suit modern times, keeping the basic essence intact and on top of all this packaging the whole product to appeal the viewers, is a mammoth job..I can not even begin to imagine how much hard work has gone behind it by the creative team who researched and worked on it for a whole year before they shot the first scene..My heartiest congratulations to the team for pulling this up so nicely so far..Criticism is good but acknowledgement of sincere effort where it is due is also very important.
Edited by vaishali-AR - 12 years ago
mandygill thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#7
SLB said that it is not exact copy of the book, he made changes in the script in keeping with modernization! then what is this fuss about!
jyothi- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#8
SLB is a g8 director he know how to make audience happy all his films have done well in Box office.Films r 3 hrs show where as tv shows r more than 3000 hrs show so he knows how to take the story further he also knows the trp race in television industry.
He will change the story and there will be romance between Samud.As of now let us enjoy the show.
Edited by jyothi-m - 12 years ago
smrth thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#9
Well, the book is already a classic and it may not be aiming for any further recognition or acclaim. It's place in its native language is secured, not only for ideas it presented, but also for the virtuoso presentation of language. There may be some truth in criticism for present dilution or certain cliches.
But for once, it has never satisfactorily addressed its end. For an average reader like me or for generations that went before me, it always remained loose and so purposeless, it took away some of the charm from it. Even author had never been convincing why he had not chosen the obvious where almost all characters were ready and amenable to the desired end, even in face of orthodoxy. In fact, if author was at all showing up a reformist vein and an idealistic persuasion like 'Kalyan gram', then his very retreat under the face of that time's orthodoxy had diminished not only his own goal, it has taken away much from the idea. The agent (SC) himself was bogged down so downcast, till end he was not showed reconciled. Sc's end was glaringly loose one- defying entire plot or build up and generations have complained its inadequacy. So SBL has every right to pursue one version where a logical closure does happen.
Plus, 19th century orthodoxy is now so obsolete and redundant, it will not hold the end, (which was not able to hold it truly even then). Here, if the author of the article is trying to defend it as ' the novel was about the world as it was' then he may not also advance an argument in the same breath that author was attempting an 'idealistic' Kalyangram and such ideals. Widow's remarriage was not entirely taboo even then. In fact, in today's society, its denial is taboo or redundant and OUTDATED. So a true closure must happen. That alone can correct the ONE defect in the classic.

Edited by smrth - 12 years ago
AR1220 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#10
This review is kind of harsh. I live in America and I can guarantee you that I would have never known about this novel unless SLB had decided to make a show about it. Yes, I understand that the family member is upset that the show doesn't show every small little lesson of the novel, but they also need to realize that it is very hard to depict every small detail like that.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".