New article : Saraswatichandra | Not a love story - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

26

Views

6.6k

Users

21

Likes

194

Frequent Posters

neha-2 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Marybarton

A scathing review that will really hurt SLB, particularly because it comes from a member of the writer's family. But, remember that he never promised to stay true to the book and the book is a classic - therefore, well past any copyright talks about authenticity. The Bard/Shakespeare was not only adapted and reinterpreted, over the ages it has been trashed and made into children's plays. The classic doesn't get soiled, so we need to give SLB the right. Afterall, his show is what made this review even possible. People are talking about Saraswatichandra the book. As the writer here said, the long-forgotten book. SLB has already done a great service by reintroducing it to the masses. Isn't that something?

The writer should have thanked SLB at least once even while criticizing the presentation of the book. But all he does is get on a high horse to complain with the benefit of his last name how SLB didn't get it right. This show has had too many scathing reviews because the expectations are so high while other new joke shows are getting flippy good reviews. Be fair!

The hero of the show may be beautiful for TRP generating reasons, but he is not portraying an arrogant character. None of the viewers saw him as arrogant. Neither is Kumud just a model. This is not an art film, it is a soap opera. Of course things will be reduced to the basics! Beautiful counts and so does drama. Be a little gracious and appreciate that SLB respected Saraswatichandra the book and gave it a new life. It is a canonical work, it can't be soiled by what you find is a bad imitation. So why take offense?



👍🏼
-ParamHolic- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#12
2,ooo episodes chahiye na...Then yeh sab toh zayas hai..
This is guy mad...
I really dont get this...the generation in which they lived is gone now...N if SLB shows the same thing like in movie..toh shayad..The serial would have been in losses...
go Man..get some brain n then talk..
neha-2 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#13
this guy has no brains 🤢

whatever slb is doin ..is correct

btw tfs😊
Edited by neha-2 - 12 years ago
Jjoshim thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#14
I agree with the writer of the blog! SALIL Tripathi. All those saying they had never heard of the novel earlier, I would humbly say, if you had not heard that does not mean no one had heard. Romeo and Juliet was a novel , it didn't come in lime light after the movie on it, but was a classic it self. Shakespeare will remain a genius, even if we make movies on his work or not. Same way the author of saraswatichandra novel too was a great writer, immaterial whether a movie or serial is made on it or not.

So to imply SLB is doing some favour to author by bringing the novel to limelight may not be entirely true.

The author of the blog is not trying to demean SLB or his creation, but since SLB has chosen to call his work as inspired by the novel, he is just trying to draw parallels between the two.

So true the novel was about the quest of the individual, which comes forth in the novel again and again in for of his inner turmoils.

In serial the only turmoil we have seen till now is of Saraswatichandra fighting the demon of his past and his affection for his lost mother.

Till now what we are seeing is only built up by some realistic some unrealistic events, of a romantic linkage. The era is different so the shyness of kumudsundari or the subtle hints of love have been replaced keeping in track with the newer times.

But serial is yet to move towards some central message, which it will follow through out ( like it was quest for saraswatichandra in the novel to find himself.

I think instead of jumping the gun to the person who may not like the serial as much as you, or may have a different view, we must encourage such fruitful discussions on the forum.

It's not he is doing it for sake of it, he is just presenting his view point, the same way Mary is rightly saying that this is soap opera and not the novel. But he is just trying to link the soul novel had to the soul serial is having, just to draw parallel.
Edited by Jjoshim - 12 years ago
Nkapoor3 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: Jjoshim

I agree with the writer of the blog! SALIL Tripathi. All those saying they had never heard of the novel earlier, I would humbly say, if you had not heard that does not mean no one had heard, also Rome Juliet was a novel , it didn't came in lime light after the movie on it, but was a classic it self.


So to imply SLB is doing some favour to author by bringing the novel to limelight may not be entirely true.

The author of the blog is not trying to demean SLB or his creation, but since SLB has chosen to call his work as inspired by the novel, he is just trying to draw parallels between the two.

So true the novel was about the quest of the individual, which comes forth in the novel again and again in for of his inner turmoils.

In serial the only turmoil we have seen till now is of Saraswatichandra fighting the demon of his past and his affection for his lost mother.

Till now what we are seeing is only built up by some realistic some unrealistic events, of a romantic linkage. The era is different so the shyness of kumudsundari or the subtle hints of love have been replaced keeping in track with the newer times.

But serial is yet to move towards some central message, which it will follow through out ( like it was quest for saraswatichandra in the novel to find himself.

I think instead of jumping the gun to the person who may not like the serial as much as you, or may have a different view, we must encourage such fruitful discussions on the forum.

It's not he is doing it for sake of it, he is just presenting his view point, the same way Mary is rightly saying that this is soap opera and not the novel. But he is just trying to link the soul novel had to the soul serial is having, just to draw parallel.

I think the writer of the article is too quick to judge the serial!
Jjoshim thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#16
@ n kapoor, you are right that he judged it too quickly, rightly said, the book cannot be judged by its cover! But at the same time, he has all the right to write, the way we have.
annie2212 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#17
Whether the serial does justice to the masterpiece or not, whether slb intended to change the story completely or not, I think the critic has a right to feel the way he does because the novel is his legacy and naturally he cannot stand to see the essence of the novel being lost in the rush to gain commercial success. I think we viewers are so defensive abt slb and his serial because after ages of being subjected to trash, we are getting to watch somthing better and we are greatful for that. But that just means that we have set ours benchmarks fir standards low. I respect the critic's sentiments and wish that slb would give us a true masterpiece and noy judt a run-of-the-mill daily soap.
Edited by annie2212 - 12 years ago
-The_Tomboy- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#18
to the writer of the article i.e., othe novel writer: hats off to u dude hats off!! first off it takes seriously a real huge amounts of guts to criticize that person who has brought something long forgotten especially belonging to ur family in front of the world where not only the serial or drama or whatever but the real reason is gaining the appreciation I guess which was not given in these days!!

Well whoever is the writer of the article is not just criticizing but is hurting the feelings of sanjay leela bhansaali and also the team who work so hard just to present a episode to the audience. the author of the article may not tell it hurting but may name it criticizim but it is not healthy enough to be grateful to the director and producer of the show.

Well forget indian movies and soap operas where on earth even do the western not add spices to attract the audience? do you think hp is the same as in the book?? no not of the movies I have seen and books I have read (I read book 1 and 2 till now) to attract the audience surely there will be some changes or I might say major changes on the screen! well one question to the writer : do you think it is easy to portray the royal times and the folklore of the very ancient india with so much of fairy tale on the screen! remember sheek dena aacharan ki upeksha karna hai parantu uska mool tab hi samjhme aata hain jab hum uska aacharan kare!

And about saraswati chandra and kumud being handsome and beautiful yes it is needed! audience not only look for the story but also the people who portray it! if the role doesn't suit the person portraying it do u think it will make sense!!about kumud's costume yes it is a question among the audience too but u just can't call her a model . saraswatichandra may be arrogant, yes when something is not right just to prove it right but he is confident too!! it is impossible to enact the book page by page where there maybe just conversations not so important! just like a chaat without spices is not a chaat in the same way a movie or a soap opera is not a movie or a soap opera till there are sub plots! well it takes real guts to take a book as a base for a movie or a serial and what would the problem be when slb has made a crystal clear statement that he will not take up the book totally as it is, there made changes, many changes but when already informed what is problem??
Diamond_14 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#19
i hope slb doesn't read this stupid article.personally i think slb and team are doing a great job in the show. we are loving the love track more than anything else. slb did say that he is not sticking to the book completely. we are not in a 2 hour journey or just few days like in the film and book. we are going to be watching this show atleast for two years or more so he has to consider the target audience.
823783 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: annie2212

Whether the serial does justice to the masterpiece or not, whether slb intended to change the story completely or not, I think the critic has a right to feel the way he does because the novel is his legacy and naturally he cannot stand to see the essence of the novel being lost in the rush to gain commercial success. I think we viewers are so defensive abt slb and his serial because after ages of being subjected to trash, we are getting to watch somthing better and we are greatful for that. But that just means that we have set ours benchmarks fir standards low. I respect the critic's sentiments and wish that slb would give us a true masterpiece and noy judt a run-of-the-mill daily soap.



he shud have thought abt family legacy n honour before selling its rights to slb..through his interviews he has made it clear that serial sc will not b totally based on novel..only the basic characters will b same. If the writer of this article is soo much worried then he n his family members shud discuss it with slb rather than publishing article on media

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".