Originally posted by: Marybarton
A scathing review that will really hurt SLB, particularly because it comes from a member of the writer's family. But, remember that he never promised to stay true to the book and the book is a classic - therefore, well past any copyright talks about authenticity. The Bard/Shakespeare was not only adapted and reinterpreted, over the ages it has been trashed and made into children's plays. The classic doesn't get soiled, so we need to give SLB the right. Afterall, his show is what made this review even possible. People are talking about Saraswatichandra the book. As the writer here said, the long-forgotten book. SLB has already done a great service by reintroducing it to the masses. Isn't that something?
The writer should have thanked SLB at least once even while criticizing the presentation of the book. But all he does is get on a high horse to complain with the benefit of his last name how SLB didn't get it right. This show has had too many scathing reviews because the expectations are so high while other new joke shows are getting flippy good reviews. Be fair!
The hero of the show may be beautiful for TRP generating reasons, but he is not portraying an arrogant character. None of the viewers saw him as arrogant. Neither is Kumud just a model. This is not an art film, it is a soap opera. Of course things will be reduced to the basics! Beautiful counts and so does drama. Be a little gracious and appreciate that SLB respected Saraswatichandra the book and gave it a new life. It is a canonical work, it can't be soiled by what you find is a bad imitation. So why take offense?