I watched the round where Vineet and Nihira got their green cards. It was a tough competition. Except Ifran, everyone's performance was outstanding. Daler definitely did not deserve that seat.
Meanwhile, I want to write something which keeps bugging me. We are all very shocked and upset about some of the decisions made by some judges. Just wondering what can we do about this. We are all in different part of the world but watching one of the most exciting shows in the history of Indian Television, expecting fair decisions and the most deserving contestants win the event. I know we cannot resolve this problem but I would request everyone to make your inputs on this. So at least the message will reach the organizers and there is a chance for them to considerate this.
I want to bring in the most sensitive issue of judging this event again here. In my view a judge, in order to make a fair decision should have the following qualifications:
- An in-depth knowledge of Indian Classical Music
- Successful practical experience in Indian Film Music Industry
- Proven ability in judging major musical events
- Ability to make his/ her own judgment without anybody's influence
- Ability to convince the audience and participants about the positive/ negative points of each participant's performance
As I mentioned earlier, Shivji & Hariji would be my first choice. Kavita Krishnamoorthy is another person who makes excellent decisions and gives respect to the participants. I believe that all successful musicians are not necessarily good judges. In my opinion if a person takes the assignment of judging an event, he/ she has to make a decision rather than asking the mentors to do it. If they are not capable of doing the job they should not accept it.
My second issue is the public voting. As per the information available, viewers are asked to vote for Gharana of their choice. Based on the public voting, the top two gharanas will get a chance to recall 2 paricipants who were already eliminated. My concern is why vote for a gharana? Why not for a participant? Does voting for a gharana make sense to you? Let me explain to you. We all agree that Vishwas is a very versatile singer and his elimination was totally unacceptable. We all want him to come back to make this competition more lively and healthy. Now look at this scenario carefully. I think in public voting LET'S ROCK. leads the table followed by YALGAAR. YALGAAR will naturally recall Mr. U.K. and LET'S ROCK will go for Aishwarya whose name appeared in almost every episode after his elimination or Sweet sweet Nanu. (I have nothing against Paresh, Aishwarya or Nanu. They all sing very well but we are looking at the best). We want to see the most deserving participants competing in the final rounds. Now, Vishwas, the singer we all consider as one of the best in the competition has no chance of coming back unless JAI HO gets into the top who got very remote chance. Ujjaini has been eliminated from the competition and absolutely no chance for her to come back because JL has very little chance to move up from the bottom of the table. Now my concern is why should a deserving singer be victimized for an incompetent judge's decision? Why can't public get a chance to bring them back? So the bottom line is instead of voting for Gharanas, public should be allowed to vote for participants which makes perfect sense.
So please post your inputs on this ASAP.