Clarification from your reporter - Page 18

I have just one questyion to all..

Earlier this year the same issue was raised in this forum by a member against a certain MOD/s.

The people who are constantly debating on the merit of the replies provided by the present MODS had given the EXACT SAME REPLY on behalf of that MOD/S..and yes..they spoke on behalf !!!

If they believed these replies to be correct jsut 7-8 monyths back why are they not correct now? what has changed in these months..the MODs?

so can I also assume something here..the unwritten hints between the words?

Originally posted by: s.priya

Loved this line.

Would have loved it if you had also used the same sentiment when you chose to levy charges based on your assumptions or the machinations of your mind, without bothering to verify whether it is true or not.

Please be direct, so I can answer this. Give me the specific incident so I will address it.

Originally posted by: s.priya

CRIME!!!

Who alleged crime?

Ms. Bholi Bhali Global Moderator Joined: November 10 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 7562

Posted: September 28 2006 at 2:43pm | IP Logged Shady there is NO such system. Members who are Banned or Blocked were MIS, and were here for trouble only. Plus, making false statements is a CRIME. Therefore, its better you back off. This Topic is Closed. Regards India-Forums Development Team

BUMPED

Originally posted by: Ms. Bholi Bhali

I did not accused you. I said, PMs can be edited, so before anything else, I have to make sure as the feature is still in making, and other dev team members i asked, they weren't aware of it too. and Vijay wasn't here.

ppl are banned on the basis of PMs, because, we hear both sides of the story. we just don't ban the members on the first go. they are given many chances and are kept under observation.

if u are really curious, we can try that on you.

I thought I answered u here, but if u still think I accused u, then I am sorry that you think I accused you, coz I didn't!!!

Originally posted by: Iron

Adi here is questioning Shady..I was not coming in as he doesnot need any lawyer,..he knows he is right and doing right ful thing

SHould Adi really question hm on Mohini, none of us is a fool.

Yes Adi has the right to question.because in the past one month people have taken the liberty for questioning his integrity,ability and character based on "supposed evidences" which as I just proved are baseless becuase there are so many loopholes there.How can anyone bring in my name when my version of the story was not even heard ?

Originally posted by: vijay

Do you really know what does underdog means?

Underdog = One at a disadvantage and expected to lose

Debojit : Always had the edge through the contest. He always got the maximum number of votes. He WON the contest. So I wont call him an Underdog.

Himesh : Well he already so popular and most of his songs are on Top 10.

Debojit was the underdog because he got the least point from judges in the final 5.

Himesh was the underdog in the HR Case that was brought out against him.

And going by your definition, how can you assume that I would call any members at a disadvantage or expected to lose? Is there a game or contest going on in this forum?

Don't make allegations when I haven't even mentioned any member.

Shady, the HR case was a fun post. Please do not drag issues.

This is the whole problem. When something is done in jest, it is taken seriously and serious issues are trivilised.

I am again requesting you - do not bring up the HR case..... It started as a fun thing

Originally posted by: s.priya

Shady, the HR case was a fun post. Please do not drag issues.

This is the whole problem. When something is done in jest, it is taken seriously and serious issues are trivilised.

I am again requesting you - do not bring up the HR case..... It started as a fun thing

I understand Priya - I don't want to divert from the main issue. Vijay too, please note. It doesn't matter whether HR is an underdog or not.

What matters is I was not referring to forum members as underdogs, and it is wrong to allege me of doing so, and going further and alleging me of dividing the forum.

This is precisely the kind of tone I was unhappy about.

Gauri,

You were one of those crusaders who did not want others to answer on behalf of others. Why are you now raising an issue on a dialogue between Adi and Shady??

Not that I mind, believe me, I feel that is a good way to converse on the forum, but since you were so opposed to it in principle, I find it a bit strange coming from you now

Originally posted by: shadyhtown

SHADY,

sorry do not buy your explanations,

you are mere playing with words here..and dodging the issue.

There were more than 3 SRGMP witnesses over there that day..and u also know who they were.

have you taken their statement also in this matter ? Why were they not approached for their view?

There were some other members present there, why was they not asked for their statement on the issue

How did you arrive at your conclusion that Bhaskar was not honest? How did you arrive at your conclusion that Mohini was telling the truth?

Why were you selective in choosing your witnesses?

Again repeat..when the section Viewbie and MOD was present..why was their opinion not taken.

HOw can you then call it a thouroughly investigates case?