DOTW - SRGMP Contests: Who should judge? - Page 18

Originally posted by: jayc1234

Dolly - this is art, and ever expanding... here we look for talent - not the winner.... Gauri have a good example and that is already clarified.... The talented guy needs to make it big and needs to have a platform - if he wins, great... if he ends up just below the winner, music does not loose anything.. he still starts off with an advantage than being an anonymous winner 👍🏼

why he should loose ..it has happened again and again not once but everytime..Most of these singers are between 18 to early 20s..they are from ordinery background with high hopes and hoping for fame and recognition...and if thet are always below the winner what kind of message it is sending them...what kind of encouragement they are getting. Dont they deserve to get that. its human nature every one needs it especially if they know they deserv it...

Originally posted by: srgmp

does that mean , winning has nothing todo with the competetion ?? 😕

unfortunatly this is what iam understanding 😕😕... why the best and desreved not win ..why the other...what is the point of selecting "winners" when it is not important.

Originally posted by: srgmp

I donot completely agree with you jaya ji on this take.
Being a Winner does makes lot of difference , it does give you lots of confidence , does give you recognizaiton ( which you need at early stage of your life - even if you know you have lots of talent ) - So I think , those who deserver and those are best talented amond all , should be the winner!!😊

yes!!!!! and it is not happeneing till now with public voting 😕

Originally posted by: dolly

why he should loose ..it has happened again and again not once but everytime..Most of these singers are between 18 to early 20s..they are from ordinery background with high hopes and hoping for fame and recognition...and if thet are always below the winner what kind of message it is sending them...what kind of encouragement they are getting. Dont they deserve to get that. its human nature every one needs it especially if they know they deserv it...

But what pupose will it serve if they win and are noticed by anyone.. Will that send a very right message??? This has been happening in SRGMP for years now? How many people (same age, same background that u mentioned) how many of them were remembered after the competition got over? Is that very encouraging...

Here atleast when the person is finishing anything between 2nd to say 5th.. he/she is getting noticed, getting early breaks.. from where on they can make it big if they have it in them... They surely are not complaining! 😊

Originally posted by: jayc1234

Dolly - we keep coming back to the same thing... the topic is not about getting one winner - No - it is not... Please let us get this clear! So, again its not about getting the winner - No it is not!!

Yes - give the best and talented guy the prize - SRGM has been doing that for the last 10 years or so.. How many of them did people remember after the show was over, hhow amny people even watched the show (even in India)... So what is the point of getting the best winner?

Atleast let there be singers identified out of the show who can start off with an advantage.. I am not saying that they will all make it big.. No they will not.. But atleast they start off their next struggle with a lot of advantage - and that is very very important for them!

it can be other way around too jaya...let the best one win and give others chance 😕..winning is importent because it is a compition..after all

Originally posted by: dolly

unfortunatly this is what iam understanding 😕😕... why the best and desreved not win ..why the other...what is the point of selecting "winners" when it is not important.

There is not point in having winners whose journey ends there... We need the best singers out of the show to move on, to make it big.. whether they win or not is not the all important factor... if they get the breaks early that is what matters...

I am sure Karunya will be happy finishing at #2 and get movie breaks, rather than finishing at #1 in a show that does not have a public following and hence no breaks and glory to follow... 😕

Originally posted by: jayc1234

But what pupose will it serve if they win and are noticed by anyone.. Will that send a very right message??? This has been happening in SRGMP for years now? How many people (same age, same background that u mentioned) how many of them were remembered after the competition got over? Is that very encouraging...

Here atleast when the person is finishing anything between 2nd to say 5th.. he/she is getting noticed, getting early breaks.. from where on they can make it big if they have it in them... They surely are not complaining! 😊

it is being noticed now because of other facters ....media, etc..not public voting.......only and it will be served even with judges on panal selecting the winner....unfortunatly it is all realted to buisness aspect and not talent aspect ...matlab the current format is

Originally posted by: dolly

it can be other way around too jaya...let the best one win and give others chance 😕..winning is importent because it is a compition..after all

More than a competition - its a talent hunt show.. the world of these singers do not finish where the competition ends.. a new struggle begins.. and the recognition only helps them to start off the struggle on a more positive note...

Originally posted by: jayc1234

To me - its a talent hunt show! Winner or not - as long as the talent is identified - the purpose is served... 👍🏼

And if we look at it.. the majority whom we (the people agai) think should be winner are usually in the top 5, and by that time of their journey they are sufficiently recognized to break through... And that is important 😊

for any competetion, few closely knowledgable/talented participants are choosen to compete with each other and best should win!!! ( thats what the general structure of any competetion)

from what I understand, point here is not that if talent is being identified or not, but the point here is , if this kind of competetion be judged by public / viewer / participants relatives. In that case, I dont think it should be judged by public / viewer / participants relatives. and they should not have any say in deciding results.👍🏼

Originally posted by: jayc1234

There is not point in having winners whose journey ends there... We need the best singers out of the show to move on, to make it big.. whether they win or not is not the all important factor... if they get the breaks early that is what matters...

I am sure Karunya will be happy finishing at #2 and get movie breaks, rather than finishing at #1 in a show that does not have a public following and hence no breaks and glory to follow... 😕

and do you think the no.# 1 will make it big later on...😕 when out of contract...what it will do that person when after getting all the fame will come out in real world and find it otherwise . why not sturggle to began with and make himself/ herself strong