to stir up some more-
goal of some of our education and/ or riaz, at least in terms of practice as opposed to intellectual theoretical content -> perfection is primary focus, creativity is supposed to be by-product?
goal of western education -> stress is on individual, which is assumed to lead to personal creativity, perfection is supposed to follow if one is motivated enough?
so, does it come down to focus and goals? rememer, a lot of what is humanly possibly and what we do achieve is based on what we focus on primarily. hard work is a given in any methodology
what we often do -> bring up ancient practices and claim why these are the best practices even today? for sure, they were the best in the world thousands of years ago, but have others caught up and surpassed us?
if we spend a lot of our lives just perfecting ourselves, does it leave a lot of time, energy and focus for creativity, provided that is indeed an objective. do we have a lot of folks who have surpassed their masters, do we lose something each time we pass on the torch to the next gen?
another saying- engineers have the "desire for perfection" syndrome. ever thought why that desire is sometimes considered a problem? btw, that the goal of a lot of our education is "perfection" might also be borne out anecdotally. after all, we do have parity with others in IT/ engineering fields. these fields are more about computational precision/ perfection than others.
Edited by chatbuster - 19 years ago