Originally posted by: adwarakanath
How come we never noticed it?
No one said anything when Paresh (who actually is quite besura) was still in the competition. He's a UK citizen. So is Swananda (who, by the way, is a fantastic singer).
Here are my views -
1) Apologise to the public
2) Get judges...and good judges. Not jokers like Daler Mahendi and Sameer
3) Set an age limit of 23 for boys and 20 for girls.
4) Classical training of atleast 7 years should be a criterion
5) Mentor system is a MUST. But throw out rascals like AS and HR. IMHO, the mentors should be -
ARR, ID, Deobajyoti Mishra, J-L.
6) No public voting please
7) Instruct Shaan not to use region-based nicknames
8) Don't get mentors who're allergic to old songs...like HR. And do give the contestants freedom of choice. Don't say you cant select old songs. Old songs are the soul of Hindi music and they test your skill.
9) Rigourous eliminations - semiclassical, raga based (yes, there's a difference), rock based, jazz based, hip-hop, pop, beat oriented, mand-madhyam-taar saptak oriented songs, slow, fast songs...etc.
am against the idea of "rigorous eliminations" for following reason: you could end up eliminating singers who excel in say 3 out of 4 aspects, while giving the green to singers who are above average in all 4. in hindsight, this is the kind of arbitrariness that has happened in earlier rounds with C2005 where some very good singers got eliminated.
in life, it is often your ability to scale the peaks that counts, whether its a JEE entrance exam or a presidential election. you sort of have to be the best at whatever you do, in this case with whatever genre you take up. who's interested in listening to an above average performer in a certain genre when you can "buy" different performers, each of whom is best in their respective area.
i also think that "best" in music is a very subjective thing. somewhat like answering who is the most beautiful woman in the world. its not math. there are emotions and various other factors that together make up the total package.
having judges is ultimately reverting to a thinking which says you should hand over power to a dictator or a coterie of them. i agree that democracy and public voting are riddled with problems, but the alternatives are worse. the potential for mischief on the part of judges is there, and one judge can mistakenly tip the (musical) scales in favor of an unworthy contestant.
ultimately, you have to first define what the objective is. do you want a good all-round singer, or someone who is the best in his/ her best category. also whether you are looking for an all-round performer or a performer that you will not watch live...
For me at least, a lot of the entertainment that saregama that has provided over the years is actually seeing the folks perform. but as soon as you do that, you have to know that even judges can get swayed by the non-audio factors. for me, the power of TV is you can both see and hear and like it or not, we are interested in the visual impact as well. if and when i want to just hear, there is the stereo system....
i