Originally posted by: sheilasandhu
Fair enough that she may give a message at the end of the track but the damage would already been done by then. There are many many illiterate people in India who would take a serial and it's initial message as the gospel truth. Yes agreed that Zoya the character did not open her mouth and that was the doing of the PH and or her CVS. If they had made her open her mouth and stand her stand, it would not have been so bad cause it would not have shown women to be such whimsical creatures of this place called earth. I may have been misconstrued in my message but i am and will always be against any kind of injustice to women, children, elderly and even animals for that matter. If it is shown in fictional or non fictional my thoughts remain the same.
First of all, she never started it off as some moral show. It's a drama where she will have to show both logical and illogical twists to run the show. If she wants to pass a message, obviously she will have to build a damn track and then send the message loud and clear in the end! That's how it is in the movies, stories, books as well so how is it different here? Zoya didn't opne her mouth because Cvs and PH told her not to so remind who writes Asad and Ayaan's character? For that matter everyone else's as well? Can this Cvs , PH excuse used only for Zoya? You said injustice to everyone except men. SO you're okay with injustice done to men? or are they not humans? Oh well whatever the case be, your beliefs. Good for you!!Yes i do make comments or other post and they may sound childish, cynical or totally misleading but that is just to keep the flow of humor and thread. Purely entertainment. Likewise i too think that even on this post the discussion was merely on the serial and then everyone starts getting uptight . Everyone has their know POV and if you guys do not like mine , i can't force you. I shall remember to never comment on your post again. Apologies extended.As long as I haven't personally attacked you, I don't think I needa give explanations. Sure everyone has their POV, just like I have mine. I am not forcing mine you neither am I stopping you to state yours. SO why the fuss? Is it because I disagreed and quoted you? Then maybe you should've put a disclaimer and I wouldn't have. LOL do you think I'm gunna force you to comment on my posts? You're free to post wherever you want. I could care less and don't apologize to me. I don't get what you're apologizing for but I haven't accused of you anything as such for you to apologize to me!Lastly i do not even think i should be arguing here since many of the members are students or just very young adults who seem to think that if the have vast knowledge of the English Vocabulary, they know what reality is all about. When you live abroad and and don't know the mentality of a general Indian citizen, it would not be fair to make any kind of judgments.
And you're the one to know what we have seen in our life and what we have not? Who knows maybe I have seen much more at the age of 19, then you have at the age of 50? & I, very well, understand the sentiments of Indian citizen we all. SO I guess it's better not to make personal comments without knowing the truth!P.S Since it was not trade please advice me to what that exchange was???? Maybe i am too daft at the age of almost 50...Definition of 'Trade'
A basic economic concept that involves multiple parties participating in the voluntary negotiation and then the exchange of one's goods and services for desired goods and services that someone else possesses. The advent of money as a medium of exchange has allowed trade to be conducted in a manner that is much simpler and effective compared to earlier forms of trade, such as bartering.