Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
'Marraige is meant to be a beautiful bond which grows and evolves over time .'That bond is EMOTIONAL AND SPIRITUAL ...........the one that you described . This emotional bond develops over a period of time only , that is exactly what I said in MY post too . And thats the reason I asked , what is this 'I need time' thing , is there any specific limitation to it , a time period to it , a date for it ? No ! The real fact is women like Pratigya and Varsha themselves have no answer for it coz they themselves don't know ! It is a very vague statement ...........I need more time , in which they expect a man to wait like a saint indefinetely for them , 'till they come around' and I find that grossly unfair as when a man gives this same treatment to a woman , she feels horribly insulted . Is the woman going to come around in two years ? I mean , AFTER the marraige takes place ? Or Five years ? Or Three years ? When does 'the time become right ' ? And if she needed Time and this was the answer she was going to give her husband after the marraige , why did she get married in the first place ? She shud have taken Allll the time BEFORE the marraige ! { am talking of a general woman here] . Once u give the commitment that means you are ready .Infact even when a woman is 60 and her husband is 65 she finds that the bond is still evolving . The exploring each other is still there . That mystery never ends. But because the bond is still evolving , she has not procrastinated love making , having children , various levels of marraige . She is pragmatic enough to realise that the evolving involves all this too , you cannot seperate the two .My POV purely . It is from a pragmatic POV that I talked .
In case of Pratigya - Krishna context, its only a day since the dark clouds over their marriage seemed to have subsided. So If you think that that she would say 1- 2 -3 - Go is not gonna happen. đ