Why didn't Jalal defend himself? - Page 5

Originally posted by: chak

Jalal explained Maham about his temple visit "Was it true" r he was just consoling his Badi ammi so that she doesn't feel bad...I wonder whether his dialogues were really true...was it just Satisfactory talks...Pls do comment my dear JAians...

i know right😊
citizen grievances😆

Originally posted by: -Suni-

i know right😊
citizen grievances😆

he didn't said anything, coz that time he knew he was at fault. he remembers his soldiers telling him abt loot and same time Jodha coming there. and that's the first time he had heard abt Jodha. and he was so engrossed in her that he didn't pay any attention abt the loot his soldiers were telling him. so he knows , as a king responsibility of it is on him, and so he stayed quiet, coz one word of defense would have angered her more , and he knows now he better acts abt it than defend in just words

Originally posted by: Star_girl

I guess Jalal is a lot more sensitive than other people. He felt that his people were his responsibility as you mention. It was important to note that when talking to Atgah Khan, or whatever the hell his name is, he did not say anything about the war itself, for he knew that it couldn't have been stopped, but he talked about how one bad move of his people can ruin the image he was trying to create.

The war had to happen. Jodha is plain stupid if she thinks that wars will not involve bloodshed, as if her so-called Rajvanshis don't create wars. I think her grievances were more about the death of Suryabhan than anything else. However, Jalal did not worry about the war itself but the way his people were trying to waste his efforts. This may lead him to Adham.

u r using the right name. it's Shamshuddin Atgah Khan

sumtimes i feel dt jalal is seriously unpredictable..i mean kabhi so harsh n kabhi so sympaathetic..