Ovi Purvi 'Sisterhood/or BShood'

This is going to be short and sweet. I just want to address one thing...everyone keeps saying that Arjun is now Purvi's sister's husband and ARVI should never happen again by this reasoning. HA!! Thats the best BS Ive heard in a long while. 🤣 Brings tears of laughter to my eyes after all.

First of all, that reasoning is the biggest "Maha Bakwaas" (I know I keep saying this...and I am well aware the MahaSangam episode is over...I just keep saying it now because I like the way it sounds)

Sooo...as I posted in that thread...if we employ this reasoning...the very first ceremony involving a "puja" in front of God...blessings of elders...and with total mutual consent of both parties...was actually Arjun and Purvi's engagement ceremony. (The surprise engagement at a 5 star hotel in front of a Party of Strangers...that was totally mutually non-consentual I might add...does not count...as I recall..was there a puja?? I dont remember any blessings or religious ceremony or anything?? They simply took my ladla, surprised the daylights out of him, and before he had a chance to recover from his shock, grabbed his hand...forced a ring on it and proceeded to then haul him into takng some lovely dysfunctional family pictures??)

Sooo...wasnt the CC the one who actually did the wrong thing in that case???? By making a deal with and emotionally blackmailing her "sister" with her own mother...and then stealing her "sister's" true fiancee...given with full blessings according to "Hindu religious rites...in the presence of God" in the first place????? Sooo...if we reason on the sisterly thing...the Maha..(Ok I wont do it..am tempted but will shut up about saying this)...doesnt that kind of make the marriage of Arjun Ovi in question???? Not the other way around???? Just saying...

My point is quit with the "Sister Sister" BS. Purvi is no more Ovi's sister than I am...in every sense...and if we do look at it this way...then we can say Ovi is the one who sinned here...and throw out the Arjun Ovi marrriage in any case since the Crazy Chic (as my "forum sister" and my ladla's darling maasi so aptly puts it...the CC)...made the Devil's deal to destroy something that was put together and blessed by God first.

Loved it!!!! 👏

Tomorrow I shall comment more... but for now... know that I agree with you and when Arjun and Purvi got engaged I commented saying that that was a REAL engagement where both parties were aware, consented and were blessed before God... thats what made their engagement special.

That whole sister-sister Maha BS (as u nicely put it) logic has to apply BOTH ways if it is to be used.

Sooo...if we are truly employing logic here...it is Arjun and Purvi's ceremony that is binding...not Arjun and Ovi's farce of a marriage. They may have gone to the Mandir...and Purvi may have marched them around the fire and bamboozled a couple of priests into chanting the verses. But the actual contract, elders, witnesses are not present--not to mention the consulting of the pandit...matching of the kundlis..and the whole point of the Muhurtham time...that is why you have to get married at that time in order to be valid according to Hindu rites (believe me I know...my marriage was a love marriage but to please our parents my hubby and I agreed to do a wedding in India. My father in law is very strict about this sort of thing...and our Muhurtham time was 3AM...in Delhi...in April...I leave the rest to your imagination. We have the most hilarious wedding pictures...the entire family...both his side and mine...were passed out on the chairs, each others shoulders, etc.. by the mandap...even my father in law was looking pretty cross-eyed and desparate for the priest to get it over with...as for my hubby and yours truly?? By the time they were through with me...I didnt even remember the wedding...to be honest I still dont 😆😆).

My point being..you cannot just build a fire, march around it, put sindoor on, tie a mangulsutra, say you are married and call it a day. It doesnt work like that. And Jhanvi you are right. Instead of just saying "Oh Ok..this stinks but hey what are you gonna do?"...they should have immediately done something about it. Also the final kicker...can we truly call a couple husband and wife if they do not consummate the marriage? By all the religions...Hinduism included...this is the most essential part. Without consummation it is simply not valid.

This is my take...to my knowledge. I am sure there will be plenty of responses giving details to refute this...again, I am giving my own example and this is in accordance to my knowledge and culture of my home state...but where I come from...ARVI fan..ARMAN fan...Ekta fan or no...has nothing to do with it...from a purely analysis standpoint...I dont think this marriage of Arjun Ovi...especially after ARVI's ceremony would be valid.

As far as what you have said...yes I can deny that and I do. So there. Arjun is not Purvi's sister's husband. I invite you to back your viewpoint with details as I have done mine. As for the Jeeju part and Jeeja ji part...well that is too ridiculous to even bother responding...