hw rudeee...

i didn't like Aarti's ystrdys behavior with Yash.😡she is sooo rude & ruthless creature.😡 she has no self respect...she was literally begging in front of Prashant. shameee on her. & other hand poor Yash every time help her & save her from MUSIBAT. & she has no manners to at least thank him. just fed up of this rude behavior...

I was just so disappointed in her actions. Where was her self-respect? And the anger she shows everyone else? That anger was supposed to be directed at Prashant for what he did to her. I thought that she would have at least made good use of the mandir bells and whap him over the head with it. But no! she starts begging him as soon as he walks in front of her...when i saw her i could not help but think that sometimes women cause the injustice that is meted out to us when we accept such things

I agree on that she annoyed me with her no self respect on her going to meet Prashant the loser, but her behaivours towards Yash is natural, everything happened infront of her misleaded her... At end of day, she is a human being and a human being is not perfect... Only ALLAH is perfect...

Originally posted by: nishersal

I was just so disappointed in her actions. Where was her self-respect? And the anger she shows everyone else? That anger was supposed to be directed at Prashant for what he did to her. I thought that she would have at least made good use of the mandir bells and whap him over the head with it. But no! she starts begging him as soon as he walks in front of her...when i saw her i could not help but think that sometimes women cause the injustice that is meted out to us when we accept such things

TOTALLY AGREE WITH U. REALLY WELL SAID👏👏👏👏

I don't mean to sound rude, but if you find Aarti's actions and words at the Mandir "disrespectful" and disgusting, then the concept of the show is lost on you.

Wasn't Yash standing right below, begging his wife for direction, while Aarti was begging Prashant for the same?
It was not meant as infidelity on her part. If anything, at that point in time, she felt she owed Prashant, not Yash. Both of them were doubting the marriage. Both of them were considering breaking it off, at the slightest sign from their beloveds. Its just that her past love still has a physical manifestation, whereas Yash's does not.

Yes, she could have acted with more tact, but she didn't. Aarti's characterization and her relationship history (and previous interactions with Prashant), made that scene what it was. If she had acted any other way, it wouldn't have been believable.

I lost no respect for her in that scene. I only sympathized with her. Hats off to production for making Aarti's weakness for Prashant (her image of him anyway), believable, despite the backdrop that is her strong, independent, single-mother character.

Originally posted by: Charishma

I don't mean to sound rude, but if you find Aarti's actions and words at the Mandir "disrespectful" and disgusting, then the concept of the show is lost on you.

Wasn't Yash standing right below, begging his wife for direction, while Aarti was begging Prashant for the same?
It was not meant as infidelity on her part. If anything, at that point in time, she felt she owed Prashant, not Yash. Both of them were doubting the marriage. Both of them were considering breaking it off, at the slightest sign from their beloveds. Its just that her past love still has a physical manifestation, whereas Yash's does not.

Yes, she could have acted with more tact, but she didn't. Aarti's characterization and her relationship history (and previous interactions with Prashant), made that scene what it was. If she had acted any other way, it wouldn't have been believable.

I lost no respect for her in that scene. I only sympathized with her. Hats off to production for making Aarti's weakness for Prashant (her image of him anyway), believable, despite the backdrop that is her strong, independent, single-mother character.

I AM NOT SAYING THAT SHE HAS TO FALL IN LOVE WITH YASH. I AM JUST TALIKING ABT ETHICS,GENERAL MANNERS WHICH EVERY ONE MUST HAVE. I CAN UNDERSTAND HER SITUATION BUT WE MUST THANK THEM WHO HELP US.
& IF I WAS THERE I WOULD STAND THERE QUIETLY FRONT OF THAT PRASHANT BUT DIDN'T BEGG OF HIM. PLSSS

Originally posted by: Charishma

I don't mean to sound rude, but if you find Aarti's actions and words at the Mandir "disrespectful" and disgusting, then the concept of the show is lost on you.

Wasn't Yash standing right below, begging his wife for direction, while Aarti was begging Prashant for the same?
It was not meant as infidelity on her part. If anything, at that point in time, she felt she owed Prashant, not Yash. Both of them were doubting the marriage. Both of them were considering breaking it off, at the slightest sign from their beloveds. Its just that her past love still has a physical manifestation, whereas Yash's does not.

Yes, she could have acted with more tact, but she didn't. Aarti's characterization and her relationship history (and previous interactions with Prashant), made that scene what it was. If she had acted any other way, it wouldn't have been believable.

I lost no respect for her in that scene. I only sympathized with her. Hats off to production for making Aarti's weakness for Prashant (her image of him anyway), believable, despite the backdrop that is her strong, independent, single-mother character.

Originally posted by: aditibd

I AM NOT SAYING THAT SHE HAS TO FALL IN LOVE WITH YASH. I AM JUST TALIKING ABT ETHICS,GENERAL MANNERS WHICH EVERY ONE MUST HAVE. I CAN UNDERSTAND HER SITUATION BUT WE MUST THANK THEM WHO HELP US.
& IF I WAS THERE I WOULD STAND THERE QUIETLY FRONT OF THAT PRASHANT BUT DIDN'T BEGG OF HIM. PLSSS

When you say ethics, I assume you mean commitment and respect. But at the point, neither were committed (in their hearts or minds) to the other, and neither owed each other anything. For them, it isn't just a regular engagement, it is the definition of compromise. And they were both doing the same things at the same time. Why should we find Aarti's behavior reprehensible, but not Yash's? Yes he has a dead wife. But he's made it clear on many occasions that Aarti's is simply a means to an end. She isn't mean to be his wife in truth. So then why should Aarti be held to a higher standard?? Why does she have to consider Yash, when he obviously did not consider her? Why must she 'stand quitely'? Its unladylike to beg and plead? Its unladylike to not be able to divert your affections to someone else at the flip of a switch?

There's nothing that annoys me more than double-standards disguised as arguments of "self-respect" for a woman.

Originally posted by: Charishma

When you say ethics, I assume you mean commitment and respect. But at the point, neither were committed (in their hearts or minds) to the other, and neither owed each other anything. For them, it isn't just a regular engagement, it is the definition of compromise. And they were both doing the same things at the same time. Why should we find Aarti's behavior reprehensible, but not Yash's? Yes he has a dead wife. But he's made it clear on many occasions that Aarti's is simply a means to an end. She isn't mean to be his wife in truth. So then why should Aarti be held to a higher standard?? Why does she have to consider Yash, when he obviously did not consider her? Why must she 'stand quitely'? Its unladylike to beg and plead? Its unladylike to not be able to divert your affections to someone else at the flip of a switch?

There's nothing that annoys me more than double-standards disguised as arguments of "self-respect" for a woman.

this marriage is compromise 4 Yash surely. but at least he has some manners of hw to behave in society. & not behaving like a crazy like Aarti. he has manners to help others when they need him.she has no manners at all to at least thank him. & this is very usual & natural behavior that we thank strangers also who help us...
ohh plsss hw could u begg front of that man (Prashant)who had through u out of his life. he didn't care for her.& if this is not disrespect or non self respect towards herself. then what is definition of self respect for u???? plsss clear ur definition abt self respect. i really want to know...

Originally posted by: aditibd

this marriage is compromise 4 Yash surely. but at least he has some manners of hw to behave in society. & not behaving like a crazy like Aarti. he has manners to help others when they need him.she has no manners at all to at least thank him. & this is very usual & natural behavior that we thank strangers also who help us...
ohh plsss hw could u begg front of that man (Prashant)who had through u out of his life. he didn't care for her.& if this is not disrespect or non self respect towards herself. then what is definition of self respect for u???? plsss clear ur definition abt self respect. i really want to know...

As far as manners go. Then wasn't Yash a little less mannered in carrying Aarti off the dance floor in front of everyone like that? And dancing the way he did, with that exotic dancer. Wasn't that manner-less as well?
Yes, Aarti behaved in a poor way. But in that scene her character became REAL. Up until then, she was a perfect mother, a perfect daughter, orphaned at a young age, intelligent, hard-working, beautiful, etc. She remains all these things. But for the first time you see a flaw. I celebrate it. She is allowed to be stubborn. She's allowed to want to hold on to the dreams she built with her first husband. Isn't Yash doing the same?
My definition of self-respect doesn't include women behaving sedately, and taking 'what others will think' into account. Their respect is inherent, and no outside source can take it away from them. I understand why she met with Prashant. It isn't easy to do what she's about to do.