Posted:
SO LET ME GET THIS RIGHT
Our Baba is a GUNAHON KA DEVTA? Muaaaavaaaaaaaa BTW
while
The lawyer is a GUNHEGARON KA DEVTA?
Only the Pratigya CVs could come up with this.😆
As a point of note, in India, most areas are protected or overseen by some kind of overlord (or you may call them gangsters - civilian strongarms - take your pick) who maintain order in that area without the use of the law. Their means are non-conventional but effective.
Petty thieves and trouble-makers don't mess up in these neighbourhoods for fear of retribution. This back door justice system is way more effective than the judicial system in India. This is not only a known fact but even the law enforcement systems in India turn a blind eye to this because they know that end of day jab seedhi ungli sey ghee nahi nikalti toh ungli tedhi karni chahiye.
I am not saying that Aman's desire to use the judicial system is wrong and in fact this desire is totally in line with his character but it is a common fact that petty criminals and troublemakers in India are bought to justice by the public mobs and the dominating gundas in the locale rather than the law enforcement bodies.
If you asked the guy whose pocket was stolen to do a police complaint, he would not - it is simple - this is an average working class man who needs to be at work to earn money. most average middle class people will not make the police complaint because the police complaint and the ensuing legal process is time consuming and a burden on their work and family life. So if the man refused to make the complaint, Aman's solution would be incomplete and ineffective and the thief would go free and actually be emboldened to make trouble again in the same area.
There is a saying in India - tumko aam se matlab hai ki pedh se
Today again we saw a perfect example of STREET SMARTS vs. BOOK SMARTS.
This is not a situation of right and wrong here just effective or ineffective.
Don't you think?
Hope
Our Baba is a GUNAHON KA DEVTA? Muaaaavaaaaaaaa BTW
while
The lawyer is a GUNHEGARON KA DEVTA?
Only the Pratigya CVs could come up with this.😆
As a point of note, in India, most areas are protected or overseen by some kind of overlord (or you may call them gangsters - civilian strongarms - take your pick) who maintain order in that area without the use of the law. Their means are non-conventional but effective.
Petty thieves and trouble-makers don't mess up in these neighbourhoods for fear of retribution. This back door justice system is way more effective than the judicial system in India. This is not only a known fact but even the law enforcement systems in India turn a blind eye to this because they know that end of day jab seedhi ungli sey ghee nahi nikalti toh ungli tedhi karni chahiye.
I am not saying that Aman's desire to use the judicial system is wrong and in fact this desire is totally in line with his character but it is a common fact that petty criminals and troublemakers in India are bought to justice by the public mobs and the dominating gundas in the locale rather than the law enforcement bodies.
If you asked the guy whose pocket was stolen to do a police complaint, he would not - it is simple - this is an average working class man who needs to be at work to earn money. most average middle class people will not make the police complaint because the police complaint and the ensuing legal process is time consuming and a burden on their work and family life. So if the man refused to make the complaint, Aman's solution would be incomplete and ineffective and the thief would go free and actually be emboldened to make trouble again in the same area.
There is a saying in India - tumko aam se matlab hai ki pedh se
Today again we saw a perfect example of STREET SMARTS vs. BOOK SMARTS.
This is not a situation of right and wrong here just effective or ineffective.
Don't you think?
Hope
